Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Boghog/Archive 10) (bot
Editor of the Week: new section
Line 62:
* A rationale for the use of the vauthors parameter may be found [[Template:Vcite2_journal#Optional_vauthors_parameter|here]] and [[Template:Vcite2_journal#Rationale|here]]. In short, {{para|vauthors}} does everything that {{para|first1}}, {{para|last1}} does including producing clean metadata and providing full compatibility with {{para|display-authors}} and {{para|author-link}}. In addition, vauthors does one thing that {{para|first1}}, {{para|last1}} does not, and that is to provide error checking to ensure that the author names are consistently formatted. Vauthors does all of this without the unnecessary parameter overhead that {{para|first1}}, {{para|last1}} introduces. [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog#top|talk]]) 08:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
* One last point. {{para|vauthors}} may be used in any [[WP:CS1]] style template (cite journal, cite book, etc.) and currently is in use in over [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=insource%3Avauthors&title=Special:Search&go=Go&searchToken=d22mddfxtatb05it3c3kefprf 39,000] articles. Hence the use of vauthors has effectively become a standard along side first1, last1 (for comparison, last1 is used in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&profile=default&fulltext=Search&search=insource%3Alast1&searchToken=dtq18k86jl5gqxe0ffhftxyvo 326,000] articles). [[User:Boghog|Boghog]] ([[User talk:Boghog#top|talk]]) 09:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 
== Editor of the Week ==
 
{| style="border: 2px solid lightgray; background-color: #fafafa" color:#aaa"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[File:Editor of the week barnstar.svg|100px]]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] for work on science related articles. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span>
|}
[[User:Worm That Turned]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]:
:I nominate Boghog to be Editor of the Week for his excellent work on science related articles. We need more people who are willing to help out in topics such as medicine and science, with the knowledge levels that will allow decent quality articles. It's something I know I can't do, so to see someone so prolific doing such good work is fantastic. This editor is a no-nonsense kind and knows/helps wikiproject Medicine so much.' He justly deserves this award.
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
<pre>{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}</pre>
Thanks again for your efforts! '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]]&nbsp;'''·'''&#32; [[User talk:L235#top|t]]&nbsp;'''·'''&#32; [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 21:15, 2 July 2016 (UTC)