jsx
Here are 4,512 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Jun 15, 2022 - Go
-
Updated
Jun 15, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 14, 2022 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 15, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2022 - JavaScript
For the most part this just works, but functions within tagged markup get weird indent assertions, e.g.,
${collection.map((item) => {
const { prop1, prop2 } = workWith(item); // eslint: expected indentation of 4 but found 10 (indent)
return html` // eslint: expected indentation of 4 but found 10 (indent)
<${Widget} prop1=${prop1} prop2=${prop2} />
Babel Macro
-
Updated
Apr 26, 2022 - JavaScript
I'm sorry to post an issue that is missing crucial evidence, but some debugging of a recent config loading bug makes me suspect that the react-rails railtie.rb may be modifying the load order of initializers, and preventing the values in Rails.application.config being as expected.
Whether this happens or not appears to be partly dependent on where in the Gemfile the react-rails gem is l
-
Updated
Mar 29, 2021 - JavaScript
As per my comment in BuilderIO/mitosis#444 (comment), this is generating confusion.
Things to do:
- rename the
.lite.tsxoutputted file's extension tooriginal.lite.tsx, because it's actually theoriginal file and is not transformed or generated in any wayoriginal generated file, and has not undergone additionalmitosis buildspecific transp
-
Updated
Jun 9, 2022 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 2, 2022 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jun 12, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 9, 2022 - JavaScript
Non-bubbling events
We should be able to use dispatchEvent to define callback prop based onevent APIs, so we don’t have to deal with capturing/bubbling for specific events.
function MyComponent({id}) {
const onclick = () => {
this.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent("customclick", {detail: {id}}));
};
return (
/* children */
);
}// Usage
<MyComponent oncustomclick={(e-
Updated
Aug 9, 2019 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Apr 29, 2022 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Nov 6, 2019 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jun 15, 2022 - Emacs Lisp
-
Updated
Feb 11, 2022 - JavaScript
Blocked By: wix/vscode-glean#97
Example:
class Foo extends Component {
render() {
return (<div>
{this.props.foo.map((bar) => <div>{bar.x}</div>)}
</div>)
}
}
Current:
const Foo = props => {
const foo = useRef();
const x = useRef();
return <div>
{foo.current.map(bar => <div>{x.current}</div>)}
-
Updated
Apr 28, 2022 - JavaScript
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the jsx topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the jsx topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."


This is about:
Component communication might deserve a dedicated page.
Ancestor -> Descendant
straightforward: passing props. Using a context if the descendants can be too deep down the tree.
Descedant -> Ancestor