Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Konak in Gornja Crnuca: The Court of Prince Milos Obrenovic

2018, FACTA UNIVERSITATIS: Series: Visual Arts and Music

https://doi.org/10.22190/FUVAM1801025B

Abstract

The process of founding and shaping a capital proved to be one of the key issues within the representative culture in any era. This was of particular importance when it came to the 19 th century societies in the Balkans due to the emergence of national consciousness and the creation of nation-states on what had been Ottoman territory for quite a long time. Despite the lack of independence and extreme political circumstances, the Serbian community was aware of contemporary European phenomena in creating and disseminating the ruler's image as an important part of enhancing the sense of national identity. The heart of Serbia under the reign of Milos Obrenovic was a princely court in Gornja Crnuca that, in spite of its structural simplicity, was an unmistakable expression of the highest state authorities.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Milos Obrenovic established Gornja Crnuca as Serbia's capital from 1814 to 1818 to assert national leadership.
  2. The konak's simple structure reflected Milos' desire to connect with the common people's identity.
  3. Princess Ljubica played a significant role in public affairs, often acting in Milos' absence.
  4. The court facilitated the Second Serbian Uprising, initiating critical political and financial reforms in 1815.
  5. Milos' leadership style combined Ottoman practices with a focus on Serbian national identity amidst European influences.

References (17)

  1. Borić, T. (2014). Dvorovi dinastija Obrenović i Karađorđević u Srbiji, Doctoral dissertation. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet.
  2. Borozan, I. (2006). Reprezentativna kultura i politička propaganda: spomenik knezu Milošu u Negotinu. Beograd: Filozofski fakultet, Katedra za istoriju umetnosti novog veka.
  3. Deroko, A. (1940). Narodno neimarstvo II. Beograd: Institut za narodnu umetnost Beogradskog univerziteta. Gavrilovć, M. (1909). Knez Miloš Obrenović II. Beograd: Zadužbina I. M. Kolarca Kadijević, A. (2006). Arhitektura -okvir privatnog života u srpskim zemljama od početka 19. veka do Prvog svetskog rata, In: Stolić, A., Makuljević, N. (eds) Privatni život kod Srba u XIX veku. Beograd: Clio, 245- 258.
  4. Kanic, F. (1986). Srbija zemlja i stanovništvo: od rimskog doba do kraja XIX veka. Beograd: Srpska književna zadruga.
  5. Kojić, B (1958). Seoska arhitektura i rurizam: teorija i elementi. Beograd, Novi Sad: Građevinska knjiga, Zmaj Kuljić, T. (2009). Oblici lične vlasti: sociološko istorijska studija o ideologiji i organizaciji uticajnih evropskih oblika lične vlasti od antike do savremenog doba. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  6. Kunibert, B. S. (1901). Srpski ustanak i prva vladavina Miloša Obrenovića (1804-1850). Beograd: Zadužbina I. M. Kolarca
  7. Ljušić, R. (1986). Kneževina Srbija 1830-1839. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
  8. Marković, R. (1938). Pitanje prestonice u Srbiji kneza Miloša. Beograd: Zadužbina Luke Ćelovića-Trebinjca.
  9. Milićević, M. Đ. (1876). Kneževina Srbija. Beograd: Državna štamparija.
  10. Milićević, M. Đ. (1888). Pomenik znamenitih ljudi u srbskoga naroda novijega doba. Beograd: Srpska kraljevska štamparija.
  11. Milićević, M. Đ. (1896). Kneževina Srbija. Beograd: Državna štamparija.
  12. Milošević, G. (2006). Stanovanje u gradu i na selu, In: Fotić, A. (ed.) Privatni život u srpskim zemljama u osvit modernog doba. Beograd: Clio, 142-172.
  13. Stolić, A. (2006). Rodni odnosi u "carstvu podeljenih sfera", In: Stolić, A., Makuljević, N. (eds) Privatni život kod Srba u XIX veku. Beograd: Clio, 89-111.
  14. Timotijević, M. (2006). Privatni prostori i mesta privatnosti, In: Stolić, A., Makuljević, N. (eds) Privatni život kod Srba u XIX veku,Beograd: Clio, 165-244.
  15. Timotijević, M. (2012). Takovski ustanak -srpske Cveti: o javnom zajedničkom sećanju i zaboravljanju u simboličnoj politici zvanične reprezentativne kulture. Beograd: Istorijski muzej Srbije i Filozofski fakultet.
  16. Vujović, B. (1986). Umetnost obnovljene Srbije: 1791-1848. Beograd: Prosveta, Republički zavod za zaštitu spomenika kulture.
  17. Vuletić, A. (2006). Vlast muškarca, pokornost žena -između ideologije i prakse, In: Stolić, A., Makuljević, N. (eds) Privatni život kod Srba u XIX veku. Beograd: Clio, 112-132.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What explains the significance of Gornja Crnuca in Serbian political history?add

Gornja Crnuca served as Serbia's capital from 1814 to 1818, central to Milos Obrenovic's consolidation of power during crucial uprisings against Ottoman authority.

How did Milos Obrenovic's court reflect Ottoman influences?add

Milos modeled his court after Ottoman practices, which integrated diplomatic norms, enhancing his authority and identity as a national ruler during turbulent times.

What architectural features characterized the konak in Gornja Crnuca?add

The konak featured a rustic log cabin design with a steep roof, a central fireplace, and traditional structures indicating wealth and local culture.

Why was Princess Ljubica's role pivotal at the court in Gornja Crnuca?add

Princess Ljubica managed court affairs in Milos's absence, showcasing her influence and contributing to state operations, breaking conventional gender roles of the era.

When did Milos Obrenovic proclaim himself as supreme prince of Serbia?add

On December 19, 1815, at Gornja Crnuca, Milos was designated 'supreme prince of the Serbian people' during a rebellion assembly, vital for national legitimacy.

About the author
University of Niš, Faculty Member

Tijana Antonijević PhD (1979) graduated in Art History at the Faculty of Philosophy in Belgrade where, in 2003, she defended the thesis Architecture-urban development of Terazije, under the mentorship of prof. Aleksandar Kadijević at the Department of History of Architecture. In the very first years of her studies, she focused her interest on the period of recent Serbian architecture and the arts. She has published several papers and books in the field of research and participated in national and international scientific forums. Se has received several scholarships during her undergraduate studies, scholarships for the most talented students of the Norwegian government and scholarships for the best students of the Universities in Serbia, the Foundation for Culture and Education of HRH Crown Prince Alexander II Karadjordjević. At postgraduate studies, she has been the scholarship owner of the Fund for young talents of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of the Republic of Serbia. In 2008, she enrolled at Doctoral Studies in History of Art at the Department of History of Architecture under the mentorship of prof. dr Aleksandar Kadijević, which she ended in 2014 successfully defending the thesis The Courts of Obrenović and Karadjordjević Dynasties in Serbia. She worked as the art manager and the head of the art department at the Royal Palace Complex, at Dedinje, obtaining the title of a curator. She has organised many exhibitions and collaborated on projects of conservation, restoration and presentation of artworks from the Royal Art Collection under the supervision of the National Museum, as well as on the project of cataloging the art collection. Since 2014, she has worked as professor of History of Art at undergraduate and master studies at the Faculty of Arts, University of Niš.

Papers
31
Followers
208
View all papers from Tijana Antonijevićarrow_forward