Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Although the results look nice and ideal in all TensorFlow plots and are consistent across all frameworks, there is a small difference (more of a consistency issue). The result training loss/accuracy plots look like they are sampling on a lesser number of points. It looks more straight and smooth and less wiggly as compared to PyTorch or MXNet.
It can be clearly seen in chapter 6(CNN Lenet), 7(Modern CNN), 11 (Optimization LR Scheduler) plots. It is due to how the class
TrainCallbackis implemented on epoch instead of on batch here.This consistency issue plagues many of the TensorFlow plots across the book. PRs are welcome, this sounds like a good issue for beginners who would like to contribute to d2l. Feel free to ask any questions/doubts.
cc @astonzhang @terrytangyuan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: