social contract

(redirected from Social contracts)
Also found in: Thesaurus, Medical, Encyclopedia.

social contract

n.
A usually implicit agreement among the members of an organized society or between the governed and the government defining and limiting the rights and duties of each.
American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition. Copyright © 2016 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved.

social contract

or

social compact

n
(Philosophy) (in the theories of Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau, and others) an agreement, entered into by individuals, that results in the formation of the state or of organized society, the prime motive being the desire for protection, which entails the surrender of some or all personal liberties
Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014 © HarperCollins Publishers 1991, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2003, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2011, 2014

so′cial con′tract


n.
the agreement among individuals by which society becomes organized and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare.
[1840–50]
Random House Kernerman Webster's College Dictionary, © 2010 K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc. All rights reserved.
ThesaurusAntonymsRelated WordsSynonymsLegend:
Noun1.social contract - an implicit agreement among people that results in the organization of society; individual surrenders liberty in return for protection
accord, agreement - harmony of people's opinions or actions or characters; "the two parties were in agreement"
Based on WordNet 3.0, Farlex clipart collection. © 2003-2012 Princeton University, Farlex Inc.
References in classic literature ?
the people crossing over in the distance seemed unwilling even to look at the islet where the exiled effigy of the author of the Social Contract sat enthroned above the bowed head of Razumov in the sombre immobility of bronze.
"The SOCIAL CONTRACT founded upon this basis will be a perpetual pact between those who have and those who have not.
How these roots acquired their meanings is not known, but a conventional origin is clearly just as mythical as the social contract by which Hobbes and Rousseau supposed civil government to have been established.
Equipped with these conceptual lenses, Binmore has revisited foundational issues concerning the nature of social contracts, and such constructs as the original position, and the categorical imperative.
Although she touches on a range of political and economic issues in this work, including poverty, ideological warfare, and political cynicism, the overarching goal of Underwood (philosophy, Christopher Newport U.) here is to explore the phenomenon of terrorism as a product of violated or illegitimate social contracts. She summarizes and critiques the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls; explores the relationship of terrorism to social contract theory; and proposes strategies for ameliorating terrorism by fostering governmental legitimacy.
In fact, the historical evolution of Morocco's development since Independence can be summarized in two successive social contracts. The second one was built on the foundations of the first at the same time, the second provides a more or less clear and profound critique of the first one.
The success of Western-style democracy after World War II was based on national social contracts: citizens paid taxes, and the state provided the conditions for steady economic progress, along with secure jobs, a social safety net, and redistributive policies that narrowed the income gap between owners and workers.
Recently, 12 countries were examined in a comparative research project titled "Forging Resilient Social Contracts: Preventing Violent Extremism and Sustaining Peace," aiming to uplift the concept of social contract in advancing policy and practice for preventing violent conflict.
This is why it is crucial to understand how corporates and business interests will serve as a pivot for future social contracts.
He discusses how emotion affects how people form social contracts with public figures and brands; the roles of zealots, disciples, and the congregation in viral movements, and how to identify which a leader is and their effectiveness; and the psychology of illogical leaps made by people to support a cause, brand, or personality.
To begin, I theorize the existence of an international competitive market for social contracts, or bundles of rights.