4
\$\begingroup\$

Yes, I know, I did an (ab) use of the nodes. Is there a better way to make this image with TeX/LaTeX?

Using MiKTeX with Texmaker

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[margin=1.5cm,top=1cm,headheight=16pt,headsep=0.1in,heightrounded]{geometry}
\usepackage{chemfig}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta,shapes,positioning,intersections,quotes}
\setchemfig{%
%       %scheme debug=true,
        arrow offset=9pt,
        arrow coeff=0.7,
%       compound sep=5em,
        + sep left=0.6em,
        + sep right=0.6em,
        atom sep=1.25em,
        fixed length=true
}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
        
\node (n-eptane) at (0, 0) {\chemfig{[:30]--[:-30]--[:-30]--[:-30]}};
\draw[-Triangle] (1.75,0)--++(1,0);
\node (n-eptane-cation) at (5.5, 0) {
    \chemfig{[:30]--[:-30]-\charge{90:4pt=$\oplus$}{}-[:-30]--[:-30]}
};
\draw[gray] (3,.5)--++(5,0);
\draw[gray] (3,.75)--++(5,0);
\foreach \i in {3,3.25,3.5,3.75,...,7.75} {
    \draw[gray] (\i,.5)--(\i+0.25,.75);
}
\draw[-Triangle] (8.5,0)--++(1,0);
\node (propane_and_buthane) at (11.25, 0) {
    \chemfig{[:30]--[:-30]} + \chemfig{[:30]--[:-30]-}
};
\draw[gray] (3,-.4)--++(5,0);
\draw[gray] (3,-.65)--++(5,0);
\foreach \i in {3,3.25,3.5,3.75,...,7.75} {
    \draw[gray] (\i,-.65)--(\i+0.25,-.4);
}
        
\node (2-methyl-exane) at (.15, -1.15) {
    \chemfig{[:30]--[:-30]--[:-30](-[:-90])-[:30]}
};
\node (c) at (2, -1.1 + .3) {};
\node (d) at (2, -1.1 - .3) {};
\draw[-Triangle] (c)  to [out=0,in=0,looseness=2] (d);

\draw[gray] (3,-1.5)--++(5,0);
\draw[gray] (3,-1.75)--++(5,0);
\foreach \i in {3,3.25,3.5,3.75,...,7.75} {
    \draw[gray] (\i,-1.75)--(\i+0.25,-1.5);
}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

5
\$\begingroup\$

I think the hatched lines could be simplified a bit. Instead of drawing two lines and then all the tiny lines in the for-loop, you could draw a double line and fill it with a hatched pattern:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{patterns,patterns.meta}

\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}

\draw[gray,double distance=0.25cm] (3,-1.625)--++(5,0);
\fill[pattern={Lines[angle=45,distance={5pt}]},pattern color=gray] (3,-1.5) rectangle ++(5,-0.25);

\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

And instead of manually calculating all your coordinates, you could position them relative to the nodes you names, e.g. you can position the arrow relative to the n-eptane node:

\documentclass{article}

\usepackage{chemfig}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows.meta}
\setchemfig{%
%       %scheme debug=true,
        arrow offset=9pt,
        arrow coeff=0.7,
%       compound sep=5em,
        + sep left=0.6em,
        + sep right=0.6em,
        atom sep=1.25em,
        fixed length=true
}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
        
\node (n-eptane) at (0, 0) {\chemfig{[:30]--[:-30]--[:-30]--[:-30]}};
\draw[-Triangle] (n-eptane) ++(1.8,0)--++(1,0);

\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.