In mathematics, particularly in algebra, the injective hull (or injective envelope) of a module is both the smallest injective module containing it and the largest essential extension of it. Injective hulls were first described in (Eckmann & Schopf 1953).

Definition

edit

A module   is called the injective hull of a module  , if   is an essential extension of  , and   is injective. Here, the base ring is a ring with unity, though possibly non-commutative.

Examples

edit
  • An injective module is its own injective hull.
  • The injective hull of an integral domain (as a module over itself) is its field of fractions (Lam 1999, Example 3.35).
  • The injective hull of a cyclic  -group (as  -module) is a Prüfer group (Lam 1999, Example 3.36).
  • The injective hull of a torsion-free abelian group   is the tensor product  .
  • The injective hull of   is  , where   is a finite-dimensional  -algebra with Jacobson radical   (Lam 1999, Example 3.41).
  • A simple module is necessarily the socle of its injective hull.
  • The injective hull of the residue field of a discrete valuation ring   where   is  .[1]
  • In particular, the injective hull of   in   is the module  .

Properties

edit
  • The injective hull of   is unique up to isomorphisms which are the identity on  , however the isomorphism is not necessarily unique. This is because the injective hull's map extension property is not a full-fledged universal property. Because of this uniqueness, the hull can be denoted as  .
  • The injective hull  ( ) is a maximal essential extension of   in the sense that if   for a module  , then   is not an essential submodule of  .
  • The injective hull   is a minimal injective module containing   in the sense that if   for an injective module  , then   is (isomorphic to) a submodule of  .
  • If   is an essential submodule of  , then  .
  • Every module   has an injective hull. A construction of the injective hull in terms of homomorphisms  , where   runs through the ideals of  , is given by Fleischer (1968).
  • The dual notion of a projective cover does not always exist for a module, however a flat cover exists for every module.

Ring structure

edit

In some cases, for   a subring of a self-injective ring  , the injective hull of   will also have a ring structure.[2] For instance, taking   to be a full matrix ring over a field, and taking   to be any ring containing every matrix which is zero in all but the last column, the injective hull of the right  -module   is  . For instance, one can take   to be the ring of all upper triangular matrices. However, it is not always the case that the injective hull of a ring has a ring structure, as an example in (Osofsky 1964) shows.

A large class of rings which do have ring structures on their injective hulls are the nonsingular rings.[3] In particular, for an integral domain, the injective hull of the ring (considered as a module over itself) is the field of fractions. The injective hulls of nonsingular rings provide an analogue of the ring of quotients for non-commutative rings, where the absence of the Ore condition may impede the formation of the classical ring of quotients. This type of "ring of quotients" (as these more general "fields of fractions" are called) was pioneered in (Utumi 1956), and the connection to injective hulls was recognized in (Lambek 1963).

Uniform dimension and injective modules

edit

An   module   has finite uniform dimension (=finite rank)   if and only if the injective hull of   is a finite direct sum of   indecomposable submodules.

Generalization

edit

More generally, let   be an abelian category. An object   is an injective hull of an object   if    is an essential extension and   is an injective object.

If   is locally small, satisfies Grothendieck's axiom AB5 and has enough injectives, then every object in   has an injective hull (these three conditions are satisfied by the category of modules over a ring).[4] Every object in a Grothendieck category has an injective hull.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Walther, Uli. "Injective Modules" (PDF). p. 11.
  2. ^ Lam 1999, p. 78–80.
  3. ^ Lam 1999, p. 366.
  4. ^ Section III.2 of (Mitchell 1965)

References

edit
edit