Abstract
IT is well known that the aphelia of many comets are grouped at distances which are nearly the same as those of the larger planets, and astronomers have sometimes attempted to use this fact to demonstrate the existence of a planet beyond Neptune. M. Flammarion mentions two cases—a comet which appeared in 1532 and 1661, and Turtle's 1862 comet, which is related to the Perseid meteors, and has a period of 1211/2 years. These are taken as indications of a planet at a mean distance of about 48 astronomical units. The evidence is obviously insufficient; and special interest therefore attaches to the statement that the Kiess comet (1911b) is possibly the same as 1790 I. If the identity can be established, this comet must belong to the same group as the other two, and may be regarded as strengthening their evidence as to the hypothetical planet.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LING, P. The Possible-Identity of the Kiess Comet. Nature 87, 516 (1911). https://doi.org/10.1038/087516d0
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/087516d0


