from, and appropriates, Hegel's notable writings on
dialectics to
We will explore what attitude powerful currents of idealistic thoughts of the 20th and 21st centuries had towards Hegelian and existential
dialectics. We will attempt to analyze the arguments of representatives of philosophy of ecological crisis from the perspective of Hegelian
dialectics and existentialism regarding the content of Hegelian and existential
dialectics.
In Decolonizing
Dialectics, political theorist George Ciccariello-Maher sets out to decolonize "the"
dialectic in order to position
dialectics as a framework for fighting oppressive contexts and structures.
Hegelian
dialectics is an extension of this in the sense that it is based on Being, not on Non-Being.
This volume presents a translated text of one of Ilyenkov's originally unpublished works,
Dialectics of the Ideal, written in 1974, but first published in Russian in 2009, accompanied by essays examining the contexts and influences on Ilyenkov's thought and commentary on the ideas espoused in
Dialectics of the Ideal.
Adorno claims that in the dialectical movement of the totality something always stays behind and in turn that fault implies the primal and axiomatic crack in the very origins of
dialectics. In this instant of incoherence hope and truth may reside as it releases self-consciousness in constituting itself, thus arising in freedom from the totality.
We have seen that the word '
dialectics' has many [often contradictory] meanings.
In this article, I argue that crucial to understanding Adorno's Aesthetic Theory (1997) is the philosophy he outlines in Negative
Dialectics (1973).
Rejecting those crude and simplistic dismissals of Hegel that often attach themselves to the name 'anti-Hegelianism', Jacques Derrida, in his essay 'From Restricted to General Economy: A Hegelianism without Reserve', decides instead to tarry with the gravitas of Hegelian
dialectics, resolving to 'spen[d] the night with reason' (1) in order to ultimately displace it.
Fabio Vighi, On Zizek's
Dialectics: Surplus, Subtraction, Sublimation, London, Continuum, 2010; 189 pp; 65.00 [pounds sterling]
THE MONSTROSITY OF CHRIST: PARADOX OR
DIALECTICS? By Slavoj Zizek and John Milbank.
This article illustrates the importance of negativity within the dialectical method, aiming to bring clarity to what has been rendered unnecessarily mystical within recent revisions of
dialectics, particular in the conception of "meta-dialectics." The negative element in
dialectics, where in the movement of sublation the subject remains undetermined and nonidentical, is argued to be the productive moment in the dialectical movement that leads to open-ended and ongoing processes of change.
Double
Dialectics: Between Universalism and Relativism in Enlightenment and Post- modern Thought.