The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20220416200859/https://github.com/topics/parallel
Skip to content
#

parallel

Here are 1,576 public repositories matching this topic...

gjoliver
gjoliver commented Apr 13, 2022

Description

There are multiple user requests of using GraphNN data (node and edge lists) as sample batches into a custom RLlib model.

https://discuss.ray.io/t/rllib-variable-length-observation-spaces-without-padding/726
https://discuss.ray.io/t/working-with-graph-neural-networks-varying-state-space/5730/2

The recommended method today is to use Repeated observation space and VariableVal

good first issue enhancement P2 rllib-models
LightGBM
jameslamb
jameslamb commented Jan 27, 2021

Summary

mypy shows some issues in LightGBM's Python package.

mypy \
    --exclude='python-package/compile/|python-package/build' \
    --ignore-missing-imports \
    python-package/
18 errors in 4 files (click me)
python-package/lightgbm/compat.py:12: error: Name 'Series' already defined (possibly by an import)
python-package
numba
rhjmoore
rhjmoore commented Sep 1, 2021

I see comments suggesting adding this to understand how loops are being handled by numba, and in the their own FAQ (https://numba.pydata.org/numba-doc/latest/user/faq.html)

from llvmlite import binding as llvm
llvm.set_option('','--debug-only=loop-vectorize')

You would then create your njit function and run it, and I believe the idea is that it prints debug information about whether

good first issue bug - documentation incorrect
not522
not522 commented Apr 11, 2022

Motivation

optuna.testing.integration.create_running_trial creates an invalid trial which is RUNNING but has a value.

https://github.com/optuna/optuna/blob/9c3d6685f0814bcbd66d7aaa22d50789d969f8e7/optuna/testing/integration.py#L14-L19

Description

We can use study.ask to create a trial. create_running_trial is no longer needed.

Alternatives (optional)

No response

test contribution-welcome good first issue
mikegray
mikegray commented Jun 13, 2019

Version of Singularity:

3.0.3

Expected behavior

Some progress or update information during the creation of the SIF file.

Actual behavior

During "Creating SIF file..." step, the console does not produce any visible output for the user - but does create the resulting file eventually.

Steps to reproduce behavior

I was executing a few “larger” builds through the bui

Enhancement ImageBuilding good first issue
sorry-cypress
vladtkachuk
vladtkachuk commented Nov 11, 2021
  • I have searched issues for similar feature requests

What is this feature about (1 sentence)

Base path should be runtime configurable via the env variable.

Why is it needed? What is the value? For whom do we build it?

If one wants to expose the dashboard not on the domain root but let's say at my-domain.com/sorry-cypress/dashboard the dashboard will try to load the r

good first issue
root
eguiraud
eguiraud commented Mar 3, 2022

Current behavior:

root [0] TFile f("root://eospublic.cern.ch//eos/root-eos/benchmark/Run2012B_SingleMu.root")
Error in <TFile::TFile>: file /eos/root-eos/benchmark/Run2012B_SingleMu.root does not exist
(TFile &) Name: /eos/root-eos/benchmark/Run2012B_SingleMu.root Title:

Desirable behavior:

root [0] TFile f("root://eospublic.cern.ch//eos/root-eos/benchmark/Run2012B_Single

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the parallel topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the parallel topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more