The Return of Negation: The Doppelgänger in Freud’s “The ‘Uncanny’”
Abstract
exemplify the originary narratives of the motif and theme of the Doppelgänger. 1 Doppelgänger characters tend to be associated with evil and the demonic; thus one can infer that the Doppelgänger presents a notion of the subject/subjectivity that is defective, disjunct, split, threatening, spectral. With the rise of psychoanalysis, such epithets are taken to indicate a tendency toward a sense of failure or loss in the self. Thereafter, the Doppelgänger has been commonly viewed as an aberration, the stencil of a symptomatology of the self. In what follows I will challenge such a Doppelgänger as the construct of a content-based understanding of fictional motifs and themes, couched in psychoanalytic terminology. To this end, I will re-evaluate the history of the relation between the Doppelgänger and psychoanalysis.
Key takeaways
AI
AI
- The Doppelgänger symbolizes a defective subjectivity, representing split and threatening aspects of the self.
- Freud's concept of negation reveals the unconscious lacks a 'No', forming the basis for understanding subjectivity.
- Jean Paul introduced the Doppelgänger to challenge absolutism in self-conception, advocating for relational subjectivity.
- The paper critiques the tendency to view the Doppelgänger as merely a representation of loss in identity.
- The connection between the Doppelgänger and modernity emphasizes interruption rather than a stable origin in subjectivity.
References (15)
- Freud is too reliant on his protégé Otto Rank's extrapolation of the uncanny in terms of narcissism, first published in Imago in 1917, a couple of years prior to Freud's "Das Unheimliche." See Rank, The Double: A Psychoanalytic Study, trans. Harry Tucker Jr. (New York: Meridian, 1979). See Webber, The Doppelgänger, pp. 38-55 for a discus- sion of Rank and Freud.
- This is of course a move away from the Kantian philosophy and its epistemological concerns. As Freud puts it, in contradistinction to Ernst Jentsch's approach, the un- canny is not concerned with intellectual uncertainty. See Jentsch, "On the Psychol- ogy of the Uncanny", trans. Roy Sellars, Angelaki 2.1 (1995), pp. 7-15.
- My translation. The German reads: "In der Tat hat die Phantasiebearbeitung des Dichters die Elemente des Stoffes nicht so wild herumgewirbelt, daß man ihre ursprüngliche Anordnung nicht wiederherstellen könnte" ("Das Unheimliche," p. 244). The English translation is perhaps closer to Freud's intentions, but, as will soon become clear, this is precisely the reason it is inadequate. The Strachey translation reads: "In fact, Hoffmann's imagi- native treatment of his material has not made such wild confusion of its elements that we cannot reconstruct their original arrangement." All references in this and the following paragraph are to the footnote in Freud, "The 'Uncanny'," p. 353-354; Freud, "Das Unheimliche," pp. 244-245.
- Although there is a growing secondary literature on the chiasmus, the most succinct account remains Rodolphe Gasché's "Reading Chiasms," in Of Minimal Things: Stud- ies on the Notion of Relation (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1999). See esp. pp. 277 ff. where Gasché demonstrates that the chiasmus is used to indicated the essential unifinishedness of texts. Works Cited
- Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre. Sämmtliche Werke. [1845]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1965, Vol. 1.
- Freud, Sigmund. Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria ("Dora") [1905], trans. Alix and James Strachey, Penguin Freud Library, Vol. 8. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991.
- --. "Negation" [1925], Penguin Freud Library. Vol. 11. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991, 437-442.
- --. "The 'Uncanny,'" Penguin Freud Library, Vol. 14. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1991, 339-376. ["Das Unheimliche," Gesammelte Werke, Vol 12. London: Imago, 1947, 229- 268.
- Hertz, Neil. "Freud and the Sandman," in End of The Line: Essays in Psychoanalysis and the Sublime. New York: Columbia UP, 1985.
- Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich. "Jacobi to Fichte," in The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill, trans. George di Giovanni. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen's UP, 1994, 497-536.
- Novalis [Georg Friedrich Phillipp von Hardensberg]. Fichte Studies, trans. Jane Kneller. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003.
- Paul, Jean., Blumen-, Frucht-und Dornenstücke, oder Ehestand, Tod und Hochzeit des Armenadvokaten F. St. Siebenkäs [1796], in Sämtliche Werke, ed. Norbert Miller. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2000.
- --. Clavis Fichtiana seu Leibgeberiana. In Sämtliche Werke, ed. Norbert Miller. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2000 (1.3: 1011-1056).
- Webber, Andrew J. The Doppelgänger: Double Visions in German Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996.
- Weber, Samuel. "The Sideshow, or: Remarks on a Canny Moment." MLN 88.6 (1973, 1102-1133).
FAQs
AI
What is the historical significance of the term Doppelgänger?
The term Doppelgänger was coined by Jean Paul in his 1796 novel Siebenkäs, highlighting its roots in German Romanticism and Gothic literature. Authors like E.T.A. Hoffmann and Edgar Allan Poe further popularized this motif, linking it to themes of identity and subjectivity.
How does the Doppelgänger relate to psychoanalytic theory?
The paper posits that the Doppelgänger reflects a fractured sense of self, indicative of repression and subjectivity's complex dynamics. Freud's conception ties to the 'return of the repressed,' with negation playing a pivotal role in understanding this relationship.
What role does negation play in Freud's understanding of the Doppelgänger?
Freud claims that negation underpins the ego's topology, illustrating that the unconscious lacks a 'No,' thus facilitating the return of repressed aspects of the self. This notion reframes negation as a vital component of subjectivity rather than simply a space of exclusion.
How do Jean Paul and Freud's notions of subjectivity align?
Both thinkers reject absolutist conceptions of self; Jean Paul emphasizes relationality while Freud demonstrates excessive self-awareness. Their works collectively suggest a chiasmic structure of identity, amalgamating excess with subjective differentiation.
What implications does the chiasmic relationship have on identity constructs?
The chiasmic construct disrupts static identity notions and signifies relationality's role in defining subjectivity. This model positions identity as fluid, resisting definitive interpretations tied to singular origins or absolute truths.
Dimitris Vardoulakis