Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Requests for deletions

Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletion on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata^connect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if they are still active on Wikidata and have contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested the deletion of the page in the sitelink's target wiki or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please follow the instructions in Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion instead.

More information

Add a new request

Manual requests
To add a request, you can also add: == {{Q|ITEMID}} == {{rfd links|ITEMID|REASON}} A_reason_why_the_item_should_be deleted. --~~~~ Change ITEMID to the page you want deleted (should be in the form Q###). Please also add a reason (REASON), or it will probably be ignored if it is not an obvious case of vandalism. All requests should go to the bottom of the page.

Bulk deletions
To request the deletion of multiple items for the same reason: Click here

Translate this header box!

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2026/05/17.

Requests for deletions

high

_{~180 open requests for deletions.}

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

Wikidata:Database reports/to delete/completely empty items

if this list is out of date.

Requests

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

Q66480449

Wikimedia surname disambiguation page (Q66480449): type of Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Old RFD (Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/01/21#Wikimedia_disambiguation_page_subclasses) ended due to "withdrawn". For me this surname disambiguation page seems to be existing because of solo project of svwiki sv:Kategori:Efternamnsförgreningssidor. Surnames are different from DAB stuff and shouldn't be messed with each other Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I am not really sure it makes sense to have different types of disambiguation pages. If things are grouped by types then wouldn't they be Wikimedia set index article (Q15623926) instead? I think "types of disambiguation" is really a conflation with a different concept. On the other hand it makes sense that for some disambiguation topics, everything related to that would naturally fit into only one type of thing. These are cases where a disambiguation degrades to effectively be a set index article. Then the main difference would be whether it is tagged as disambiguation or set index as typically the style rules for those two are different. For example since this RfD is about "surname disambiguation page", think of some surname, then consider disambiguation for that topic. There might some items that are named after that surname or coincidentally named the same or similar enough to be there but often everything of note is basically related to that surname so in effect such a page also degrades to an "set index" list. Now if the page is set to be "disambiguation" the rules are tighter but the page can organically grown beyond a "set index" list of only one type of thing but if it is tagged as "set index" it is restricted by type but then freer in how the list of items can be edited and maintained. This is why conversions between these two concepts should not be a problem provided it is done properly but the two concepts should not be conflated with one another and why I believe we do not really need "types of disambiguation" as a concept. —Uzume (talk) 03:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Also courtesy ping for the creator: user:Moebeus--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate the courtesy and won't be protesting your request:) Moebeus (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I like having separate items that are (in most cases) conceptually distinct but I also see the disadvantages. I'd still slightly vote for keep. And what about Q22808320? As MisterSynergy wrote at the preceding RFD, "Whatever we do to Q22808320 should be done to those ones as well." (i.e. to Q66480449 and Q61996773). Adam78 (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Leni Parker (Q5255449)

LENI PARKER (Q5255449): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Photo obtained without owners/Leni Parker's consent.

Bulk deletion request of items created by User:XsLiDian

May not be "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entities that can be described using serious and publicly available references" (Wikidata:Notability). The misuse of subclass of (P279) makes Q133820253 a Q327333, a Q49848 and a Q1255828 at the same time, which is clearly wrong. dringsim 18:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep They are subclasses to create instances from. For example, for the document :File:湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (2025年1月17日).pdf, I create 湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (2025年1月17日) (document instance) from 湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (subclass), which is subclass of other appropriate subclasses.

All subclasses I used for documents can be verifable with a legit document already uploaded to Commons, which can then be verified in-person with respective authorities (government, court etc). If you suspect I uploaded false documents, you have a chance to put me in jail, because forging them is forbidden by the criminal law of my residence. XsLiDian (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

This is about notability on Wikidata, not about truth. If these are documents on Commons, could you add links to these Commons files (probably using image property)? I think this would be enough to prove notability. MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 14:05, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

See also the tree of the classes of Q133820253, which is currently messy. dringsim 05:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Q131542196

stackable concrete block (Q131542196): architectural element, roadblock, wall: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

said to be the same as (P460) claim on Nice stones (Q28058815), which seems similarly non-notable, despite it having an intentional sitelink to redirect (Q70894304) to dewiki. Tæppa (talk) 04:59, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

What about it seems non-notable? They seem like a clearly defined concept which has many mentions in reliable sources, which means they probably pass GNG by Wikidata standards.StarTrekker (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

The items presently don't read as being clearly identifiable. The English name "Nice stones" appears to have been coined by Wikimedia Commons. Tæppa (talk) 23:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

That's unfortunate but the English being 'original research' doesn't change that the original language version seems to exist as a concept.StarTrekker (talk) 10:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

I tend to agree that Nice stones (Q28058815) is notable since it is described in de.wp and also (at least) mentioned in some German news articles. If Nice stones (Q28058815) is a subclass of stackable concrete block (Q131542196), I would withdraw this RfD -- do we know if this assumption is correct? --Dorades (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Nice stones (Q28058815) reads as being a german alias / nickname of stackable concrete block (Q131542196) rather than being conceptually different. Tæppa (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

According to the Commons category and de.wp, it’s the other way around: stackable concrete block are a subclass of Nice stones since they also include things like commons:File:KFZ_-_Sperren_aus_Beton_-_Nizza_Sperre_-_Dresden.jpg. It’s doubtful however that this is the case off-wiki. --Emu (talk) 12:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

"locations of [museum collection] with works not on display"

1. Q131294014 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q126596695 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q130467769 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q29343881 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q125375828 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q30068277 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

These items don't make any sense. Not sure how DeltaBot will respond but in order the number of uses are: 4, 71, 2, 47, 6, 20. For example Pope Leo XIII (Q29906076) (painting) is location (P276) locations of the Neue Pinakothek with works not on display (Q125375828). It should go without saying that a second opinion from someone who is familiar with how museum collections are handled on wikidata is needed before/if these are to be deleted, but I'm nominating them on the basis they don't pass WD:N3 (structural need to make items useful) as a non-location is not a useful location statement. Tæppa (talk) 18:02, 13 July 2025 (UTC)

Tubezlob VIGNERON Jane023 Pigsonthewing Ambrosiani Spinster Wittylama Fuzheado Daniel Mietchen Marsupium Martingggg Anne-LaureM Beat Estermann Manu1400 Mauricio V. Genta Patafisik MartinPoulter Tris T7 BeatrixBelibaste Clifflandis Mrtngrsbch Reciproque Weadock313 (talk) 21:56, 27 November 2019 (UTC) ProtoplasmaKid Crowjane7 Scarey1 (talk) 11:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC) Zblace Suna no onna Antoine2711 S.v.Mering Stefan Karl C3r098 Tderflinger

Notified participants of WikiProject Museums --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

These items are used to describe the location of objects in museum depots whose more precise location is not known. --Marsupium (talk) 20:54, 26 July 2025 (UTC)

Though I applaud the attempt to create overviews of works on show, there is no way we will ever be accurate in this, and using the location of the museum is the best way for a member of the public to be informed about the location of the work, whether it's in depot or not. Most depots are very dynamic as the collection often earns money (or saves money on insurance payments) by lending works long or short term to exhibitions. A location statement with the museum is not incorrect, even if the painting is not on show, as the museum is the main contact. That said, some museums are so notorious for clinging to their ownership (possibly for insurance reasons) that they have works out on loan for over a century. National museums like the Rijksmuseum or Louvre come to mind. Even under those circumstances however, the painting may not be on show in the museum that "holds" it. I therefore find using the holding institution as the location as the more precise information, unless specific dates can be given (which I sometimes add for exhibitions when no other location data is known for works held in private collections). Jane023 (talk) 05:32, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Just as an extra tip to others reading here: I always make a point of asking at the front desk for paintings that I feel should be on show (or on better display), even when I know the answer. Having spent some time in museums I know that some do record the questions asked by the public. Jane023 (talk) 05:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Q134964239

weere (Q134964239): LGBTQ+ social and dating platform created by misterb&b: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Meets WD:N #3 (structural need): Part of existing Q17113889.

Paspal (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete notability not reached.^{Happy New Year 2026!}Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 11:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: "list of Wikidata reasons for" items

• list of Wikidata reasons for deprecation (Q52105174): Wikidata internal entity list: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)
• list of Wikidata reasons for preferred rank (Q76637123): Wikidata internal entity list: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Incorrect modelling. "List" created by has part(s) statements. All the items of each "list" can be inferred by querying for instance of or subclass of Wikibase reason for deprecated rank (Q27949697) or Wikibase reason for preferred rank (Q71533077). Destined to be woefully out of date, if it isn't already. William Graham (talk) 01:56, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

• The list of reasons for deprecation links to Help:Deprecation/List of Reasons for Deprecation, it would be useful to have something similar for preferred rank and to link them from the "Wikibase reason" items (and to include instances of subclasses, such as better described by P807 "separated from" (Q106651934), an instance of improper use of Wikidata property (Q107278014)). The P527 statements can be removed. Peter James (talk) 10:52, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Q75500610

list of Wikidata identifiers (Q75500610): list: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

"list of Wikidata" type item that has no meaningful use. William Graham (talk) 02:02, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Keep, in relation with Wikidata:WikiProject Supertemplates/doc/All properties, a project to make a documentation of Wikidata properties. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 07:42, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Can you explain how this item furthers the goal of that project? Best I can tell this item doesn't have any real use other than being linked to a page in Wikidata namespace. Also that Wikiproject appears to largely be inactive. William Graham (talk) 20:48, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

Q105827064

ministry extinction (Q105827064): event in which a ministry is closed, usually due to a change in management: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't seem useful -- what makes a ministry extinction functionally different from any other extinction (Q105766453)? This item's only use is as a reason for deprecation of the first 'inception' value of Ministry of Infrastructure (Q10330382). The original date probably shouldn't be deprecated at all as it isn't false (the ministry closed then later reopened). IagoQnsi (talk) 18:33, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:41, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

I described one of these links above, and the other link is from list of Wikidata reasons for deprecation (Q52105174) – not a reason to keep. –IagoQnsi (talk) 17:36, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

It's something that could possibly be more useful as a end cause (P1534) qualifier on a related item where Q105766453 could refer to subject or object of a statement, but it is currently not used for that, and there is likely to be a better qualifier to use (or one that could be created). In Q10330382, it seems to be a new ministry with the same name and there should probably be separate items, so refers to different subject (Q28091153) would be the correct qualifier (unless it was only renamed, not abolished, or the abolition was overturned or reversed). Peter James (talk) 11:09, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete no need for this subclass. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 06:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Q135656125

Roll of the Baronage of Scotland (Q135656125): public record registering barons and all titles in the Baronage of Scotland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Non-notable, promotional item does not meet notability requirements. No valid sitelinks --Nayyn (talk) 10:06, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Please see the discussion here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_483#baronage.com about the reliable of this supposed source Nayyn (talk) 12:57, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Q97398057

Antoin Commane, Baron Bailie of Kinfauns Yr (Q97398057): son and heir of Fergus, 26th Lord Kinfauns, Chief of Clan Commane: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, no valid sitelinks --Nayyn (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:11, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

The linkages to this are no longer accurate, the linkages were to unreliable sources and appear promotional Nayyn (talk) 12:56, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Q135678404

Maria, Lady Kinfauns (Q135678404): wife of Lord Kinfauns, Irish Clan Chief: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, no valid sitelinks --Nayyn (talk) 10:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:41, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Q135656125

Roll of the Baronage of Scotland (Q135656125): public record registering barons and all titles in the Baronage of Scotland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Non-notable, no valid sitelinks to item, promotional entry --Nayyn (talk) 10:39, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 7 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:41, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

The reliability of this item to be used as a reliable source is contentious and appears to be used in a promotional capacity, please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_483#baronage.com Nayyn (talk) 12:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Can't find any official record of this or its parent organisation the "Baronage of Scotland Association" But unless there is evidence it's producing fake information then I think it should be considered in the same way as other personal genealogy websites like The Peerage (Q21401824) Piecesofuk (talk) 09:23, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Q124357179

Anil Bhattarai (Q124357179): Nepali Entrepreneur and Journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No notability --47.38.138.157 06:43, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

 Comment the item is existed and passed several checks and patrols, some by admin. The item had various identifiers, however, some of them are self made (like ORCID ID ), I am more leaning toward  Delete. ^{Happy New Year 2026!}Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 11:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Q117012262

Q117012262: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

(Feedback needed). I was looking at issued by (P2378) and this item is it's Wikidata item of this property (P1629) claim, but it's unsused and only has a japanese label & description - which translate to "identifier issuer" and "The organization that issues the identifier". Nominating on the grounds of N2 (conceptual entity) as I am unable to conceptualise what it is. Maybe issued by (P2378) requires a Wikidata item of this property (P1629) statement, but I fail to see how Q117012262 in it's present state (3 meaningless claims) is useful, instead of making P2378 an exception on whatever constraint property is complaining (if that's the case). --Tæppa (talk) 18:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:21, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Q136210742

Xggm (Q136210742): family name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spurious creation Quesotiotyo (talk) 20:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

There is an ID, though its popularity don’t make it notable enough—we have to focus on knower family names, if we did so, we can focus on these less known family names (e.g. Xggm (Q136210742)) QwertyZ34 (talk) 20:50, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

There is also Xggf (Q136210737); the "ggm" and "ggf" could refer to great-grandmother and great-grandfather but I'm not sure what the "x" could be. Not family names. Peter James (talk) 01:14, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

And Xgreat (Q136210733) ("No results matching your search on Geneanet. Please try another surname.") Some of the other names with first letter X don't look like real family names; the links work but it's unclear what they are (possibly a placeholder for missing letters). Peter James (talk) 01:21, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

They are probably parts of some double family names: i. e. "Ximenez Clemente" has part: Ximenez (Q37485332) QwertyZ34 (talk) 05:36, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Some, such as Xayaphet (Q136210746), are names but Xxman (Q136210739) is probably not. Peter James (talk) 01:28, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Weird—these are probably family name of East, Southeast Asia origin—therefore these names are ranked low. QwertyZ34 (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Xayaphet is, and several others are real names, but looking again at Xxman, it seems to be Twentyman with "Twenty" replaced by Roman numerals and others may also be abbreviations (such as for "Christ" as part of a name, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/X#Etymology_5). Xgg, Xggm and Xggf and Xgreat are unlikely to be names at all, Xiii is XIII, the regnal number of Louis XIII of France (Q737533), not his family name, Xley seems to be usually written as "...XLEY" suggesting it's incomplete (also a few "PI.XLEY" or "PI-XLEY"), and I don't know what Xcn (or XCn) could be. Peter James (talk) 13:01, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Q115522591

Michel Lunarca hoax (Q115522591): fake person invented for a prank: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax created by a Wikipedian: French press article about it; en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Lunarca; w:fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/26 septembre 2025#Encore un canular ? Thibaut (talk) 08:47, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Even if it's a hoax I still think we should  Keep the item and flag it as a hoax as it's reported as true in reliable sources like Le Figaro (Q216047) La savoureuse histoire du «croque-monsieur» Piecesofuk (talk) 09:09, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

This article from the Figaro and the book it references are classic examples of WP:CIRCULAR. Thibaut (talk) 09:29, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

 Delete. For reasons of reliability, hoaxes originating from vandalism should not be kept. The Figaro article and the book do not qualify as reliable sources, as they merely repeat the false claim — an instance of WP:CIRCULAR, as Thibaut has pointed out. --Guise (talk) 09:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

There are examples of hoaxes being kept in Wikidata. Even a recent Wikipedia hoax got its own Wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_MacMasters_hoax Piecesofuk (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

 Keep as long as the item is about the hoax itself. Meets WD:N#2 with [1]. Skyshifter ^talk 22:13, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Q118809656

Q118809656: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don't see the difference with Plateau-des-Petites-Roches (Q60025976) (but clearly with Q2028849), but if there is it should be clarified. Arancycn (talk) 23:37, 27 September 2025 (UTC) --Arancycn (talk) 23:37, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Ping @Arpyia. Fralambert (talk) 12:22, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request “TV 1846 Mosbach”

1. Q112678334 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q113989019 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q113989096 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q113989521 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q113990134 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q113990159 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

only mutually linked data objects for which the notability is not displayed Gymnicus (talk) 20:09, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

The "Deutsche Nationalbibliothek" holds issus of its club magazin https://portal.dnb.de/opac/showFullRecord?currentResultId=%22TV%22+and+%22Mosbach%22%26any&currentPosition=0 There are also VIAF and GND identifierers. Granpar (talk) 08:14, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

The data object TV 1846 Mosbach (Q112678334) is now notable due to the added GND identifier. I still don't see any notability for the other data objects. --Gymnicus (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Added P973 and P10862 links. Granpar (talk) 14:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Notability given for Q112678334, thus this bulk deletion has to be stopped.

Paspal (talk) 11:05, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Q118247723/Q123126876

animated television character (Q123126876): fictional character from an animated work on television: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs) animated television character (Q123126876): fictional character from an animated work on television: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item can already inferred from the use of film character and animated character in instance of (P31). Worth pointing out that the person behind the dynamic IP who created (and continues to use this item) have previously been blocked for ignoring modeling, creating countless of constraint errors and not responding to any concerns on their talk page Trade (talk) 02:07, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Valentina.Anitnelav, AVDLCZ, Ymblanter:--Trade (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:23, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

 Delete I agree with Trade. Statements have to be replaced by P31 film character / TV character and animated character. - Valentina.Anitnelav (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

 Delete after replacement. IntensionalLogican (talk) 18:12, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Q119391509

Q119391509: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata item for page removed for G11 from zhwiki SeteQuatroCinco (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

It's an instance of scholarly article (Q13442814). I'm unsure of the notability of this type of item but it's part of a batch of items for articles published in Art Magazine (Q63715802), there was not a Wikipedia article linked to it, and the author's article is still there. Was this deletion request intended for another item with a similar label? Peter James (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2025 (UTC) Different subject, zh:赶街 was deleted in 2014 and this is a scholarly article published in 2018. Google translates the title as "Go shopping"; not surprising if something like that would be spam but in this case it is the title of an article published in Art Magazine (Q63715802). Peter James (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

1. Q109450055 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q109444245 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q112896379 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q123874239 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q108901830 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

All of the Wikidata items named Dewi Sartika, who is a politician, do not have a single article on any Wikimedia project 𝄃𝄃𝄂Badak𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃 🕭 17:18, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Dewi Sartika (Q109450055) and Dewi Sartika (Q109444245) seem to fulfil WD:N 2. Fralambert (talk) 23:12, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@Fralambert In which part does the item meet the notability of WD:N 2? 𝄃𝄃𝄂Badak𝄂𝄀𝄁𝄃 🕭 15:39, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Criterion 2 possibly because of Indonesian parliament candidate ID 2019 (P10043); also criterion 3 for candidacy in election (P3602) - did the deleted items also have P3602 statements? Peter James (talk) 16:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Dewi Sartika Sari (Q108901830) is probably candidate number 3308-00-0000-1406 in 2014 Indonesian People's Representative Council election (Q108816797); because of its deletion, the results of that election in Central Java VIII (Q96984559) district are incomplete. I would like to know if the other deleted items had similar statements. Peter James (talk) 16:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

@Peter James Q112896379 don't have indication the they are a candidate anywhere. Q123874239 was a candidate in 2024 in Q123590947, but the source is list of permanent candidates for DPRD Province 2024 (Q123738477). Fralambert (talk) 03:23, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Grand Decameron Panamá, A Trademark All Inclusive Resort

1. Q111415198 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q136522687 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 08:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Wikidata is a free, collaborative, multilingual, secondary knowledge base, collecting structured data to provide support for Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, the other wikis of the Wikimedia movement, and to anyone in the world. Hotels, ... are always notable for wikivoyage. Granpar (talk) 11:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

What makes you think that we "provide support [...] to anyone in the world"? And how are these items notable according to WD:N? --Dorades (talk) 12:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Passes WDN2. There are tens of thousands of hotels stored in Wikidata, why delete this one? It has nearly 6000 reviews on TripAdvisor https://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Review-g2539283-d301154-Reviews-Grand_Decameron_Panama_A_Trademark_All_inclusive_Resort-El_Farallon_del_Chiru_Cocle_Pr.html Piecesofuk (talk) 18:19, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

TripAdvisor ID (P3134) is a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). Do you see any serious ID or reference present on the item?

There are tens of thousands of hotels stored in Wikidata, why delete this one? I don't see how this could be a reason to keep an item. We have millions of items on people, yet single items on persons are deleted everyday. --Dorades (talk) 20:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

People are not hotels and none have nearly 6000 reviews on TripAdvisor (probably one of the top reviewed hotels in Panama). I believe that TripAdvisor, Skyscanner, Trip.com, Expedia etc are all serious IDs/references. Piecesofuk (talk) 05:49, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

This is not in line with the current status of these properties. I don't need to tell you how to get consensus on a corresponding change. --Dorades (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Used for OSM:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640390878 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640390878 Ternera (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

OpenStreetMap way ID (P10689) is a Wikidata property for an identifier that does not imply notability (Q62589320). --Dorades (talk) 20:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

@Dorades It's still use by OSM, so it fulfil a strutural need there. Fralambert (talk) 21:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

I don't think we should include other databases and websites to be affected by WD#3. Otherwise we wouldn't be able to delete e.g. unnotable artists and even their tracks while they are linked from MusicBrainz. --Dorades (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

The same discussion also takes place regarding the data object Heidecamp (Q125884670) above between me and Fralambert. You keep saying “still in use”. Is that an indirect request to delete it from OpenStreetMap? If so, you must note: While statements like "The data object has a sitelink. Suggest this for deletion first" are legitimate, since we can edit all other Wikimedia projects with our Wikidata account. OpenStreetMap, on the other hand, is not affiliated with Wikimedia, and therefore you can't log into OpenStreetMap using your Wikimedia login credentials. Therefore, such an edit is significantly more difficult here, and we'll have to wait and see whether such a Wikidata link will be deleted after a notice like the one I've created here. --Gymnicus (talk) 09:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Q21115433

Stiv (Q21115433): dog: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Name of a dog --Ezzex (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Was linked in Q1635046#P161 with a reference, but no identifiers and does not appear to be included cast members in other sources. Peter James (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

• Well, it is more or less proved that the dog who 'played' in the movie bore the name Steve (here, for instance; here is more detailed story but the source is not so reliable). Some sources (here, for instance) claim that in real life the dog was owned by Q4293054. Possibly that's enough for keeping the item. Андрей Романенко (talk) 11:01, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Q21115469

Dendy (Q21115469): English Setter: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Name on a dog --Ezzex (talk) 23:35, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Was linked in Q1635046#P161 with a reference, but no identifiers and does not appear to be included cast members in other sources. There is also Q21115499, which was only created to use as a reference for that statement. Peter James (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Q132133377

North West Chilterns Community Board (Q132133377): Community Board of Buckinghamshire Council: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

I think this item could be fixed to make it notable. The website uses an official government domain. Ternera (talk) 20:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Looks like Buckinghamshire Council (Q65052846) (a unitary authority in England (Q21561328)) have restructured their community boards, something that appears to be wholy unique to them and not in use in other councils in England (or the United Kingdom rather), hence the link 404ing. In 2026 we have further restructuring of councils and I was planning on raising the question of how to tag them when that happens (and thus wikidata adjusted, where some users are also advocating to split administrative civil parishes from their namesake village on wikidata). This specific item is no different from the 15 other instances of Buckinghamshire Council Community Board (Q132130388) so any improvements would have to be made to all 16, or the class item Q132130388 . Tæppa (talk) 21:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, are there any working links that describe this board in the meantime? --Dorades (talk) 20:34, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

The web page is archived several times between December 2020 and January 2025.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201202114416/https://www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk/community-and-safety/improving-your-local-community/north-west-chilterns-community-board/

https://web.archive.org/web/20250113023854/https://www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk/community-and-safety/improving-your-local-community/north-west-chilterns-community-board/ Tæppa (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Q63367814

Guardian (Q63367814): Australian retail pharmacy business: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:31, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

It was once a noteworthy pharmacy chain in Australia at the time the item was created. The main reason for creation was inclusion into https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index which allows stores in OpenStreetMap to be mapped back to the Wikidata item of the brand/chain.

Guardian no longer exists and has been folded into/rebranded as Amcal. I've added replaced by/replaces statements to both Guardian (Q63367814) and Amcal (Q63367373) with reliable references.

Given that there is reliable public information about the previous Guardian brand/chain of pharmacies, and it's now part of the history of Sigma Healthcare and the Amcal brand/chain of pharmacies where again reliable information is available to reference, I believe the item remains notable as a structural item in Wikidata as part of the history of Sigma Healthcare and Amcal pharmacy brand. Dhx1 (talk) 02:24, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, are there any sources that do not come from the company that owns/owned this chain? There is also currently no OSM ID.--Dorades (talk) 20:15, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request “amateur theaters in RLP”

1. Q122860371 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q122860370 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q122860368 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q122860369 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q122860366 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q122860367 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q122860365 (delete | history | links | logs)
8. Q122860363 (delete | history | links | logs)
9. Q122860364 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

notability not proven Gymnicus (talk) 19:39, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

 Keep All of this theaters are members of Q122829969 There is a strctural need. Granpar (talk) 06:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Similar to the data object above. If the has part(s) (P527) link is sufficient for relevance, then no further relevance criteria are needed. Everything can be made relevant that way. It should also be noted that, to my knowledge, this modeling of members is not desired. --Gymnicus (talk) 09:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

 Keep WD:N #2 is met.

Paspal (talk) 11:25, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Q131351813

cunhã-poranga (Q131351813): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I'm not sure about this item's notability. I already removed the Wiktionary sitelink per Wikidata:Wiktionary/Sitelinks. Samoasambia ✎ 01:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

 Keep that is under a Q15177520 Topos class --Rodrigo (talk) 20:53, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

@Rodrigo: I don't understand. There is no link between the items cunhã-poranga (Q131351813) and literary topos (Q15177520) on Wikidata. If they have some kind of semantic relationship that should be stated on Wikidata. Samoasambia ✎ 15:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

I mean this is a W:Literary topos so notable term worth to keep. Rodrigo (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

2020–2023 local elections in Germany (Q129179889), Q136721271

Were dewiki pages, which now have been deleted. Doesn't make any sense to keep them now. --Printstream (talk) 13:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

They can be improved similar to Q129332129#Q527. Peter James (talk) 13:39, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

But that's nonsense, the time period is arbitrary; if anything, it should be through new objects for each year. --Printstream (talk) 13:52, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

I don't think it's a good idea to say, for example, 2019 elections were followed by 2024 as although states that held elections in one year also did in the other, the same could not be consistently done for other years, it would not be not be a good idea for navigation templates, and is not entirely true for Saxony - 2019 followed by 2024 should be on the relevant election items for the states. Separate items would be more useful (and would allow linking to Category:2019 elections in Germany (Q32094053), Category:2020 elections in Germany (Q65698085) and similar items consistently) but a split should be done before deletion to avoid breaking the link between 2019 and 2024 (unless they are also to be deleted, instead using Q32094053, Q65698085 and similar items directly and relying on the P31 to say that they are local elections). Peter James (talk) 14:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Q136800678

Innovation Quest 2015 (Cal Poly) (Q136800678): twelfth annual edition of the Innovation Quest student startup competition at California Polytechnic State University in 2015: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:14, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Q167196

City of Kigali (Q167196): duplicate Wikimedia item for Kigali's province-level administrative unit: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

It's a duplicate of Q3859

Lupe (talk) 18:12, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Kateregga1 (talk) 15:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC) Irifasum (talk) 06:49, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Notified participants of WikiProject Rwanda

Rationale

1. “Kigali Province” does not exist as a distinct unit: Rwanda does not maintain a province named *Kigali Province*. The correct designation is the City of Kigali, which functions simultaneously as a city, the national capital, and a province-level administrative unit.

2. The 2006 administrative reform removed the distinction: During Rwanda’s national territorial reform of January 2006, the country reduced its provinces from 12 to 5. As part of this reorganisation:

• the former “Kigali-Ngali” province was dissolved;
• the City of Kigali (Kigali City) was expanded to include the districts of Gasabo, Kicukiro and Nyarugenge;
• the enlarged City of Kigali became a single province-level entity.

Since the 2006 administrative reorganization, the City of Kigali exists as a single unified entity with province-level status. There is no separate 'Kigali Province' government or territory distinct from the city; rather, the city administration itself exercises the authority of a province.

3. Both items currently duplicate identical data: Maintaining two items causes duplication and conflicting information. Both currently require the same statements for:

• population (1.7M+),
• area (~730 km²),
• administrative districts,
• coordinates,
• leadership (Mayor),
• geographical identifiers.

Wikidata policy supports one item per distinct real-world entity, and these two items represent the same one.

Sources

• City of Kigali – Official Overview
• Law No. 22/2019 governing the City of Kigali
• "Organic Law No. 29/2005 of 31/12/2005 Determining the Administrative Entities of Rwanda". Official Gazette of the Republic of Rwanda.
• ISO 3166-2:RW – subdivision codes for Rwanda

--Irifasum (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

@Irifasum If I understand, the adminitrative unit was once existing? That means It would be notable. Fralambert (talk) 00:39, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

@Fralambert I think I phrased my initial request poorly. To clarify: A "Kigali Province" distinct from the city never existed.

What existed prior to the 2006 reform were two separate entities:

• Kigali City (Kigali-Ville) - The urban center.
• Kigali-Rural Province (Kigali-Ngali) - The surrounding rural area.

In 2006, Kigali-Rural (Q388562) was abolished. Its territory was divided: parts were merged into the expanded City of Kigali (specifically Gasabo and Kicukiro districts), while the remaining districts were moved into the Northern and Eastern Provinces.

Therefore:

• Q388562 (Kigali-Rural) is the notable historic administrative unit (and should be kept).
• Q167196 (The current item in question) is currently acting as a duplicate of the modern City of Kigali (Q3859), not the historic province.

Reference for former provinces: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_of_Rwanda#Former_provinces Irifasum (talk) 07:25, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

 Merge with Kigali (Q3859): province-level city, capital and largest city of Rwanda IntensionalLogican (talk) 04:00, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Q135989202

GNU Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool (Q135989202): electronic book published under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

There doesnt seem to be any such ebook. The official website just links to a page with relatively little text Trade (talk) 05:45, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Thoughts? @Vicarage:--Trade (talk) 05:49, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

no opinion Vicarage (talk) 07:22, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

The book is online at https://www.sourceware.org/autobook/, with the full text at https://www.sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_toc.html - but that's already adequately represented by GNU Autoconf, Automake, and Libtool (Q135988886). I don't think it's useful to distinguish between the print edition of the book and a copy of it hosted online. Omphalographer (talk) 06:05, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Does this count as an ebook? Trade (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi ! Yes, Q135989202 refers to an ebook in HTML format which could be updated whereas Q135988886 is about a printed version published in 2000. Genium. 10:54, Dec 1, 2025 (UTC+01:00)

Q136309565

Irina Eduardovna Lazareva (Q136309565): engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable, only used as a relative of Q43262523

Creator: @User:Maxscheller --MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 05:39, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Possibly notable as Q43262523 has a few sitelinks, but Q136309565 has no references and only one identifier Academic Tree ID (P2381). Peter James (talk) 23:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Q23988090

Risco Caído (Q23988090): mountain on Tenerife in Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

It contains incorrect information. The correct item is Q55495511. Probably it was a duplicate item in the beginning. Now there are no linked Wikipedia pages. --TuhansiaVuoria (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Q23988090 is on Tenerife and Q55495511 is on Gran Canaria. It's possible that the coordinates of Q23988090 are imprecise but https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Santa_Cruz_de_Tenerife_la_formaci%C3%B3n_de/QqZIAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=risco+caido+tenerife&dq=risco+caido+tenerife&printsec=frontcover is about Tenerife and probably mentions it. According to https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Diccionario_estadistico_administrativo_d/POALAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=risco+caido+tenerife&pg=PA872&printsec=frontcover there are a few hamlets with the same name, so Q55495511 is the most notable thing with this name, but not the only one. Peter James (talk) 23:38, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for my confusion. The photo is incorrect then. It's for the World Heritage Site on Gran Canaria. The photo gave me an alarm. TuhansiaVuoria (talk) 06:44, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:40, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Q136902228

Big Fat Inc. (Q136902228): American stealth marketing agency active in the late 1990s and early 2000s: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doesn't appear notable. William Graham (talk) 01:07, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

The subject meets Wikidata notability standards. There is significant independent coverage in reliable, editorially controlled publications. This includes The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, AdAge, Fast Company, and other national outlets that have profiled the subject’s marketing work and public activity.

The coverage is not trivial. It spans decades and documents the subject’s role in widely reported campaigns and professional initiatives. This satisfies WD:N through multiple independent secondary sources with substantive content.

The item is a neutral data entry reflecting verifiable public information. It is not promotional. The deletion request should be withdrawn. BringdaThunder (talk) 10:35, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Q137176781

XARION (Q137176781): enterprise in Vienna, Austria: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Low quality sources Midleading (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Structural need for Q133333682  Keep Granpar (talk) 04:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Added some statements Granpar (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

That's a person from the 18th century. --Dorades (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, the creator of the item linked to it. Must be Q137251255 Granpar (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete In my view, neither XARION (Q137176781) nor Balthasar Fischer (Q137251255) has been proven to be notable, disregarding the fact that they are mutually linked. --Gymnicus (talk) 18:35, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

 Keep The company and its founder Balthasar Fischer (Q137251255) were awarded Berthold Leibinger Innovationspreis (Q827980) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berthold_Leibinger_Innovationspreis in 2016 and the link to Wiley (Q1479654) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/latj.201700029 would be enough to pass WDN2. Piecesofuk (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

 Keep per Piecesofuk IntensionalLogican (talk) 06:49, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Q132348179

aurora (Q132348179): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not notable

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:01, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

 Keep One of the author of Bunt wie wir: Ein queeres Mal- und Aktivitätenbuch für alle (Q132345440). Fralambert (talk) 19:28, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

But "instance of: individual animal"? Is this a kind of joke? The official website looks truly like a website of a dog, but i don't think dog can be officially credited as the author of book. MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 06:42, 15 December 2025 (UTC)

See last edit history, someone insists this but originally it was "Human". Wargo (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

From what I can tell, this is someone who is legally and biologically human, and who is doing "identity: dog" for reasons that I'm sure make sense to them. DS (talk) 00:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Where the identity can be verified? Where the subject stated this? Wargo (talk) 23:59, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Official website, as mentioned; if not then https://web.archive.org/web/20251219214911/https://auri.gay/ but that says "robot-dog-thing" and "ΘΔ" - therian (Q25393510)? - not just "dog". They could name their dog as author - one of the authors of Two-, Three-, and Four-Atom Exchange Effects in bcc ³He (Q29597859) is F. D. C. Willard (Q1386318), a cat, but for aurora (Q132348179) it seems to be about an identity, not an actual dog. individual animal (Q26401003) is correct for a human or a dog, it's just that human (Q5) is more precise and expected for some property constraints. This item seems to exist primarily for Bunt wie wir: Ein queeres Mal- und Aktivitätenbuch für alle (Q132345440); is there anything that makes that item notable? Peter James (talk) 22:03, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Q132151444

cheap dangerous online shop (Q132151444): type of online shop which is cheap and dangerous for consumers: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears to have been created purely to criticize sellers of "cheap Chinese goods" Trivialist (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Oppose. It's not criticism by me, it's about that this research topic exist, like every crime does exist even if some people or countries or government have denied.

I created it, just because it's a topic to be known. Pf0al1r (talk) 20:19, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

"this research topic exist" — could you provide any research literature using such terms? —Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 06:57, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

e.g. in english:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/396654577_How_Hazardous_Chemicals_Present_in_Low-Cost_Products_from_Popular_Chinese_Online_Commerce_Shops_Can_Affect_Human_Health

or https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272236568_Dangerous_Substandard_Medicines_An_Increasing_Global_Problem

e.g. in german (translate the pages if you want to understand) https://www.polizei-dein-partner.de/themen/diebstahl-betrug/detailansicht-diebstahl-betrug/artikel/vorsicht-vor-online-shops-aus-fernost.html

it is economic, environmental and danger to health in relation to counterfeit consumer goods

look also about the plagiarism mostly with chinese products, https://www.plagiarius.com/index.php?ID=65 Pf0al1r (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

The publication did not establish the term as succinct exact scientific terminology. The item reflect biased observation towards regional related commercial activity. —Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 23:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I understand, that it's weak in your opinion, but its a fact that this rare term has a huge effect on global economy regarding other economic regions like the EU, or health issues of children.

Even EU authorities and german main news agencies have resarching on this topic to discuss.

So, I disagree. Pf0al1r (talk) 23:13, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete. This is a noun phrase, not a specific entity. Quite frankly, I'm not sure Wikidata is well suited to expressing the existence of this sort of diffuse sentiment, where there's neither a specific source or target. Omphalographer (talk) 22:53, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Oppose. First, I still disagree deleting it.

Second, sure it´s a noun phrase, but some terms in wikidata are noun phrases, even for structural entities

Third, there are scholarly and media articles referenced with this raising topic. Pf0al1r (talk) 13:48, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Q132888438

Belén Morales (Q132888438): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non relevant person. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:53, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Structural need for Q50822527  Keep Granpar (talk) 10:27, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

Structural, but not relevant. Also, no ref included. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 10:30, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Notable. Passes WDN3 as the mother of Aitana (Q50822527) Piecesofuk (talk) 10:41, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete If it's only used as relative of notable person and there's not much useful info nor reliable sources, i think it's unneeded. Documenting all family relations is non-essential. And Help:FAQ/Genealogy says that relatives should be only added if covered by reliable secondary sources. MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

There is a direct link from an item with sitelinks where this is used (Q50822527), and references in the articles there that could probably be added. There is no string version of Property:P25 that can be used similar to how Property:P2093 is used for Property:P50 with no item. Peter James (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Oppose, reason:

If the father passes in this request, why should the mother can not pass? Pf0al1r (talk) 13:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Q19430735

Q19430735: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wmpty Ignacio Rodríguez (talk) 21:05, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment - It was only empty after you removed the eswikisource entry, which has been reverted. Arancycn (talk) 12:15, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment I check the pages from Wikisource project, it should be connected to Diccionario de la lengua castellana (Q19430774) and not this item. A duplicate item?. —Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 13:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

it's a subpage. The subpage for the letter A of the Dictionary. Safe to delete. Ignacio Rodríguez (talk) 02:05, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Q112191513

Makhsati Kengerli Ismail (Q112191513): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person. --Yousiphh (talk) 03:23, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Her name is mentinned in en:Aladdin Allahverdiyev, it may fulfil a structural need. Fralambert (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Q110689191

Kimberlee Granholm (Q110689191): media archivist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Information is not publicly available; site linked is private --~2025-42059-41 (talk) 20:28, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment Mentionned as a interviewer here [2], but most of her data come from her personnal site who is now private. Should be cleaned and blanked of personnal data. Fralambert (talk) 16:47, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Q136363530

Capita seu praeceptiones sententiosae (Orelli edition, 1819) (Q136363530): edition of Nilus of Sinai’s Capita seu praeceptiones sententiosae, published in Leipzig 1819 in Orelli’s Opuscula Graecorum veterum sententiosa et moralia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Redundant item, not standalone edition Sms116 (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Q70250066

GNU maintainer (Q70250066): maintainer of a GNU program on behalf of the GNU Project: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item and its subclasses all seem to have been made-up by User:Genium Quesotiotyo (talk) 04:11, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

It's not made-up, strictly speaking. For Bruno Haible, for example, it's sourced from official GNU website. But i do think it's useless as the same could be modeled via position = software maintainer; affiliated with = GNU project or something like that. And we defininitely don't want a subclass for every small project. MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

 Delete per MSDN.WhiteKnight; many of the linked items should be removed as well (replacing them with relationships which don't involve a single-purpose entity). Creating unique entities to represent maintainership of specific projects, or maintainership of a project which is affiliated with GNU, is an unhelpful complication - in particular, it makes it more difficult to query the database to find maintainers of a software project. Omphalographer (talk) 00:27, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

I agree  Delete. I believe the way to model these is just to have maintained by (P126) on the project item as in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18968627#P126 Then on the maintainer's items an occupation (P106) software maintainer (Q1420140). You can view what a person is maintaining by clicking on "show derived statements" (you may need to enable "relatedItems" in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets ) I think position held (P39) should only be for more official roles eg politician (Q82955) Piecesofuk (talk) 10:37, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

It's interested to show the position held as in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ludovic_Court%C3%A8s and that's the role of Wikidata allowing that. Genium. 13:28, Dec 26, 2025 (UTC+01:00)

A position related to each GNU package is a subclass of this item, which is a lot of of people over the years. This is the best way to organize this data. For example, for GNU Emacs, there have been many GNU Emacs maintainers over the years, each one was also known GNU maintainer. The same for each package. I plan to contribute on this for the next twenty years.  Keep, thankyou. Genium. 18:28, Dec 25, 2025 (UTC+01:00)

Q64697910

Bob haircut with hair clips on both sides (Q64697910): a short hairstyle for women, secured only by hair clips on both sides of the hair (common in 20th-century China): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The name has no reliable source, but this hairstyle was particularly common in 20th-century China ([3][4] and this). Its characteristic feature is a short, ear-length hairstyle with hair clips on both sides. --Thyj (talk) 18:09, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

It also appeared in the 1974 film "Reconnaissance Across the Yangtze".[5] Thyj (talk) 01:03, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

@Thyj There's nothing in https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coiffure_homonyme or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eponymous_hairstyle to suggest that the hairstyle is notable, although these two articles are probably Western-biased. I don't think the sources listed above are enough to establish notability, the last one seems to be a fan page. Also they seem to be in Chinese, is there anything relevant that can be found in Thai sources since this seems to be related to a Thai princess? Also this item is currently linked to from Sirindhorn, Princess Royal (Q1884754) (the hairstyle was named after her) and Jiang Dehua (Q137351586). If there's a reliable source for the latter, then it might be enough to establish notability otherwise I suggest you replace hair style / hair length (P8839) on those two items with something more appropriate eg bob cut (Q370366) and then it can be deleted. Piecesofuk (talk) 10:25, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Perhaps a more suitable name could be chosen. Thyj (talk) 16:56, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

I don't know the name of this hairstyle, so don't associate it with Sirindhorn. Thyj (talk) 03:41, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Q122981581

white hole cosmology (Q122981581): Cosmological model in which the observable universe is the interior of a white hole: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This apparently refers to a fringe pseudoscientific theory of cosmology [6]. There are no links to any Wikimedia project. The item was created with reference to Creation Wiki (Q116414222), which is not a reliable source. Mention in Creation Wiki (Q116414222) or RationalWiki (Q6961180) does not imply notability, as expliciticly noted in RationalWiki ID (P7775). The item does link to some scientific papers, but these seem to be different than (and hence not to be conflated with) the fringe creationist pseudoscientific theory. --Charp238 (talk) 02:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:50, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

 Comment The concept is legit and represent study in physics domain. Its existence established by article in APS journal. If you feel that this is a "fringe pseudoscientific theory of cosmology" due to existence of unreliable source. You could reframe the description and remove the unreliable source. Why erase the entire item? —Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 08:03, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Q12479959

list of Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Malacca (Q12479959): Wikimedia list article: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

list of Yang di-Pertua Negeri of Malacca (Q12479959): Wikimedia list article apparently all of the pages except en is not linking to a Wikipedia list page, and the en one has been reduced to a redirect. I have merged all the rest to the main page item, Q123398319. Due to obviously notability reasons I don't see this item still need to remain. --HanayoPlus LP (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

The Thai and Indonesian articles are lists, should they be connected to Q12479959 or Q123398319? Peter James (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

1. Q128585209 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q130216190 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q130216249 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q56598954 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q55106969 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non-existent Hungarian double first names, continuation of this request Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2026/01/09#Q128706085
@StarTrekker, Moebeus: Pallor (talk) 09:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC) Pallor (talk) 09:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Comment Some of these are listed in other languages like Czech and Portuguese, so I would not support deleting those on the basis that they don't exist in Hungarian. If the names are listed in only Hungarian, then support delete.StarTrekker (talk) 09:54, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Anna-Mária (Q130216249) is used on Anna-Mária Erdman (Q136612673) (Czech person). Others don't have uses. Samoasambia ✎ 13:51, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Q128585209 has a Commons category, but I have nominated it for deletion as it is empty. Peter James (talk) 14:01, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Of course, if we know for certain that these double names exist in other languages, then they should remain. However, they were only included as Hungarian names (their use is already more limited due to the accents).

But are we sure that the institution of double middle names also exists in Slavic-speaking areas? Isn't it simply a case of someone being called both Anna and Mária, with a hyphen between the two first names? Could someone look up when the Czech name day for "Anna-Mária" is? Pallor (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

People don't generally have hyphens between their given names unless it's a double name, I don't really see why else they would? Does a name need to have a name day in Slavic countries to be a 'real' name?StarTrekker (talk) 12:19, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

From the first sentence, I can only agree with the phrase "generally": in Romanian, hyphens are often used between family names and first names to indicate that the middle name can be considered a family name or a first name. This does not necessarily mean that either of them is a double name, and in the case of minorities in Romania, this is certainly not the case. The answer to your question in the second sentence is that, of course, in cultures where name days are observed and celebrated, the hyphenated version must also have a name day. If, for example, there are separate name days for Anna and Maria, which are celebrated separately by the persons concerned, then their names are Anna and Maria, not Anna-Maria (to avoid misunderstanding, I would like to clarify here that Annamária, which is very similar to the names in the example, is obviously a separate given name).

Obviously, I am not questioning the combination of the first names Jean-Paul Belmondo or Hans-Dietrich Genscher, but rather the fact that a series of elements containing such name combinations have been created in several languages, which I do not see as substantiated.

I still maintain that there are no hyphenated first names in the Hungarian language, and any element containing such a hyphen should be deleted. The Hungarian set of first names can be verified; all Hungarian first names are listed in a very long, continuously updated list, which does not contain any hyphenated names. Whether they exist in other languages must be substantiated by the creator with sources. I admit that I am not familiar with the nomenclature of all languages, and I sincerely hope that the hundreds of double first names created are based on actual knowledge and sources, not just guesswork. Pallor (talk) 13:10, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I'm still not sure exactly what you mean about the name days. In Sweden we also have name days, but hundreds of thousands of names don't have a day for them, they're still real names. Do you have any evidence to support that names in Slavic countries must have a name day to be a real name? I find that hard to believe.StarTrekker (talk) 09:31, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I wrote that I am not familiar with the nomenclature of all languages, but I also wrote that in many languages, the hyphen does not create a new name, but rather two separate first names. But let's cut to the chase: please provide the sources you used when processing Slavic first names. There will be no better proof of the existence of the names in question. Pallor (talk) 11:05, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't have sources for all these specific items; 1) because I did not create all of these items, 2) because the ones I did make were made as parallels to well established double names in other languages, which is pretty standard practise. I'm willing to accept the idea that they should be deleted (those I created as well as the other ones), but I'm just expressing that not sure I agree with all your reasonings here. (Related; it seems according to this, that double names do exist in Russia. So at the very least in that country they're not a legal impossibility. Tho maybe they're unusual? Article isn't clear about what makes the name odd.)StarTrekker (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

OK. I myself am not aware of any linguistic sources for Slavic double names.

It seems to me that you have created an entry for every name in which you found a hyphen—or there was no hyphen, but you considered them to belong together—but it has been proven that these names did not exist in at least two languages: Hungarian and Romanian (there may be double names in Romanian, I have no information about this, but it is certain that not all names written with a hyphen are double names). Therefore, I do not rule out the possibility that some double names exist, but sources are needed to support this. If we consider the hyphen to be the most important evidence of the existence of names, we can easily fall into the trap of creating an alternative universe on Wikidata that does not exist in reality, which is obviously not the aim of the project. In light of the above, I maintain my proposal to delete these names. Pallor (talk) 13:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay I just want to make it clear again that I'm not the one who has created every double name or hyphenated name (listed here or otherwise) item. As for those types of names in Hungarian or Romanian, I'm willing to accept your assertion that those types of names don't exist in those languages/cultures, but you have hardly "proven" it, you've made several claims, without sources. Now it may very well be correct, but so far your claims don't have any more sources than anyone else here.StarTrekker (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

In Hungary, the Hungarian Academy of Sciences used to determine the list of first names from which names could be chosen for newborns, but a few years ago, this task was transferred to the government. This list is constantly expanding and is published regularly. The most recent list I found was published in September 2025 and includes the decree number and a list of female and male names. Names that are not on the list cannot be given to newborns, but it is possible to apply for permission to use a name that is not on the list, which may be approved or rejected. If approved, it will be included in the next list, and from then on, anyone can give it to a newborn.

The name "Mária Antónia" is not included in the list, but the names Mária and Antónia are. The names "Mária Anna" and "Anna-Mária" are not included, but the names Mária, Anna, and Annamária are. "Mária Izabella" is not included, but Mária and Izabella are. "Mária Terézia" is not included, but Mária and Terézia are. These statements can be verified on this website:

https://nytud.hu/oldal/utonevjegyzek

Since it is in Hungarian, here is a little help: the first document contains male names (in Hungarian: "Férfinevek"), the second document contains female names (in Hungarian: "Női nevek").

In addition, there are names that can be used by the 13 recognized nationalities in Hungary, which can be given to children by families living here who are Hungarian citizens but not of Hungarian nationality. Lists of these names are always available on the websites of the national minority self-governments, but these are obviously not Hungarian names, although they can be registered in Hungary if the above conditions are met.

So there is a source that supports what I wrote. Pallor (talk) 18:21, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Well that settles it for Hungarian names (since at least the establishment of this name legislation).StarTrekker (talk) 15:17, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Q131201966

Bestico (Q131201966): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:09, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

@Arpyia: (the item's creator). --Wolverène (talk) 19:37, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi Wolverène, it fulfils notability criteria as "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." Example https://www.filieres-avicoles.com/actualites/appi-devient-bestico Best regards, Arpyia (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

The Big Bang Theory characters

Some secondary characters which have no sitelinks or independent (non-wiki) IDs and some even doesn't appear in series: V. M. Koothrappali (Q137697648), Mrs. Koothrappali (Q137638819), Q137699029, Q137734006, Q137723876 and God knows how many else in https://w.wiki/HPLS --Infovarius (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Q137431181, Q137431251, Q137431487, Q137739182... User:CallumBen13 continues to create non-notable items. Infovarius (talk) 00:07, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok. I will stop making Wikidata items for The Big Bang Theory characters. CallumBen13 (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I've deleted some which probably aren't notable. I'll leave the rest up to others. EPIC (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Q33227312

Jacques Baudy de Geyer d'Orth (Q33227312): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I created the item a long time ago because this person was on WhosWho, but he no longer seems to have a profile on the site. I can't find any other public and reliable information about him. I propose deleting it for WD:N ---Framawiki (please notify !) (talk) 11:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

There is https://www.whoswho.fr/biographie/jacques-baudy-de-geyer-dorth-3151 - the site's URLs have changed, and two of the three examples in Property:P4124#P1855 don't work and the other redirects to a page about a different person. Peter James (talk) 12:15, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

@Peter James thanks for the link, we need to fix this WW property link problem someday.

By definition, people in the who's who have a clear notability and search on their name give us number of mentions, which is why I imported them without checking each one.

This specific one seems to be the counterexample, as I only see the who's who and only appearances in lists of people, not even a page focused on him. His only official distinction is that he is a substitute [7]. I don't see any other references, and it seems to me that it doesn't sufficiently meet the criteria for WD:N. -Framawiki (please notify !) (talk) 13:07, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

fixed the Who's Who in France biography ID Granpar (talk) 09:26, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Q137744546

Narayan (Q137744546): Indian painter and artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

LTA 249 again; awaiting action on multiple client projects Bovlb (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Should it be deleted when the page has five interwiki links? (please ping if you have a message I should see)
- Sarrus (c • t) 18:31, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sarrus All five are under deletion request. That was the "awaiting action on multiple client projects" part of my original message. These pages were all created by a long-term abuser who keeps creating new accounts to evade their global lock. Bovlb (talk) 19:02, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Bovlb: Ah, you'll await deletion here until local deletions (maybe) are done.
- Sarrus (c • t) 19:12, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Sarrus Right. This entry is a reminder for us to go back and revisit. Otherwise I would just have deleted it. Bovlb (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Steverhode

1. Q137754128 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q137754461 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q137754472 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q137754540 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q137754564 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q137754663 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

walled-garden with no strong notability Bovlb (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I was told that someone else had to enter the notability links. Can I do it myself? ~2026-26016-0 (talk) 21:06, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback. I'll work on improving this entry with additional connections and sources.

Notability evidence:

Author of "The Path to Happiness and Wealth" (Washington Post Personal Finance Book of the Month, reviewed by Michelle Singletary)

HuffPost contributing writer (published articles under byline)

Television appearances: FOX News, CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC discussing consumer debt

Invited to UK Parliament to discuss financial literacy (2007)

Founded Debt Counselors of America/Myvesta (1994-2006), a nonprofit credit counseling organization

Host of "Get Out of Debt Guy" podcast (Apple Podcasts since 2009, ID: 328877550)

I'll add connections to relevant Wikidata items (publishers, media organizations, Parliament) to address the walled-garden concern. Would you suggest any specific items I should link to? Steverhode (talk) 21:08, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I would  Keep Steve Rhode (Q137754128) because of the existence of https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2003043099.html and there's plenty of historical newspaper coverage of him https://www.newspapers.com/search/results/?date-end=2026&date-start=1990&keyword=%22Steve+Rhode%22+debt Piecesofuk (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for observing that. Yes, I have 30 years of accomplishments as a consumer advocate, author, search and rescue pilot, etc. I'm just new at adding information here and did the best I knew how to do as a total newbie so if I should come back and add more infromation like https://www.huffpost.com/author/steve-rhode or https://books.apple.com/us/book/the-path-to-happiness-and-wealth/id380576319?see-all=reviews or https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/articles-by-author/steve-rhode I can do it. I guess I just need a bit of guidance and I'll do the work. Steverhode (talk) 14:57, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@ Steverhode Bovlb (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Q109240822

The Public Humanities summer comes to an end: a small statistical evaluation (Q109240822): blog post in publicdh.hypotheses.org, 2021: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:10, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Notable, bibliographic metadata. Jeb (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

How does it comply with WD:N in your view? --Dorades (talk) 20:33, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Keep per Jeb (pass of 2) PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:15, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Blog posts aren't automatically notable as bibliographic items. Does not seem like it's blog by experts that can be used as reliable source for statements, so it can be deleted. MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Anything on hypotheses, which is run by openedition, is generally an expert blog. The DHd-AG Digitale Wissenschaftskommunikation und Public Humanities is an established and seemingly reliable organization so I think it would be a fine source. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:43, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

I agree that the author of this text is an expert in her field. But this is not a scientific article, it's a statistical review of articles published in this very blog in form of a blog post. Since journalistic articles are not considered notable per se, I don't see why this text should be notable. --Dorades (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Q130297688

Karalina Saŭka (Q130297688): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Daughter of a linguist --Ezzex (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@Ezzex See http://viaf.org/viaf/118164294864908411049 – if it’s the same person, WD:N #2 notability should be a given. --Emu (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Ok. Ezzex (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Q11921518

Falagián (Q11921518): settlement in Lavalleja Department, Uruguay: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Fake item / Wrong source Muralituy (talk) 03:45, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

The source cited in ca:Falagián seems to have been unreliable for population and it was probably not in the 2004 census, but there is https://geonames.nga.mil/geon-ags/rest/services/RESEARCH/GIS_OUTPUT/MapServer/0/query?outFields=*&where=ufi+%3D+-906703 which is based on https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Uruguay/zV4sAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Falagian&pg=PA36&printsec=frontcover - the source cited there is "Mapa De La República Oriental Del Uruguay, Horacio Ureta Martínez, Barreiro y Ramos, 1949, scale 1:400,000". It is not on the 1:800,000 map from 1950 (https://www.geographicus.com/P/AntiqueMap/republicauruguay-martinez-1950) but the 1:400,000 map (which I could not find) probably shows more places. Peter James (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Check 1:50000 https://igm.gub.uy/geoportal/datos/cartas/G/G26.rar

There is no such settlement. Muralituy (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

 Delete article in cawiki deleted After re reading the sources and by the help of other contributor, I withdraw my vote.Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也}(Talk • Contribs) 10:18, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

 Comment While this probably doesn't meet the notability guidelines, I don't think this is fake. All of Peter James's sources check out, the Defense mapping agency's book cites that Falagián is from the 1:400,000 "Mapa De La República Oriental Del Uruguay". Additionally, after doing some research, there is a business in the nearby town of Minas (the closest town to where Falagián is said to be) named "Escribana Falagián" which seems too good to be a coincidence. IntensionalLogican (talk) 04:47, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

It's fake. There's nothing there. "Falagián" is a surname, and "Escribana" is the university degree, but there is no settlement there. Check aerial imagery.

If the geonames source listed it, then the source is wrong, or poisoned to check for violations of IP. And is not the only error, lots of elements from that site are fake, duplicated, or with ofsett of several kilometers. Muralituy (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

I agree with you that at present there is nothing on the map, I've looked at the aerial imagery. My current hold up is that I can't rule out that there was previously a town there in 1949 when the 1:400,000 Mapa De La República Oriental Del Uruguay was published. It could be a "Paper Town" (poisoned to protect IP) for the Mapa De La República, but I find this hard to believe since it is also present in the Defense Mapping Agency's book, which would supposedly remove these since their goal is to provide accurate military intelligence (although I acknowledge they could have made a mistake and left it in or copied the source map verbatim). You mention "lots of elements from that site are fake, duplicated, or with ofsett of several kilometers" do you have any other examples of these? It would lend more credence to the idea that the Defense Mapping Agency's book is wrong. IntensionalLogican (talk) 07:31, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

1. Q75724136 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q75724138 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q75737184 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q75737186 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q75737614 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q75737616 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q75737617 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Items created from an import from ThePeerage.com, these persons have been removed from the site since. Can't find a proof they ever existed. Melderick (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

The first two cited Burke’s Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage (Q61160654), it looks like the others only cited "e-mail message". Peter James (talk) 22:13, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

When looking for other items about the same people I found Ben Grey Swanson (Q75737614), Ben Swanson (Q96869991) and Ben Swanson (Q135916561) are all about the same age; with Q75737614 there's only the name and age, but with Q96869991 and Q135916561 there's also the link to St Peter's College (Q2487322). Peter James (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Lucy Grey (Q75724136) seems to exist. She's listed on Prabook (Q25328680) under her married name https://prabook.com/web/lucy.swanson/566168 Piecesofuk (talk) 21:16, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Q137803163

Cape Floral Region Protected Areas (Q137803163): UNESCO World Heritage Site in South Africa: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This property was created by me but a similar one already exists. Q1974274 --ElKurashi (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

It's similar, but the World Heritage Site consists of representative areas, not all of the floristic kingdom. Q1974274 mixes the topics, with some sitelinks about one and some about the other. At least two languages (Spanish and Portuguese) have articles for both, and Q107557234 has the sitelinks for the floristic kingdom. Peter James (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Q125778485

Before all ages (Q125778485): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Almost no data and unclear purpose. My guess is that the intention was to indicate the birth time and place of Jesus (Jesus Christ (Q302)) according to Russian Orthodox tradition, but there were practically no useful references except "New Testament", which is not specific and probably not even correct. A reference to an actual book would perhaps make it acceptable, but as long as it is not done, it definitely shouldn't be defined like this. Amir E. Aharoni {{🌎🌍🌏}} talk 15:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep "Before all ages" (sometimes "before all worlds" in English, see English versions of the Nicene Creed (Q17002532)) is part of the Nicene Creed (Q207937), a statement of belief that both the Orthodox and the Catholic church accept (with some small differences that are not relevant here). So the phrase can certainly be sourced and is not specific to the Russian Orthodox at all. In fact, the more general notion of pre-existence of Christ (Q1203161) is very wide-spread among Christian denominations. To that end, I think the three statements you removed from Jesus Christ (Q302) (Special:Diff/2456348011, Special:Diff/2456347965 and Special:Diff/2456347497) should be added back possibly with a stated in (P248) Nicene Creed (Q207937) reference. Warudo (talk) 18:31, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

It's still a bit unclear how it's supposed to be used. It was used as qualifier applies to part = Before all ages on place of birth, which does not make sense to me. How age could be a part of place? For other property it's "criterion used". Perhaps it should actually be object of statement has role (P3831) on birth date? MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Ultimately, what the statement is supposed to say is date of birth (P569)before all ages but, sadly, "before all ages" is not a valid date. So, you're probably right, date of birth (P569)unknown valueobject of statement has role (P3831)Before all ages (Q125778485) is the way to go.

As for place of birth (P19), we need to use applies to part (P518) because there are two births at play here. One is the one that happened before all ages, and the other is Nativity of Jesus (Q51628) which probably happened around 5 BC. For the former, place of birth (P19)unknown value holds but not for the latter for which it is place of birth (P19)Bethlehem (Q5776). Warudo (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Q18506882

San Zeno-San Giuseppe (Q18506882): human settlement in Cassola, Province of Vicenza, Veneto, Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is a composition of Q1850688 and Q98148534 automatically imported --~2026-49144-6 (talk) 09:35, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

It's defined in the census as one place ("centro abitato"). I assume that "Q1850688" is intended to be Q18506881, but most of the sitelinks there are for a place in Costabissara, so I moved the statements about the place in Cassola to a new item San Zeno (Q137858572). Peter James (talk) 15:09, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't believe the Geonames and Serbo-Croatian Wikipedia sources are reliable sources for defining two small hamlets within an Italian municipality...

Read the Italian Wikipedia:

• https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassola
• https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Giuseppe_(Cassola)
• https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Zeno_(Cassola).

In these sources, you can see that San Zeno and San Giuseppe are separate hamlets. Specifically, I'll translate this sentence for you: "Nel 1955 la parte nord del comune di Cassola, allora appartenente al territorio della parrocchia di San Zeno, fu scorporata dando origine alla frazione di San Giuseppe" -> "In 1955, the northern part of the municipality of Cassola, then belonging to the parish of San Zeno, was separated, giving rise to the hamlet of San Giuseppe".

I live near those places and I can confirm that there is not a single town called "San Zeno-San Giuseppe". Adfc (talk) 12:21, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Q136487078

Dipendenza da cocaina e neuromodulazione (TMS):le attuali possibilità di cura - corso ECM FAD (2025) (Q136487078): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:29, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dorades, thanks for the note. I have updated the item by adding public, verifiable sources that do not require authentication: the course page on Accademia Mibes and the “full programme” PDF. I used these sources as references for the key statements (type of course, dates, organiser/provider Akesios Group Srl, and event ID 456482). With these publicly accessible references in place, the event is properly described and the item should meet Wikidata’s notability requirements. Simone Di Pietro (talk) 13:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

It does not, there are no independent sources present at all. Maybe you want to take a look at Wikidata:Self-promotion. --Dorades (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dorades, thanks for the clarification. I understand the point: the sources I added (course page and programme PDF) are provider/partner-controlled and therefore not independent. The official AGENAS event details page is currently not publicly verifiable without authentication, so I can’t use it as an open reference.

Given this, I agree the item shouldn’t be kept and I won’t re-add it unless I can provide independent, publicly accessible third-party coverage. Thanks again. Simone Di Pietro (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Q136439757

TG2 Dossier: I limiti del gioco (22 April 2023) (Q136439757): Episode of TG2 Dossier aired on 22 April 2023: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Dorades (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

This item represents a specific episode of the long-standing Italian investigative news program TG2 Dossier, which is a prominent rubric of the national public broadcaster RAI. The episode, titled 'I limiti del gioco', features scientific experts discussing gambling addiction, a topic of significant public interest. The entry is fully supported by official references from the RAI Press Office and Zenodo, confirming its broadcast date on April 22, 2023. It has been properly structured as part of the series to document the public and scientific contributions of its participants within the database. Simone Di Pietro (talk) 11:13, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

What would be needed are independent sources, not the episode itself or a press release by the corresponding broadcaster. --Dorades (talk) 18:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Dorades, thanks for clarifying. Understood: at the moment this is a standalone item for a single broadcast, and my sources are essentially the broadcaster’s own pages/press material. Since there is no established programme/series item on Wikidata to frame it as an episode record, I agree this does not justify a separate item here. I’m fine with deletion. Simone Di Pietro (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Q3522589

The Saint (Q3522589): 2013 film by Simon West: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This movie doesn't exist Mannivu · ✉ 15:50, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:10, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Based on en:The Saint (2017 film)#Production, this item seems to be for the original pilot of the 2017 film, directed by Simon West. With that being said, I think the best option here would be to merge with The Saint (Q33101653). EPIC (talk) 17:02, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Based on the discovery by EPIC that this is the pilot for The Saint (Q33101653). Notability seems up in the air, but I would lean notable by #3 for The Saint (Q33101653), although it needs to be cleaned up. IntensionalLogican (talk) 00:03, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Q97309629

Make Lists, Not War (Q97309629): website that aggregates best-of lists: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable blog that hosts lists of various things, mostly related to arts and culture. No coverage in serious sources, there's no evidence that author of blog is expert in these areas. The blog aggregates information from various sources without assessing its correctness, so it should not be considered reliable source. It is used a lot to reference statements on artwork items; the query User:MSDN.WhiteKnight/Query_references returns over 3000 uses, for example, movement statement on Sunflowers (Q157541). All these references seems to be mass imported by creator, likely the promotion of this blog. In most cases, the references could be replaced by better sources, such as museum websites or art history books. Even if this blog is the only source available, it does not require having an item, as it's also referenced via reference URL property. So i think it could be deleted, despite numerous usage. Creator: @User:Qono. --MSDN.WhiteKnight (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:10, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

@MSDN.WhiteKnight: that site is a source of bad information. I use the item for the constraint violation on stated in (P248). Clean up is not that easy. In some cases it's just removing the reference, in other cases the whole statement. these edits should be reverted. Not sure if https://editgroups.toolforge.org/b/OR/67e2b8ccec3 is going to work again. Multichill (talk) 12:08, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Q104693251

Edinburgh city centre (Q104693251): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable without any sitelinks, identifiers or uses. All cities have centres. Before enwiki was redirected it was a stub [8] --Tæppa (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

It exists and is notable, and other British cities of similar size have items for city centres; it's just that New Town (Q590710) and Old Town (Q591133) are usually linked to. Peter James (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

I count 23 instances of central business district (Q738570) and 5 of city center (Q1468524) [9], although they don't seem to be distinguished or are instances of both on Newcastle City Centre (Q7017379) and Wrexham City Centre (Q8038127). As WD:N1 and WD:N3 aren't met, I don't see how Edinburgh city centre (Q104693251) in it's present state can be a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity" as all mentions of it are semantically describing the geographic centre of Edinburgh, which Edinburgh (Q23436) (or it's named suburbs) would describe if the various administrative areas were split off. Tæppa (talk) 00:30, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep--Ezzex (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Q109496759

Anne Clin (Q109496759): Wikimedian: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is an item about a living person. This person reported to me that they would like this item to be deleted. --YULdigitalpreservation (talk) 07:13, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

 Keep There are no personal details on the item and according to Wikipedia she's a recent Wikimedia Laureate Piecesofuk (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

 Comment @YULdigitalpreservation I would be better that she do a demand to the Wikidata:Oversight. Become a Wikimedia laureate did made her notable here as Piecesofuk says. Even if the goal is separate her account from her name, this is a oversight job. Fralambert (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Q137915329

Die Inkognito-Philosophin (Q137915329): Interdisciplinary journal (ISSN 3052-9182): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Despite having entries in registries such as ISSN, this is just a weblog. Dorades (talk) 20:25, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Actually I have been one of the most famous webloggerdue to the Finantial Times:

https://www.ft.com/content/87706c4e-57be-11db-be9f-0000779e2340

I'll be glad to send you pdf of the article if you are not logged in the FT website. Roberto Nicolai (talk) 17:03, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I don't know what you are referring to and what your connection to this item is, but the blog is not mentioned in this article from 2006. --Dorades (talk) 13:26, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply.

In the Financial Times article “European bloggers find their voice” (10 October 2006), Robinik.net is mentioned in the section referring to Italian blogs. I may not have pointed to the exact passage clearly before; I can provide the excerpt if needed.

In addition, the blog is also mentioned in an article from TGcom24:

https://www.tgcom24.mediaset.it/tgtech/articoli/331166/web-i-blog-piu-influenti-del-mondo.shtml

For this reason I tried to create an item for the blog itself, supported by these sources, but it was deleted as a duplicate of my personal item. I may have misunderstood the correct procedure.

Could you clarify what would be the proper way to document a blog that is cited in independent sources like these?

Thank you. Roberto Nicolai (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

If I get you right, there is no connection to the item in question. Regarding this other item, you have already been advised on your user talk page on how to appeal a deletion decision. --Dorades (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I understand that the correct way is to appeal the deletion through the procedure indicated on my user talk page, and I will follow that process.

I appreciate your guidance. Roberto Nicolai (talk) 07:51, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

 Delete and delete Tamara Niebler (Q137915353) who appears to be the person behind these items. IntensionalLogican (talk) 01:50, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Item has an GND ID Granpar (talk) 13:02, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q66477411

Italy (Q66477411): constituency of the European Parliament: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

For EU elections, Italy is, and has always been, divided into 5 constituencies:

• Central Italy (Q3677909): constituency of the European Parliament;
• Italian Islands (Q3677910): constituency of the European Parliament;
• Southern Italy (Q3677912): constituency of the European Parliament;
• North-West Italy (Q3677915): constituency of the European Parliament;
• North-East Italy (Q3677916): constituency of the European Parliament.

Italy in itself is not a constituency of the European Parliament.

Best regards, Albgr03 (talk). 08:41, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

This should be fixed now.

Best regards, Albgr03 (talk). 12:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

I think this is the "collegio unico nazionale" mentioned in it:Elezioni europee del 2024 in Italia and other articles. Peter James (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

You might be right, although it seems to refer to the electoral system in use. I also wonder if it's notable enough to warrant an entity. Best regards, Albgr03 (talk). 10:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Q112947279

organ of the catholic church of St Albertus Magnus, Cologne (Q112947279): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lack of notability --MeAmME (talk) 11:59, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Created a commons category Granpar (talk) 12:15, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

 Comment @Granpar Commons categories don't establish notability, but I'm not sur of ‎Organ Index ID (P13889). It's a wiki but seem well documented. Another advice would be welcome. Fralambert (talk) 20:26, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Then delete all 5,374 items with a P13889 statement. Too many items are excluded here, and this makes Wikidata itself unnotable. Granpar (talk) 06:41, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Q109474309

Gabriel Mercuri (Q109474309): diver from Swiss: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The young diver in the photo has stopped competing and no longer wishes for this photo to be available online. --~2026-10547-95 (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:50, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Submitting a deletion request here on Wikidata will not delete the photo from Wikimedia Commons. Granpar (talk) 12:22, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Q134726858

Q134726858: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not shown Gymnicus (talk) 23:52, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Structural need for Q1389754 which is clearly notable Granpar (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

There is absolutely no structural need. Hence the question: Have you even checked that statement? The statement Q134726858parent organization or unit (P749)Media Authority of Saxony-Anhalt (Q1389754) is, in my view, complete nonsense. Although I certainly understand why it was added. The Media Authority of Saxony-Anhalt is the same for Q134726858 as it is for Radio SAW. It is the regulatory authority. The German translation “Aufsichtsbehörde” is an alias of the property parent organization or unit (P749) and that is why the statement was added. And before you bring this up, the statement Q134726858editor-in-chief (P5769)Daniel Baumann (Q60711084) is unsubstantiated and nowhere can it be found that the notable person Daniel Baumann was the editor-in-chief of Q134726858. --Gymnicus (talk) 15:03, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Q81166024

Age of Autism (Q81166024): website: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item refers to an English-language anti-vaccination website. There are no mentions of this website on any Wikimedia page, and does not appear to be notable. There is a page on it on RationalWiki (Q6961180), but this is one of the sources that do not imply notability on Wikidata (see RationalWiki ID (P7775)). Charp238 (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

@Charp238 It's use as a reference for Diagnostic politics: the curious case of Kanner’s syndrome (Q48435994). Fralambert (talk) 18:46, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Notable website. There are articles directly mentioning it in two Wikipedias: https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Olmsted#The_Age_of_Autism and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Olmsted#L'%C3%82ge_de_l'autisme and both link to the website Piecesofuk (talk) 09:52, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Q27525722

Josef Havelka (Q27525722): chess player: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I am not famous. I want to delete my personal information. --~2026-11844-06 (talk) 19:15, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

In case the images are also to be deleted: Requests to delete images must be made on Wikimedia Commons. Granpar (talk) 06:17, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

The item was created by a bot, and from User talk:HypoBOT#FIDE-Master it looks like there are items for most or all with FIDE Master (Q1049520). Peter James (talk) 18:31, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Pinging @Wesalius the creator of this item Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 09:27, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Q18496264

Dorotea Vascellari retirement home (Q18496264): former retirement home in Calalzo di Cadore (Italy), closed in 2011: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nella posizione geografica indicata non esiste alcuna casa di riposo o qualsiasi altro elemento riconducibile a quel nome. Non esiste nemmeno un qualsiasi altro elemento degno di essere inserito. Questo elemento risulta essere una raccolta di dati scollegati tra loro e senza senso. Adfc (talk) 20:28, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

There are sitelinks, and it is not in https://www.istat.it/notizia/basi-territoriali-e-variabili-censuarie/ for 2021, but was there in 2011. Some of the identifiers were wrong, so I moved them to a new item Casa di riposo (Schilpario) (Q138457616). Peter James (talk) 18:15, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

https://bur.regione.veneto.it/BurvServices/Pubblica/DettaglioAttoEntiVari.aspx?id=424177 mentions it; it seems to no longer exist, although the buildings are still there. There are a few of these, and human settlement (Q486972) doesn't seem right for the P31, but I don't know if they should be retirement home (Q22908), statistical territorial entity (Q15042037), or both. Peter James (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your link! Reading that page of Veneto Region, I have just found that there was a retirement home there, but it has been closed in 2011 (https://sindacodicalalzo.blogspot.com/2011/02/chiusa-la-casa-di-riposo-da-il.html) and the building is still empty.

I can now correct the item and I think you can cancel the request for deletion. Adfc (talk) 06:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Q121029318

Q121029318: leaf that a root vegetable grows during the first summer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Item not adequately justified. No references. Unclear label and description. Alexander Abair (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

1) WD:N criterion 1. 2) This is a local term which not necessarily has an analogue in English. Wikidata does not restict the creation of items for terms like this. --Wolverène (talk) 12:14, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

P.S. After a little research, I think that Q121029318 may be merged into Q126484886. If "naatti" means leaves of root vegetables (en:wikt:naatti says 'the above ground part of a root vegetable'), it is pretty same to what I would call ru:ботва in my native Russian. But Finnish "naatti" may mean not just leaves but also inflorescences and fruits, so I am not 100% sure.
Unclear label and description. -- I am not the best in formulating, but I would enter the label 'top', the description 'above-ground part of a root vegetable', and the alias 'root vegetable leaves'. --Wolverène (talk) 12:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Q114787390

Minister of Youth (Q114787390): cabinet position in Ivory Coast: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Doublons Blessingedi76 (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138791842

Q138791842: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising not meeting notability criteria --GeorgR (de) (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:40, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, four pages (a small company, the two owners and their cookbook) are linked with each other. All are promotional. GeorgR (de) (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138791802

Q138791802: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising not meeting notability criteria --GeorgR (de) (talk) 21:57, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, four pages (a small company, the two owners and their cookbook) are linked with each other. All are promotional; deletion has been requested for all four. GeorgR (de) (talk) 22:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep 21000000 views [10] Granpar (talk) 09:10, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138791936

Bistro@Home (Q138791936): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising not meeting notability criteria --GeorgR (de) (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, four pages (a small company, the two owners and their cookbook) are linked with each other. All are promotional; deletion has been requested for all four. GeorgR (de) (talk) 22:03, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep added some statements Granpar (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138788714

Sabrina Schettler (Q138788714): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertising not meeting notability criteria --GeorgR (de) (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:00, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes, four pages (a small company, the two owners and their cookbook) are linked with each other. All are promotional; deletion has been requested for all four. GeorgR (de) (talk) 22:02, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep foodblogger with 21.000.000 views [11] Granpar (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Q131369571

George Lyton Rockwell (Q131369571): 1839 - 1910: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable. Not the fault of the creator, this was made as a valid #3 claim to notability as the father of a notable person. However, this was actually a mistake repeated by several geneology sites - Doc Rockwell's father was not this man, but George Scott Rockwell, a different guy (who there is some sourcing abt), as written about in the biography (American Fuehrer (Q133281592)) of Rockwell's much more infamous son. No reliable primary or secondary source says a "George Lyton Rockwell" is Doc Rockwell's father. This is afaik a totally non-notable person. I do not believe this guy has any notable relatives. The identifiers, as far as I know, do not evidence notability. --PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:11, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138793653

Sever Silaghi (Q138793653): Romanian entrepreneur, founder of eBattery.Energy and SEVER Network: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person. Gikü (talk) 22:01, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:23, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

This item refers to a clearly identifiable person and is supported by multiple publicly available references from Romanian media sources. His item refers to a clearly identifiable person (Criterion 2 of WD:N).

Independent editorial coverage exists in:

• 2mnews (10 March 2026): https://2mnews.ro/exclusiv-fiul-unui-fost-ministru-vizeaza-construirea-in-maramures-a-unui-parc-de-stocare-a-energiei-electrice-cu-o-capacitate-de-20-mwh-investitie-estimata-la-valori-cuprinse-intre-3-si-8-milioane/
• Transilvania Business (10 March 2026): https://www.transilvaniabusiness.ro/2026/03/10/energybat-capital-ridica-un-parc-de-stocare-de-10-mw-in-seini/
• Dincolo de Sport (11 March 2026): https://dincolodesport.eu/fiul-unui-fost-ministru-din-satu-mare-construieste-un-parc-de-stocare-a-energiei-de-milioane-de-euro/
• PortalSM (28 November 2015): https://portalsm.ro/2015/11/accident-rutier-in-care-a-fost-implicat-fiul-deputatului-ovidiu-silaghi-patru-tineri-la-spital-foto/
• Sătmăreanul (29 November 2015): https://www.satmareanul.net/2015/11/29/accident-cu-patru-raniti-pe-drumul-spre-viile-satu-mare-fiul-deputatului-ovidiu-silaghi-se-afla-in-masina/
• SatuMareNews (29 November 2015): https://www.satumarenews.ro/index.php/locale/item/1376-accident-rutier-cu-patru-raniti-printre-care-fiul-deputatului-ovidiu-silaghi
• Evenimentul Zilei (29 November 2015): https://evz.ro/accident-grav-cu-fiul-fostului-ministru-ovidiu-silaghi-prima-reactie-a-fostului-membru-din-guvernul-tariceanu.html

Additional public coverage also exists in a News.ro press release:

https://www.news.ro/comunicate/ebattery-network-accelereaza-dezvoltarea-capacitatilor-de-stocare-a-energiei-electrice-in-romania-22243165

These are publicly available sources discussing Sever Silaghi in connection with energy projects in Romania and earlier national/local media coverage. For this reason, the claim that the subject is non-notable is disputed. US234Energy (talk) 13:32, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138808583

Karim Saari (Q138808583): French underwater photographer and environmental activist, founder of Dark Massilia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion; see sulutil:Karim saari and c:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism § Karim saari Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:38, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

This item represents a real person with verifiable media coverage:

ARTE documentary, TF1, La Provence newspaper.

The subject is a recognized environmental activist based in Marseille, France,

founder of the Projet Sentinelle Poséidon cleanup project.

Multiple reliable secondary sources exist. Dark massilia (talk) 09:08, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

The above is a sock of item creator Special:Contributions/Karim saari. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:13, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

This item represents a real person with verifiable media coverage:

ARTE documentary, TF1, La Provence newspaper.

The subject is a recognized environmental activist based in Marseille, France,

founder of the Projet Sentinelle Poséidon cleanup project.

Multiple reliable secondary sources exist. Dark massilia (talk) 09:12, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I am the same person behind both accounts, which are declared as linked

on my Commons user page. I was not aware of the rules regarding multiple

accounts when I created them. Regarding notability: I have verifiable

media coverage from ARTE, TF1, and La Provence newspaper as an

environmental activist and founder of Projet Sentinelle Poséidon.

I am working on creating a proper Wikipedia article to establish notability. Karim saari (talk) 09:29, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I am Yann Fernandez, the subject of this item. I am a French journalist and corporate event host with 30 years of professional experience in television and radio. I have worked with major French organizations including Air France, SNCF, EDF, Orange, Safran, CNES, VINCI, and McDonald's. I have an official website (yannfernandez.com) and a professional LinkedIn profile. I contest the deletion of this item on the grounds that I am a verifiable professional public figure in the French media and corporate events industry. ~2026-19359-95 (talk) 09:39, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

 Comment: the TA above was referring to the nomination for Yann Fernandez (Q138799938): no description. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 11:18, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I am new to Wikimedia projects and still learning the platform's rules and technical guidelines. My apologies for the mistakes regarding multiple accounts; I did not realize this was against the rules.

My contributions are strictly for non-profit, associative purposes. As president of Team Oxygen, my goal is to serve the public interest by providing educational content and photographic documentation of the Marseille coastline's ecological state. This is not self-promotion, but environmental documentation (Project Sentinelle Poséidon) supported by reputable media sources (ARTE, TF1). I appreciate your patience while I get accustomed to the community standards. Karim saari (talk) 12:36, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Q138799938

Yann Fernandez (Q138799938): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:23, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

I am Yann Fernandez, the subject of this item. I am a French journalist and corporate event host with 30 years of professional experience in television and radio. I have worked with major French organizations including Air France, SNCF, EDF, Orange, Safran, CNES, VINCI, and McDonald's. I have an official website (yannfernandez.com) and a professional LinkedIn profile. I contest the deletion of this item on the grounds that I am a verifiable professional public figure in the French media and corporate events industry. ~2026-19359-95 (talk) 09:42, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Q137379948

Peter Oloche David (Q137379948): Nigerian Researcher and Businessman: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam, self-promotion 🏹Nathan Veritas 20:57, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep The item meets Wikidata’s general notability guideline and is supported by verifiable, independent sources.

1. The subject has DOI-registered academic publications, including abstracts published in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics by the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), a recognized international scientific organization.

2. These works are indexed across multiple independent scholarly databases (e.g., ORCID, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Dimensions), establishing a consistent and externally verified research identity.

3. The subject’s work has been cited in academic theses, indicating independent scholarly use beyond self-publication.

4. There is independent coverage from BusinessDay, Europeana and Atmosphere Press, which provides third-party verification of the subject’s real-world role and activities.

5. Since contested and restoration of the item, the item has been substantially improved compared to earlier versions, with structured references,20+ academic identifiers, DOI-linked publications, evidents of mentioned and his work be cited by academic thesis and removal of any promotional language.

The presence of multiple independent sources and a verifiable academic record demonstrates that the item is not promotional but descriptive and compliant with Wikidata policies.

I welcome further improvements, particularly the addition of more independent sources if needed. NatHaddan (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Item has a lcauth- and a dnb-id. Both proberties are Wikidata properties for an identifier that suggests notability Granpar (talk) 10:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Scientific articles aren't especially scholarly and appear to abstracts of undergraduate level work. Creator admits to knowing the subject but claims they are not close or have not interacted in some time. Their account being a single purpose account creating multiple (what I assume are AI written) articles (nominated for deletion) are many Wikipedias undermines those claims. The images uploaded to commons seem to be either less than genuine or AI fabrications. The creator was blocked on enwiki for repeated AI contributions and fabrication. I know this item was deleted once and undeleted, but I am still unconvinced of the subject's notability. William Graham (talk) 01:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

there @William Graham Thank you for your observations. I understand the importance of ensuring that all content meets notability and verifiability standards.

Regarding the subject’s scholarly work, Peter Oloche David has published conference abstracts in AACR journals, including Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, which are indexed with DOI and cited in independent academic thesis https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/85/23_Supplement/B030/768256/Abstract-B030-Decoding-cancer-evolution, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Abstract-A001%3A-Navigating-the-future-of-therapeutic-David/5a3e9e0576de4ad1004bb62c1386306f3e783e4c. These are internationally recognized venues in oncology research, and represent genuine scholarly contributions, not undergraduate work.

The subject’s publications are independently indexed in 20+ academic databases, including WorldCat, OpenAlex, Dimensions, and Semantic Scholar. These sources provide third-party verification of his professional and academic activities.

Regarding concerns about AI or single-purpose account creation: all items were based on verifiable publications and identifiers, and are not AI-generated. The focus has been on documenting the subject’s publications, affiliations, and verifiable media coverage.

We are committed to continuing to improve the article/Wikidata item in full alignment with Wikipedia and Wikidata policies, adding references and independent coverage to ensure the content meets all notability and verifiability standards. NatHaddan (talk) 01:33, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Q61623660

Lac à Léo (Q61623660): lake in Saint-Alphonse-Rodriguez, Quebec, Canada: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Didn't find this lake on Banque de noms de lieux du Québec ID (P2100) or https://www.municipalite.saintalphonserodriguez.qc.ca/citoyens/environnement/lacs-et-milieux-humides Fralambert (talk) 00:07, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Coordinates in the item point to a lake in the OSM map - and one several hundred meters long. I can't find online a topographical map of Quebec, but that lake must be notable and have a name. Therefore,  Keep and correct he name if needed.

I've checked in Wikishootme for duplicates and there isn't any other item with coordinates on the same lake. Pere prlpz (talk) 09:12, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

I would expect a lake to be at least in a local map, like https://www.municipalite.saintalphonserodriguez.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/423-1990-plan.pdf Which is not. This is why I use the municipality site. Fralambert (talk) 02:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Q138660429

Kévin Boutillier (Q138660429): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Non-notable self-promo; per

• Wikidata:Project chat/Archive/2026/01#Question about notability: Semantic web researcher with ORCID, LOV vocabularies, Schema.org contributions
• User talk:Ternera#Question about Q137441557 (Verisav)
• Wikidata:Bistro/Archive/2026/03#Demande de création d’un item Person pour Kévin Boutillier (identifiants d’autorité)
• Wikidata:Project chat#Request to add authority identifiers to Q138660429.

-- Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:36, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

• Bonjour, je ne suis lié ni de près ni de loin à M. Boutillier, et il ne saurait donc s'agir d'autopromotion. Si j'ai créé l'élément, c'est pour faire suite à une demande sur le Bistro francophone.

  Surtout, l'intéressé répond aux critères de notoriété puisqu'il fait l'objet de plusieurs notices d'autorité (qui ne sauraient avoir été produites par lui-même, et sont indépendantes de lui).

  À conserver, donc.

  Maxime 18:39, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  It was the request to which you refer which was self-promotion, and the issue of the identifiers is addressed in the most recent discussion, linked, above. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:27, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  Merci pour cette réponse. Il est question d'identifiants générés par le sujet lui-même. Mais ce n'est pas, et ne saurait être le cas du SUDOC, par exemple (du moins à ma connaissance...). Maxime 21:43, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

  (

  VIGNERON
  Ayack
  Ash Crow
  Tubezlob
  PAC2
  Thierry Caro
  Pymouss
  Alphos
  GAllegre
  Jean-Frédéric
  Manu1400
  Marianne Casamance
  Nattes à chat
  Pierre André
  Bouzinac
  Jsamwrites
  Baidax
  LearnKnowGive1
  Daieuxetdailleurs
  Archives nationales DJI
  Jmax
  LearnKnowGive1
  Koxinga
  Maxime
  Framawiki
  Legonin
  Rémi sim

  Notified participants of WikiProject France, d'ailleurs. Maxime 21:43, 29 March 2026 (UTC))

  The notices in question correspond more to those that any non-notable author could benefit from. As it stands, there are no notices from major institutions or press coverage demonstrating that the person is particularly notable. I do not see any structural need. Best, Baidax ^💬 23:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

   Neutral leaning toward  Delete; most identifiers are self-attributed and/or are easy to get ; but maybe GND ID (P227), Library of Congress authority ID (P244) and IdRef ID (P269) are enough (very unsure). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 08:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

  VIGNERON : en effet, à ma connaissance on ne peut obtenir "tout seul" aucun des identifiants que tu cites. Maxime 09:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Based on the Library of Congress authority ID (P244) and GND ID (P227) external identifiers, both are instance of (P31) Wikidata property for an identifier that suggests notability (Q62589316). https://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n2026510334.html also links to this item Piecesofuk (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

The LoC entry lists these sources:

1. Linked Data and Semantic Vocabularies for Libraries and Cultural Heritage: Aligning Domain Vocabularies with BIBFRAME and Schema.org, 2026:title page (Kévin Boutillier (Verisav)) - http://id.loc.gov/resources/instances/in00024498641
2. Email from the author
3. IdRef (website)
4. Verisav (website)

1 is a self-published paper ("description source: Title from PDF title page (https://www.verisav.fr)"); 2 is evidently self--published; 4 is a self-published website.

Are we saying we are going to consider anyone who sends an email to LoC as notable? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

I agree, as I said it's based on the external identifiers which are "assigned or curated by an independent authority". They are supposed to be one of the ways to determine notability, see the notabilty proposal at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Notability_policy_reform#Round_2:_Policy_proposal if we ignore external identifiers then I'm struggling to find anything to establish notabilty Piecesofuk (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Baidax : ces auteurs sont néanmoins "notables" au sens de WD:N. Ka façon d'apprécier la notoriété sur Wikidata est sans commune mesure avec la notion qu'on en a généralement, car elle est autrement aisée à satisfaire qu'ailleurs (notamment Wikipédia). Maxime 09:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

•  Keep Marianne Casamance (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Q138763312

The Geek and The Detective (Q138763312): American action‑driven podcast hosted by Amy Lynn: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable - no sitelinks (beyond Commons, which contains nothing beyond the logo) or substantial references Omphalographer (talk) 22:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Structural need for Q138542409  Keep Granpar (talk) 05:58, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Q131363032

Thae Su Nyein (Q131363032): Burmese model and beauty pageant contestant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, xwiki spam, sitelinks pending delete. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

If the existing sitelinks are deleted I would agree, but since they exist as of now we should wait. Sjö (talk) 10:45, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Q139042617

Svetlana Gadzhieva (Q139042617): American accountant and author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person Amomum (talk) 01:24, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 03:00, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep This item meets Wikidata notability policy (WD:N): it has multiple external identifiers (Google Scholar ID Wb3UMGAAAAAJ, Semantic Scholar ID 2354836151, ORCID 0009-0007-8848-022X, LinkedIn), is referenced by 5 independent Items as main subject (P921), and represents a real-world verifiable entity with government-issued licenses. Svetlana Gadzhieva holds California CPA license #147344 (verifiable via California DCA) and IRS Enrolled Agent license #00163099. She is recognized in professional accounting circles as an author and expert: she serves on the CalCPA Committee on Taxation and Accounting Principles and Assurance Services Committee, and is a member of Financial Executives International AI Steering Committee. She is a recipient of the 2025 Women Changing the World Award (Silver, Global Impact and Americas Migrant Leadership) and was named Next Generation in Accounting honoree by San Francisco Business Times and CalCPA in 2025. The item is supported by independent publications including San Francisco Business Times, CEOWORLD Magazine, Komsomolskaya Pravda, and Ekspress Gazeta. BorisBoroda (talk) 03:12, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

The identifiers attached does not reflect notability, and the usage is questionable.

• ORCID data does not list any independently indexed works, the record mostly user-generated.
• Google Scholar does not mention any citations, the record dates are recent, and I believe were user generated (user could add their publications manually to Scholar), the only notable records are the bottom most, written in Cyrillic, and I could not check the source page (I tried using VPN, no avail.)
• Semantic Scholar listed interesting result, there are three publications, yet two are in the field totally unrelated to the item subject claims, only one record are related and listed in Scholar. It seem the record are not yet disambiguated.

The usage is questionable since those identifiers are used by researchers and such, and looking at the track record presented in the references, the usage of this identifiers is inconsistent. Furthermore, the fact that the records in these identifiers were mostly user-generated, I have reasons to believe that these records are created solely to force the subject to be notable for Wikidata.

The references cited also do not add any notability. The most strongest one are KP.RU, in which only mentioned the subject as "nominee", the related record on awards are in San Francisco Business Times, where the source labeled as "sponsored content by CalCPA". The rest of the articles cited were from lesser known business publication outlets. The rest references are from sources not establishing notability: self blog, LinkedIn, etc.

Looking at this sources, I doubted the notability, and tend to  Delete the item. Thank you.Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 08:02, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Keep — Thank you for the thorough review. I would like to provide additional context and clarification on the points raised.

Forbes Best-in-State CPA 2026:

The subject has been named to Forbes Best-in-State CPAs 2026, an independently selected recognition by Forbes Media: https://www.forbes.com/profile/svetlana-gadzhieva/?list=best-in-state-cpas — Forbes Best-in-State lists use an independent editorial methodology and no honoree pays for inclusion. This constitutes serious independent coverage under WD:N criterion 2.

San Francisco Business Times — Next Generation in Accounting 2025:

The subject is named directly in this editorial article: https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2025/08/22/meet-the-next-generation-in-accounting-2025-part-3.html — Regarding the "sponsored content" concern: CalCPA is a non-profit professional organization that used a media platform to publicize its honorees. The recognition program itself involves an independent selection process, and no honoree paid for inclusion. The 2026 NorCal Accounting Awards page provides further context: https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/event/172728/2026/2026-norcal-accounting-awards

Women Changing the World Awards 2026 — Silver:

The subject is listed as a verified winner on the official awards website: https://wcwawards.com/winners/ — This is an independent international recognition program, and Silver placement reflects a competitive selection process.

Regarding academic identifiers (ORCID, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar):

These platforms — including ORCID, Google Scholar, and Semantic Scholar — allow researchers to claim and correct their own profiles precisely because automated indexing frequently produces errors, including misattributions and missing works. The two unrelated publications on Semantic Scholar are a result of the platform's automated disambiguation process and do not belong to this subject. This is a well-known limitation of these systems. It is also worth noting that these are identifier properties in Wikidata (P496, P1960, P4012), intended for identity verification rather than establishing notability. The publications listed in the subject's profiles are independently verifiable — searching by their titles returns the original sources directly.

Regarding KP.RU:

The source contains a full independent interview with the subject, which goes beyond a simple nomination mention and constitutes genuine third-party editorial coverage.

Conclusion: Taking into account Forbes Best-in-State CPA 2026, direct editorial coverage in San Francisco Business Times, NorCal Accounting Awards, and Women Changing the World Awards 2026 Silver, the item meets WD:N criterion 2 through multiple independent sources. I respectfully suggest keeping the item. BorisBoroda (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138496906

Remco de Graaf (Q138496906): Dutch digital media entrepreneur and founder of SkyStatus, Zoom.nl and Zoom Academy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears non-notable and self-promotional Jamie7687 (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 6 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:00, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Q109937335

Q109937335: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non ten ningún artigo asociado MAGHOI (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:40, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: M Jack

Does not meet WD:N? Nutshinou (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

Q12524471

Q12524471: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of North Wewewa (Q12524476) FenyMufyd (talk) 08:14, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Have to be merged on mswiki first. Fralambert (talk) 01:24, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Q4636646

3rd Army Aviation Regiment (Q4636646): military unit: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Outdated and now unused (Replaced by Q16687097) --FaboVonDestory (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Updatet. Please read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_Army_Aviation_Brigade_(Ukraine) Quote:

... In December 2003, it became the 3rd Separate Army Aviation Regiment of the Western Ukraine was created on the basis of the brigade. On August 26, 2004, the regiment underwent restructuring and became a Brigade ... Granpar (talk) 11:13, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I wrote that. But Q4636646 is empty and outdated now, so as far as I am concerned it has no more use. FaboVonDestory (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Q4636646 isn't empty Granpar (talk) 05:37, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

I see. As far as I was aware, it is an useless item if it doesn't link articles and was replaced by another entity. FaboVonDestory (talk) 10:32, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep It is not useless. Wikidata serve as a general knowledge base for the world at large. Wikidata:Notability The item meets #2 It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references and #3 It fulfills a structural need, for example: it is needed to make statements made in other items more useful. Granpar (talk) 08:08, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Q7285429

Dhaj the Great (Q7285429): first emperor of the Ror Empire and founder of the Ror dynasty: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

See discussions on Commons and English Wikipedia. There is a sockpuppet network that is very invested in fabricating a nonexistent "Ror dynasty" for caste-supremacist reasons or something. --Phillipedison1891 (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 12:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

@Phillipedison1891 Have to be deleted on guwiki first. Fralambert (talk) 00:53, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Q138745355

Leinhäuser Language Services GmbH (Q138745355): German translation service provider: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:05, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Translator from

https://d-nb.info/1282683209

https://d-nb.info/1247125726

https://d-nb.info/1231566094

https://d-nb.info/1034386255

https://d-nb.info/1073659119

https://d-nb.info/1075020905

Notable translation service Granpar (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Granpar (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

I don't see how these links establish notability. --Dorades (talk) 19:24, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Q2178363

Maximilian Götzen (Q2178363): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Genealogical hoax. The English Wikipedia biography was deleted after an AfD consensus (hoax/non-notable). Claims of headship of the House of Iturbide are false per primary archival records from the Catholic University of America (JSTOR). --Mkeller87 (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 00:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

All linked articles must be deleted first from their respective Wikipedia sites. Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 06:44, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Q139505417

Sterfry (Q139505417): American electronic music and jazz artist, saxophonist, and producer from Nashville, Tennessee: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion) Non-notable from shallow Google search, additionally WD:SELF @Sterfryy --Anywaydun (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Subject has received coverage in FUXWITHIT (EDM press), has been featured on Noisia/Vision Radio, and has multiple documented releases on Bandcamp/Spotify. References are being added directly to the item. Happy to assist with sourcing. Sterfryy (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

I've added a few entries. Could you please add more pages to

described at URL? Pages from independent media outlets are of particular interest. Granpar (talk) 07:15, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Q139541091

Roberta Vommaro (Q139541091): AI Governance & Leadership Advisor, International Tax Lawyer, and Author: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability? Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 16:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

I am contesting this request for deletion. The subject is a woman leader in the leadership advisory and AI space. She is TEDx speaker and a published author ("Magnetic Identity: Presence & Power for the Age of Rapid Reinvention"). The item is well-documented with high-authority references and external identifiers that verify her professional standing and notability in a specialized, high-interest emerging field, where women are still under represented.

P.S. I have also updated the item with further references to secondary media coverage in "Best Health Magazine" and "Voyage LA" to demonstrate established media interest. Liberepress (talk) 17:03, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for adding the references, I will leave this request here for other community to review.Yamato Shiya^{大和 士也} (Talk • Contribs) 17:26, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

Leaning to  Delete. A single self-published book does not clearly establish notability; neither do either of the short interviews linked. Omphalographer (talk) 22:50, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

I am contesting this request for deletion with updated evidence of the subject’s established professional notability as a woman leader in leadership and AI governance. I have updated the item on her occupation as orator supported by a high-authority institutional reference directly from the official TED.com database, which verifies her status as a TEDx speaker. Furthermore, the subject is featured as a notable leader in the published work “Bloom where you’re planted” (link added to the “leadership” field of work), establishing third-party literary recognition. These anchors, combined with an expanded footprint of independent media coverage (additional links to media coverage also added to the leadership field of work) demonstrate that the subject meets Wikidata Notability Point 2 through multiple, serious, and public independent sources. As a woman leader in a specialized technical field, her inclusion is consistent with the community's mission to address the gender gap in documented global leadership. ~2026-26516-00 (talk) 10:21, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Leaning to  Keep because of the TED talk. --Lymantria (talk) 11:30, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

It was a TEDx talk, not TED. TEDx events are much more frequent (on the order of 10-20 conferences every day: [12]), and essentially anyone can give a talk. Omphalographer (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

TEDx talks are highly selective. Only a small fraction of applicants are chosen after a rigorous multi-stage review process focused on the strength and originality of the idea. It is therefore not accurate to say “essentially anyone can give a talk.”

Additionally, while TEDx events are more frequent, not all TEDx talks are selected for the official TED.com platform. The subject’s talk was officially curated and featured by TED on TED.com (links added to the item). This represents a second layer of vetting and notability within the TED ecosystem.

Notability under Wikidata criterion 2 is also clearly met by multiple independent, reliable sources (in addition to TED) already on the item:

• Featured as a woman leader in the published book “Bloom Where You’re Planted”

• Sustained coverage in independent media

• Invited speaker and MBA panelist at the University of Portsmouth (London)

Happy to provide further details or sources if needed. ~2026-26516-00 (talk) 08:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

TEDx talks are highly selective. Reference?

TEDx talk are TED talk held by community that acquire TED license. The community may choose anyone they like, based on their needs, the review might not as rigorous as the TED ones, the indexing indeed because of the acquirement of the license, and TED does not responsible for its content, which is why its "independent".

Professors and professionals are regular invitees to university, a proper "vetting" would see the merit and records of this invitees.

The citation mentioned cannot be verified. Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 09:59, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

While individual TEDx events have some autonomy under TED’s licensing, they must follow official content guidelines, and selection is competitive. This is well-documented by numerous TEDx organizers and past applicants.

It's worth mentioning again that the subject’s talk was not only given at a TEDx event but was officially selected for publication on the official website TED.com (links added to the item), reflecting further vetting by TED. (Not all talks are featured by TED.)

In addition, notability under Wikidata criterion 2 is clearly satisfied by the independent, verifiable sources already on the item:

• Featured as a woman leader in the published book “Bloom Where You’re Planted”

• Sustained coverage in independent media

• Invited speaker and MBA panelist at the University of Portsmouth (London) — a matter of public record.

Happy to add specific organizer references or strengthen any citations if needed. ~2026-26516-00 (talk) 10:20, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

From previous reply and newer reply does not add much.Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 10:24, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Repetition was due to the fact that key factual points continued to be overlooked.

An addition (with source) regarding the subject’s talk being officially selected by TED for publication on the main TED.com website:

TED’s official guidelines state that "TEDx staff review videos from all events" and "The best talks are recommended to a larger editorial review board made up of staff from the TED.com and TEDx teams." (Source: https://help.ted.com/hc/en-us/articles/360038669274)

This additional curation step by TED means not every TEDx talk is featured on TED.com—only a subset is chosen.

If official publication on TED.com, combined with the other independent sources already on the item (featured as a woman leader in the book “Bloom Where You’re Planted”, sustained independent media coverage, and invited MBA panelist at the University of Portsmouth), does not contribute meaningful weight under Wikidata criterion 2, then what standard is being applied?

Specific concerns about the reliability or independence of any source would be helpful to address. ~2026-26516-00 (talk) 11:08, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

I will not address this further, since it will circle around.

My last question. Do you use AI in crafting your response. If you do, please declare how you use AI/LLM in crafting your responses so far. Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 11:27, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

I question the relevance of this inquiry to the core discussion, which is the notability of the subject under Wikidata criterion 2, not my drafting skills.

However, in the interest of moving this discussion to the topic at hand, I am a human, fully capable of crafting my own sentences. To support and substantiate my comments, I conduct extensive research through public records, often utilizing tools such as Google and Grok. Particularly after questions over the selectivity of a TED.com feature were raised, I have conducted research through these widely accepted (and remarkably accurate) tools, fact-checking and outlining the source. I also conducted research on Wikidata's guidelines, and like many, I utilize a spellcheck tool built into my keyboard. But naturally, mistakes can happen (it's only human), so if there are any points that need clarification, please let me know.

This is the type of effort I put into any research I conduct, so it's only natural to expect the same. My previous question however remains unanswered. If an official TED.com feature (where guidelines state that talks are curated by an editorial review board - https://help.ted.com/hc/en-us/articles/360038669274-How-do-I-get-my-team-s-TEDx-talk-featured-on-TED-com-What-is-the-selection-process), sustained independent media coverage, a published book feature as a woman leader, and university MBA speaking do not meet criterion 2, what specific standard is required?

If there are policy-based concerns regarding the reliability or independence of the provided citations, I am ready to address them. Otherwise, I respectfully request that this discussion remain focused on the evidence rather than personal asides. ~2026-26516-00 (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139560701

John Figueiredo (Q139560701): American entrepreneur, founder of SISU Extracts and Plaito: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 06:06, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Keep. Subject meets Wikidata:Notability criterion 2 ("can be described using serious and publicly available references"). Independent third-party coverage:

• BusinessWire — Left Coast Ventures Announces Acquisition of Sisu Extracts (March 2020)
• Cannabis Business Times — coverage of the same acquisition
• MG Magazine — "SISU Extracts: Turning Trim Into Gold"
• Green Market Report — Subversive SPAC Forms The Parent Company with Jay-Z & Roc Nation
• Benzinga — The Parent Company Divests Wholesale Cannabis Extraction Division (2022)
• RWS Magazine — Plaito's AI Education Platform To Reach 1M Downloads

Subject is co-founder of SISU Extracts, which became part of the publicly-traded TPCO Holding Corp via the Subversive Capital SPAC (NEO: GRAMF / OTCMKTS: GRAMF). He is also Lundquist College of Business Forty Under 40 Advisory Board recipient at the w:University of Oregon. The COI is disclosed transparently on my user page per w:WP:COI guidance. I will be adding these references as P854 source statements on the existing claims to address sourcing concerns. Happy to defer to community judgment on whether additional structural improvements are needed before keeping. Jfigueir (talk) 06:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Q7638244

Amrita College of Engineering and Technology (Q7638244): college in Tamil Nadu, India: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Low quality, lack notability, contain only vandalism/spam. The English Wikipedia page of that item is now just a redirect which is also in discussion to deletion. --Shankaranan (talk) 08:00, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

This page is about non-notable college which is also defunct. Good candidate for deletion. Shankaranan (talk) 08:03, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

 Comment I think since this college "once exist", we could let the data here as for archival use. I added former educational institution (Q96086516) to instance of (P31) for now. You could help by adding information about former existence of this college. Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 12:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Q12688215

Irmen (Q12688215): village in the Atyrau region, Kazakhstan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata ID of an article in Malay, article is a mystification, such "village in Kazakhstan" cannot be found on any map or in any source. The closest one is Verkhnaya Irmen (Upper Irmen, on Irmen River) in Novosibirsk Oblast, Russia. --Красный (talk) 13:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Source is possibly https://www.geonames.org/453557/irmen.html, which is based on https://geonames.nga.mil/geon-ags/rest/services/RESEARCH/GIS_OUTPUT/MapServer/0/query?outFields=*&where=ufi+%3D+-3772974 and it's included in a list in kk:Жаңаталап ауылдық округі (Атырау облысы)#Сипаттамасы. Peter James (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Q139622268

Katarzyna Baranowska (Q139622268): Polish journalist, academic lecturer, entrepreneur, author, podcaster and SEO expert: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation of Q138479482, Q138479472. Dorades (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep

Keep. Both Q138479482 and Q138479472 were empty items deleted in February 2026 for lack of content — one had no references, the other was literally empty with a single anonymous contributor. This item (Q139622268) is entirely different: it is a well-sourced entry for a notable Polish SEO specialist with independent references including Wirtualne Media (national press), Majestic Blog (international tool), semKRK Hall of Fame, two published books with ISBN at Helion/Onepress publisher, a record at the National Library of Poland, and an academic affiliation at the University of Wrocław. This is not a recreation of deleted items — it is a new, properly documented entry that meets Wikidata notability criteria. I am the subject of this item. Thank You.  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Katarzyna Baranowska (talk • contribs) at 04:37, 4 May 2026 (UTC).

 Keep VIAF-, NUKAT- and PLWABN-ID Granpar (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

The fact that this item is a second recreation of an item (same subject, just more links), which in its second iteration and this iteration are created by the same author, is already warranting deletion. To restore deleted items, the standard practice is to contact the deleting admin, or through RFU posted in WD:AN, more information.

The fact that this item is created under COI and deviates from community practice.

Now the identifiers: VIAF record contained only 1 related graph (NUKAT), NUKAT only lists 2 publications, which created recently, and after looking at the references (the store links) provided by the subject, could be proven non notable through low readerships. ORCID ID only contains self proclaimed works, and usage of ORCID for a "SEO expert" is already questionable. Polands National Library authority data archive stated that the record was created quite recently, December 2025. The recency of the records altogether with the fact that those records only contain (recent) works with low readership, already lower the notability factor.

References: Lets bring what the owner of the item said. Wirtualne Media (national press) the article were categorized as advertorial news, Majestic Blog (international tool), the article is not published by a known journalistic company, and furthermore, a blog. semKRK Hall of Fame is not indicating any notability, its a list of speakers and CEOs. academic affiliation is not bringing anything academic to the table, the reference given was only a time table for lecture schedule with subject name listed.

I dont have time to check all links provided, but from the pattern (such as usage of company blogs like Majestic or Devagroup, with no notable editorial processes, and more similar to advertising among companies), I could see the "attempted presence", but it fails any notability. The best I could say that the author spamming links to the item CMIIW, some even with no mention of the subject at all.

Sorry for bad English, I bombarded my browser with tabs checking everything, and trying to make this as concise as I could. Please do rechecks my finding, I might missed something.

I think its best to also tag the deleting admin for the first and second iteration of the item creation, cc @EPIC. Thank you.Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 14:35, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

I'm skeptical about the notability here as well. But ultimately I will leave this decision to another admin. EPIC (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Reply to Yamato~kun:

Thank you for your detailed review. I would like to address your points respectfully.

Regarding the recreation concern: I acknowledge that my first attempt to create this item was made hastily, without fully understanding Wikidata's notability policies. I take responsibility for that. This current item (Q139622268) was created after careful study of the guidelines, with proper independent references. I understand the concern, but I ask you to evaluate it on its own merits rather than its history.

Regarding the Wirtualne Media article: This is NOT an advertorial. It is published in the editorial section "Reklama" — a standard department covering personnel news in the Polish advertising industry. The author "bg" is a Wirtualne Media journalist. Advertorials on Wirtualne Media are clearly marked as "materiał sponsorowany" — this article has no such marking.

Regarding VIAF, NUKAT and National Library records being recent: These identifiers exist because my co-authored book SEO dla małych i startujących sklepów internetowych (Helion/Onepress) was published in late November 2025. The recency of the library records directly reflects the recency of the publication — not an attempt to manufacture notability. NUKAT and the National Library of Poland catalogue books based on their own acquisition processes, independently of the author.

Regarding the academic affiliation: The University of Wrocław website and the Institute's page are not updated regularly — this is a known characteristic of Polish academic institution websites. The reference I provided (the lecture schedule PDF) was the best available public document confirming the affiliation at the time of editing.

Regarding Majestic Blog: Majestic is one of the most authoritative SEO tools globally, used by professionals in over 100 countries. Their blog features interviews with recognized industry experts — being invited for an interview is itself an indicator of recognition in the field.

I am not trying to spam this item or manufacture presence. I am the subject of this item and I am trying to represent myself accurately and according to Wikidata standards. I welcome any guidance on how to improve the item further.

---- Katarzyna Baranowska (talk) 15:03, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Still, looking at the links you provided, I doubt the notability. Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 15:07, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you Yamato~kun for your detailed review, it helped me better understand Wikidata's notability standards and improve the item.

I would like to address the closing admin directly with the core argument.

The fundamental idea of Wikidata is to collect verifiable facts confirmed by independent sources. This is exactly what this item provides. The notability here is not based on fame or self-promotion, it is based on 15 years of documented, independently verifiable professional activity:

- National Library of Poland independently catalogued my works

- VIAF and NUKAT independently index my publications

- Helion/Onepress - one of Poland's largest publishers - independently published my book

- Wirtualne Media - national press - independently reported on my career move in 2016

- University of Wrocław independently lists me as a lecturer in their official schedule

- semKRK - Poland's largest SEM conference - independently recognized me in their Hall of Fame and appointed me Head Judge of the SEO category in 2024 and 2026

Each of these facts is independently verifiable. This is precisely what Wikidata exists to document.

I respectfully ask the admin to evaluate this item based on its documented merits.

---- Katarzyna Baranowska (talk) 15:19, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep The old entry should not be used as a criterion of notability. Just because someone didn't know how to add the item properly, so it was deleted, should not be a factor to delete the notable person from Wikidata.

There is more than enough data in the entry to prove the item is notable. There are items (about living persons) that have 1/5 of this information, and no one questions their notability.

VIAF, NUKAT, PLWABN identefiers. She is a co-author of a book ISBN 978-83-289-2262-4 reference: national library.

There is more than enough to consider this entry as notable. We should not penalize someone because she made a mistake while learning. Jcubic (talk) 22:09, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139658860

kamienica przy ulicy Wspólnej 61 (Q139658860): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet Wikidata notability: no label, no description, no references, no identifiers, no sitelinks, and no independent coverage. The item is essentially empty and fails the criteria for inclusion. --Sonal ^(Talk) 06:40, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:16, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139658863

Kamienica Dawida Lewkowicza Pompera (Q139658863): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not meet Wikidata notability: no label, no description, minimal references, no identifiers, no sitelinks, and no independent coverage. Linked to Q139658860, which is also non-notable. Both items are weak imports and fail inclusion criteria. --Sonal ^(Talk) 06:48, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 06:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Q124643684

{{subst:Request for deletion of date of birth

| itemid = Cristina Poncibò (Q124643684)
| reason = sensitive data

}} --~2026-26426-09 (talk) 06:42, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Q132892024

generated by (Q132892024): what software tool was used to generate this value: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a property Yirba (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

cc @Mykhal could you help clarify what the item used for? Yamato~kun (Talk • Contribs) 10:36, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

It was intended for stating what software was used for generation of structural identifiers like SMILES (even for "canonical" ones, not going into more details for now), which can be different for the same compound. Even though the property does not exist yet (which i realized shortly after item creation), i think it might be useful for some other properties which might be created in near future. Maybe there's already some existing similar one, which I was not able to identify. --Mykhal (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

… see current Q139579369 ref comments. --Mykhal (talk) 15:45, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139568390

aniSearch manga ID (Q139568390): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not a property Yirba (talk) 23:58, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139579389

generated from (Q139579389): (type of) input used for this value generation: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not a property Yirba (talk) 00:01, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

see related #Q132892024 above. --Mykhal (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Grassrootech

1. Q139580555 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139665259 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non-notable company and its founder. No references or sitelinks on either. Omphalographer (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139689708

Rove (Q139689708): American luxury short-term rental marketplace.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotional / non-notable company. No independent reliable sources. Item only describes a short-term rental marketplace (Rove Travel) with self-published references. Fails Wikidata notability policy (no significant coverage in independent sources). --Sonal ^(Talk) 03:37, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Nicánima Estudios and related entities

As far as I can tell, this animation studio and its works are fictitious. All twelve (!) films they're credited with have release dates in the future, and none of these entities have substantial independent references. Omphalographer (talk) 04:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139693386

Q139693386: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Doublon par erreur de Q126728338 AvatarFR (talk) 08:55, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q130713506

Q130713506: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Missing notability or relevance for the company --GettractionWikiInfo (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139680744

Steve Stinson Keller Williams Realty Huntsville (Q139680744): Top listing agent and Broker Associate with Keller Williams Realty in Huntsville, Alabama. Licensed since 2005. Top 5% of local MLS. 500+ families served. 250+ verified five-star reviews. BBB A+ Rating. Best of Zillow award recipient.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam UndefinedRachel (talk) 12:07, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q4785714

Archconfraternity of the Order of the Holy Ghost (Q4785714): organization: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs), not notable.
See also deleted article en:Archconfraternity_of_the_Order_of_the_Holy_Ghost

--Kontributor 2K (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138767228

Soundframe (Q138767228): Record label: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:26, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:31, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138618590

Rubén Gallardo Acedo (Q138618590): Film Composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:26, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:31, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep. Item is notable as a film composer with multiple independent identifiers (VIAF, ISNI, IMDb, MusicBrainz, Spotify, Apple Music, Discogs, TMDB, etc.) and reliable references (Crew United, Stage32, SoundtrackFest coverage, official website). Professional affiliations (ASCAP, Soundframe) further establish notability per WD:N. Sonal ^(Talk) 06:12, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep https://www.imdb.com/de/name/nm9421336/awards/?ref_=nmmi_ov_ql_2

added some statements Granpar (talk) 06:19, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Biktima

Does not meet WD:N? Nutshinou (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139565443

Ashit Debdas (Q139565443): Entrepreneur, Co-Founder of Jobrooms: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person and company Geoffroi (talk) 20:58, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete with Jobrooms (Q139564664). Fralambert (talk) 21:22, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138800309

Adarsh Mishra (Q138800309): Indian Entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person Geoffroi (talk) 21:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:06, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete with Adarsh Mishra & Company (Q138800597) Fralambert (talk) 01:03, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

Levent Bulut and related entities

Author and his self-published works. No sitelinks, no evidence of notability. (DOIs on some of these entities are all to self-publishing sites like Zenodo.) Omphalographer (talk) 18:12, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Novvx Proyect

1. Q139714399 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139714378 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:49, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Q136392323

Finland-Mongolia Bilateral Investment Treaty (Q136392323): bilateral investment treaty between Finland and Mongolia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I fail to see notability for this. Shadow. 547

 Keep It's not because this is just a minor trade treaty that this is not valid https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements/treaties/bit/1519/finland---mongolia-bit-2007- --Fralambert (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Granpar (talk) 06:12, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: founder/company/product

1. Q139330002 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139330077 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q139330097 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

appear non-notable and promotional; created by same user Jamie7687 (talk) 01:27, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139740854

K. Ragul Varma (Reddy) (Q139740854): Defence General and U.T Administrator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Xwiki vandal Sun8908 💬 06:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

I would have nominated it, having originally arrived from c:Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism § Arumugam2004; thank you @Sun8908 :) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 06:34, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

 Comment Creator is now globally locked for spam. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:20, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139741526

𘾈 (Q139741526): Jurchen ideograph “ŋgə” (U+18F88): RS29.05, NC:129.03: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item represents a single Jurchen ideograph “ŋgə” (U+18F88). It fails Wikidata’s notability criteria:

• No sitelinks to any Wikimedia project (Wikipedia, Wiktionary, etc.). • No reliable external identifiers or references. • Only contains a Unicode code point description, which is already covered by Wikidata’s structured data for Unicode blocks. • Duplicates existing coverage in Unicode charts and does not meet the threshold for standalone notability.

Per Wikidata:Notability, items must be linked to a Wikimedia project or have significant external identifiers. This entry has neither, and therefore does not merit a separate item.

Proposed action: Delete. --Sonal ^(Talk) 08:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139735907

Q139735907: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate of Q33121057, which is more detailed. --PinTweaks (talk) 10:54, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:04, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138568973

Lyon Gaber (Q138568973): Egyptian-American actor, writer and director: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not fulfill notability criteria. --Notthedot (talk) 14:23, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138391122

Diego Cusano (Q138391122): Italian illustrator, visual artist and television host: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable artist Geoffroi (talk) 17:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138391526

La Rivincita della Pecora Nera (Q138391526): illustrated book by Italian artist Diego Cusano: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Work by Non-notable writer Geoffroi (talk) 17:17, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138391422

Dove Crescono le Favole (Q138391422): illustrated book by Italian artist Diego Cusano: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Work by non-notable writer Geoffroi (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138391610

Food Art and Fantasy (Q138391610): illustrated book by Italian visual artist Diego Cusano: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Work by non-notable writer Geoffroi (talk) 17:20, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138391638

WOW – Diego Cusano (Q138391638): WOW exhibition by Diego Cusano: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promo for Non-notable artist Geoffroi (talk) 17:22, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138391695

Beauty Vibes (Q138391695): television beauty and wellness format: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promo for non-notable tv show Geoffroi (talk) 17:23, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 18:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138780985

Ben Grant (Q138780985): British entrepreneur, author, and managing partner of Lambton Capital Partners: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion of Non-notable person Geoffroi (talk) 18:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138856910

Unsellable: How to Build a Business That Works Without You (Q138856910): 2026 edition of Unsellable by Ben Grant: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Promotion of Non-notable book Geoffroi (talk) 19:00, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q137969796

Berke Deniz Yüksekdağ (Q137969796): Turkish writer, entrepreneur and founder of İyi Yol Akademi: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion Geoffroi (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139755139

Webmivo (Q139755139): Turkish digital marketing agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:09, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139744270

ICODA (Q139744270): crypto and blockchain marketing agency founded in 2017: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:10, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139738616

Structural Marketing (Q139738616): Japanese marketing book by Kazumi Endate: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:12, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q61457528

Mustafa Deniz Yılmaz (Q61457528): Turkish otolaryngologist and vertigo specialist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Page created as advertisement Askeuhd (talk) 20:24, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:31, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep A renowned scientist who seems to have made the mistake of also achieving commercial success. Granpar (talk) 07:17, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Jeff Sterling Hughes

1. Q139701193 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139702496 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q139702456 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q139702533 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139694760

Krein Group (Q139694760): Italian B2B digital marketing and marketing technology agency specialized in industrial and manufacturing companies: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Recreation of Q139525538, Q139671210. Dorades (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding GoGoChimp

Not notable. GoGoChimp (Q139585936) is a recreation of Q139552468; Chris McCarron (Q139585911) is a recreation of Q139553384. Dorades (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Inna Udalaya

1. Q139414643 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139586108 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:36, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Non-notable and items make incorrect use of properties. IntensionalLogican (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q112584782

Bianca Graulau (Q112584782): independent Puerto Rican journalist and storyteller: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Fails WD:N, no projects connected to the item. --NoonIcarus (talk) 21:38, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep Emmy winning journalist, mentioned in [13] and [14], extensive media coverage, ... Granpar (talk) 05:36, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep per Granpar IntensionalLogican (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Getknown

1. Q139749070 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139749163 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:45, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138566666

Cahyanudien Aziz Saputra (Q138566666): Indonesian software developer, author, and music artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion of non-notable person Geoffroi (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 9 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:52, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete and delete their group FlagoDNA (Q138566835) IntensionalLogican (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q138665560

Cameron Batt (Q138665560): British machine learning researcher and entrepreneur: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person Geoffroi (talk) 22:07, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:11, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

What exactly bothers you about Cameron Batt? Granpar (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete and delete his company Skubl (Q138665630) and his self created "notable work", Optimizing Micro-Targeted Ad Delivery Through Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithms and Neural Networks (Q138665576), which he "published" in a fake pay-to-play journal, which he lied about on the object as well. Take one look at the final "published" product, not only is it obviously AI generated, they didn't even bother proof reading it to make sure the LaTeX formulae rendered. IntensionalLogican (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Self-promotion, not notable --Wdwd (talk) 08:19, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

What exactly bothers you about Cameron Batt? Granpar (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Q22009197

Q22009197: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

It is the same entity as Q919647 --Rinai Natsumi (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:50, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Q104831971

forced assimilation of Talysh people in Azerbaijan (Q104831971): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Created by bad-translation LTA; see m:SRG § Global lock for vandal. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 14:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@Whyiseverythingalreadyused I would expect that the item was in RfD in it's 19 wikis, it is not. Fralambert (talk) 12:01, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request

1. Q139764658 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139764740 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q139764379 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

non-notable/clearly promotional. Icodense (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139764379 clear notable https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P214 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P227 https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P13049 Structural need for [15]

Q139764658 Structural need for Q139764379

Q139764740 Structural need for Q139764379

 Keep Granpar (talk) 05:25, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Mario André Brückner (Q139764379) seem notable, but I don't understand how it fulfil a structural need for the two other. Fralambert (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139791910

Isham Cook (Q139791910): American essayist and novelist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self promotion --Empat Tilda (talk) 08:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Gaydar

1. Q139694900 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139781378 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q139781386 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q139781628 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Non-notable mobile app, related corporate entities, and their founder. No sitelinks or references for any of these entities. Omphalographer (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139710614

Aritra Durjoy Das (Q139710614): Bengali author and storyteller: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person, self promotion. Borhan (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

The description was unintentionally written in first-person style and is being neutralized. Unsupported promotional wording and excessive genre claims are being reduced.

The subject has published Bengali writing activity and recognition on Pratilipi. Aritra Durjoy Das (talk) 21:02, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139780176

TroubaTrap (Q139780176): music genre created by Rosalvo & Lens Dupuy, fusion of twoubadou and trap music, originated in Montreal: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion, Solidest (talk) 20:46, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:50, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Carlos Eduardo Ravello Joo

1. Q139714842 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139766862 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q139769137 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q139769165 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q139769200 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:04, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete Links to sources on Wikimedia Commons and websites related to the author (websites of their companies and their personal website), also self-published on Zenodo. --Ovruni (talk) 06:48, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete per Ovruni IntensionalLogican (talk) 05:10, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139796933

Horton Group (Q139796933): American digital marketing agency based in Nashville, Tennessee: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:13, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139792345

Promaxis (Q139792345): Performance marketing agency based in Lausanne, Switzerland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139790956

PT ENlight Creation Indonesia (Q139790956): creative agency and event management company in Indonesia: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139031463

Amir K. Darwish (Q139031463): Multicultural Spiritual Leader & Co-Founder of the MK Community Team A.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Cross-wiki-spam/no indication of notability. Icodense (talk) 22:46, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139396226

KNAP GEMAAKT. (Q139396226): webdesign agency in Buren, Gelderland: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable/promotional. Icodense (talk) 22:48, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request Sceneweb artists

219 items containing only instance of (P31) → human (Q5) and a single external identifier (Sceneweb artist ID (P10298)), without other statements. These appear to be incomplete mass-import test items with no independent usefulness in their current state. Items were created by @Elisabeth Borud Leinslie @Feotanja and @Raniapahn 1Veertje (talk) 08:53, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Similar concerns regarding minimal Sceneweb imports were previously discussed at User talk:Raniapahn and the administrators' noticeboard in March 2024.1Veertje (talk) 09:02, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

 Keep They should be updated not deleted. The first couple I checked were clearly identifiable from the external ID Piecesofuk (talk) 06:56, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

ːI merged Q136457233 to Q130813362, Q124129265 to Q44529412, and Q129065512 (not in the deletion request, but in the query) to Q124340389. Others can be improved; I added identifiers to Q131437477. Peter James (talk) 22:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

The fact that some of these items can be identified or improved does not address the underlying issue. Items should not be mass-created as near-empty external-ID containers with only instance of (P31) and Sceneweb artist ID (P10298), leaving it to other editors to determine whether they are notable, merge duplicates, add basic statements, or make them useful. Similar concerns regarding this Sceneweb import workflow were already raised in 2024, including at User talk:Raniapahn and the administrators' noticeboard. The creators of these items should have done this curation before creating new items, not after a deletion request. 21:14, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139721093

Jonathan Blessing (Q139721093): American business executive, founder of Launch Day Advisors: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability. Seems to have been created by the subject. Yirba (talk) 14:21, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139721025

Launch Day Advisors (Q139721025): buyer-side digital advisory firm specializing in AI, software, and design service-provider selection: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Lacks notability. Item seems to have been created by the founder. Yirba (talk) 14:22, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139801129

Lucas Vandenberg (Q139801129): American entrepreneur and founder of social media marketing agency Fifty & Five: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Created by Fiftyandfive alongside the already-deleted Q139799286 (that item's deletion nomination is in the archives as it was deleted fairly quickly after I commented in favour of its deletion). Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 14:26, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q136391224

Abdullah Babu (Q136391224): Bangladeshi businessperson: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable individual. Cross-wiki spam using multiple accounts. Previously deleted several times. Marbletan (talk) 14:52, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q21188110

American television sitcom (Q21188110): television sitcom series originating from the USA: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not a real TV genre Trade (talk) 15:21, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:31, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139807830

Fidelic (Q139807830): American artificial intelligence company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promo BlueCamille ^chat ! 17:46, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139795667

Elite Matchmaking by Angelika Lancsak® (Q139795667): Elite Matchmaking by Angelika Lancsak® is an international matchmaking service founded by Angelika Lancsak, an Austrian-born matchmaker. The business operates through Matchmaking First Ltd, a company registered in London, United Kingdom.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable/promotional. Icodense (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139806431

Explenity (Q139806431): Swiss AI-powered all-in-one study application for students: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable/promotional. Icodense (talk) 19:20, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

 Delete and Explenity (Q139806444). William Graham (talk) 00:27, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

@William Graham: I merged Q139806444 into Q139806431 for convenience. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139806404

The Charles Group (Q139806404): American luxury creative and digital marketing agency founded in 2011: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:17, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139801836

Buro Staal (Q139801836): Dutch digital agency for technical B2B companies in the manufacturing industry: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:20, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139801651

Tavora EOOD (Q139801651): Bulgarian digital marketing and SEO agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:21, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding RiffinAI

1. Q139800438 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q139800604 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:25, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Delete talk page

There’s a mobile app I use (this one), and if you spot a bug there, you can report it via a form. I just realized that these messages don’t go to the developer, but to the talk page of the relevant Wikidata item (even though the bug isn’t in Wikidata, but in the app). Therefore, please delete the talk pages for these two items, because my comments there are irrelevant:

• Talk:Q112000059
• Talk:Q76749800

Thank you Pallor (talk) 10:00, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139817157

KlickyX (Q139817157): Moroccan digital holding company, parent of the Klicky agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139817078

Klicky (Q139817078): Moroccan digital agency founded in Marrakech in 2016: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139815805

India naming dispute (Q139815805): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Hoax concept, derived from simple Wikipedia, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/India_naming_dispute . All WP links have been redirected or removed. Sabelöga (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q108096758

Q108096758: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Informasi tidak jelas sehingga sulit untuk disunting atau ditambah Salmaqilah (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139589518

Q139589518: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpage (ur:سانچہ:Sticky header/دستاویز). Peter James (talk) 16:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q117074791

Q117074791: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpages. Peter James (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139375956

Q139375956: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpage. Peter James (talk) 16:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q118371947

Template:Update after/doc (Q118371947): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpage. Peter James (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139553655

Q139553655: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpage. Peter James (talk) 16:49, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q20823629

Q20823629: Wikimedia module: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc page for a module. Peter James (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q24660086

Q24660086: Wikimedia template: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpages. Peter James (talk) 17:16, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139382966

Q139382966: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, /doc subpage. Peter James (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139804194

VIDYA SOUDHA PUBLIC SCHOOL (Q139804194): Vidya Soudha Public School is one of the best ICSE schools in Bangalore, where learning is fun, engaging, and focused on every child’s growth, talents, confidence, and overall development for a successful future.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Spam UndefinedRachel (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139256048

Sabina Yusubova (Q139256048): the only Azerbaijani patrol inspector in the Kvemo Kartli Police Department.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by LTA. Sincerely, Qədir (talk) 19:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139819535

Pavan Badempet (Q139819535): Data Engineer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable - no sitelinks or substantial references Omphalographer (talk) 19:50, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139806413

From Da Underground (Q139806413): Independent alternative label: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable - no sitelinks or substantial references Omphalographer (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139800846

A Light in the Struggle (Q139800846): memoir by Chaton Daniels: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable - no sitelinks or substantial references. (Self-published work.) Omphalographer (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q51359138

Minna Carin Elisabet Dahlberg (Q51359138): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Genealogical item, parent, wife, nothing more Sabelöga (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:10, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q11756906

Linbrook (Q11756906): hamlet in Hampshire, England, UK: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This hamlet doesn't appear to exist, as noted on the Polish deletion discussion it doesn't appear on Ordnance Survey maps. The only mention of a hamlet called "Linbrook" on the internet that I can find is from On the Market which probably isn't a reliable source. Lucywood (talk) 22:07, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Lexeme:L1524684

Template:Rfd links

Appears to have been accidentally created Redmin ([[User talk:Redmin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:03, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q61283808

Template:Rfd links

This is not an actual film series. It's just a list encompassing every official film set within the Star Trek universe Trade ([[User talk:Trade|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:06, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Template:On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot ([[User talk:DeltaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:10, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q78444225

Template:Rfd links

This is not an actual video game series. It's just a list encompassing every official video game set within the Star Trek universe Trade ([[User talk:Trade|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:08, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Template:On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot ([[User talk:DeltaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:10, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q72996181

Template:Rfd links

This is not an actual novel series. It's just a list encompassing every official novel set within the Star Trek universe Trade ([[User talk:Trade|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:08, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Template:On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot ([[User talk:DeltaBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:10, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139622143

Template:Rfd links

Empty item. --~2026-29400-00 (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139622144

Template:Rfd links

Empty item. --~2026-29400-00 (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139552021

Template:Rfd links

Empty item. --~2026-29400-00 (talk) 00:19, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139552022

Template:Rfd links

Empty item. --~2026-29400-00 (talk) 00:19, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Q115947594

Template:Rfd links

No data. no link Shkuru Afshar ([[User talk:Shkuru Afshar|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:35, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139618176

Template:Rfd links

Not notable. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 00:40, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Q139631029

Template:Rfd links

LTA Segruntwi ([[User talk:Segruntwi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:24, 17 May 2026 (UTC)