Great Lighthouse scores, but users still complain your site is slow? You're not alone.
Here's a shocking reality check: Google's research found that 50% of websites with perfect Lighthouse scores still fail Core Web Vitals when measured with real user data. Half!
That means half the developers celebrating perfect synthetic scores are actually delivering poor performance to their real users.
The Problem with Synthetic Testing
Lighthouse and PageSpeed Insights run in perfect, controlled environments. They simulate an "85th percentile user" — but their simulation is usually wrong for your specific audience.
Real-world variables synthetic tests miss:
- Network packet loss and latency spikes
- Device thermal throttling during extended use
- Background apps competing for resources
- Browser extensions affecting performance
- User behavior patterns (scrolling, multitasking)
- Third-party vendor outages
Your developer-focused B2B app has completely different users than a consumer social platform, but Lighthouse treats them the same.
What Real User Monitoring Actually Shows You
Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects performance data from actual user sessions as they happen. Instead of guessing what your users experience, RUM shows you the reality.
RUM catches problems synthetic testing misses:
🔍 Dynamic content issues - Your personalization engine might be fast for new users but slow for power users with complex data
📱 Device-specific problems - That Android phone model struggling with your animations
💰 Business-critical scenarios - Your checkout flow performing poorly during Black Friday traffic spikes
🌍 Geographic variations - Users in different regions experiencing network infrastructure problems
The Complete Strategy
Don't abandon synthetic testing — use both tools strategically:
- Development: Use Lighthouse to catch obvious issues before shipping
- Production: Use RUM to see what actually needs fixing for real users
- Investigation: When RUM spots problems, use synthetic testing to understand why
- Validation: Confirm your fixes actually help real users with RUM
Why This Matters for Your Career
Understanding real user performance isn't just about better metrics — it's about:
- Fixing problems that actually cost revenue
- Prioritizing work based on real user impact
- Making data-driven performance decisions
- Building faster experiences users actually notice
Getting Started
The fastest way to see the gap between your synthetic scores and real user experience? Install Real User Monitoring and prepare to be surprised by what you discover.
Most developers find performance issues they never knew existed within their first week of real user monitoring.
Want the full deep-dive? I wrote a comprehensive guide covering everything from RUM implementation to business impact analysis: Why You Need Real User Monitoring to Really Understand Your Web Performance
What's been your experience with synthetic vs. real user performance? Have you found gaps between your Lighthouse scores and actual user complaints? Share your stories in the comments! 👇
Top comments (2)
For those asking about implementation: The biggest mistake I see is trying to track everything on day one. Start with Core Web Vitals + your main conversion funnel, then expand from there.
Quick question for the community: What's the biggest performance surprise you've discovered when you started looking at real user data vs synthetic scores? I'm curious if others have seen the same patterns we discuss in web performance consulting.
right
Some comments may only be visible to logged-in visitors. Sign in to view all comments.