-
Updated
Jul 20, 2022 - Python
databricks
Here are 355 public repositories matching this topic...
Describe the bug
When the finalizer is called for CLR JvmObjectId objects, it calls the rm DotnetBackend method and this calls goes through the JvmBridge class. Because the rm call goes through [JvmBridge.CallJavaMethod](https://github.com/do
Description
PyArrow Filesystems don't expect paths to be provided as URIs with a scheme prefix (e.g. s3://). The only reason that DeltaTable.to_pyarrow_dataset() works (if you don't pass a filesystem) is that our DeltaStorageHandler accepts URIs.
We need to change so that:
DeltaStorageHandlerrejects scheme prefixes- We always pass file paths to PyArrow functions *withou
-
Updated
Jul 21, 2022 - Shell
-
Updated
Dec 15, 2021
Follow-up work for #1460
- expose name-to-id mapping for warehouses & clusters
Example syntax could be as below
data "databricks_sql_warehouses" "all_shared" {
warehouse_name_contains = "shared"
}
output "warehouses_mapping" {
value = data.databricks_sql_warehouses.all_shared.mappings <- this returns { "shared" = "11", "shared_1" = [12, 13]}
}- add lookup of cluster
-
Updated
Jul 12, 2022 - Scala
-
Updated
Jan 25, 2022 - Scala
-
Updated
Jan 4, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 21, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Apr 4, 2022 - HTML
-
Updated
Apr 29, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 12, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 21, 2022 - PowerShell
-
Updated
Jul 20, 2022 - Scala
-
Updated
Jun 28, 2022 - HTML
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Dec 8, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 16, 2018 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2022 - HTML
-
Updated
Feb 13, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Jun 17, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 15, 2022 - Python
-
Updated
Nov 11, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Sep 27, 2021 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Feb 20, 2022 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the databricks topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the databricks topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."


I have a simple regression task (using a LightGBMRegressor) where I want to penalize negative predictions more than positive ones. Is there a way to achieve this with the default regression LightGBM objectives (see https://lightgbm.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Parameters.html)? If not, is it somehow possible to define (many example for default LightGBM model) and pass a custom regression objective?