Talk:Venice
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Venice article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_crowned.svg)
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 25, 2011. |
 | This article is substantially duplicated in one or more external publications. Since these publication(s) copied Wikipedia, rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
| This article is substantially duplicated in one or more external publications. Since these publication(s) copied Wikipedia, rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Update on the MOSE anti-flooding project (in use)
editA Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:50, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Inconsistent text: 126 or 118 islands?
editThanks. Apokrif (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
number of islands in venice
editI noticed that the article mentions two different numbers for the islands of Venice (126 and 118). Could someone verify which number is correct and update the text so it is consistent throughout the article? A reliable source should be used to confirm the correct figure. Thank you. ~2026-16228-52 (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
edit
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://archive.schillerinstitute.com/fid_91-96/952_venice.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MolecularPilot Talk 03:23, 23 April 2026 (UTC)