Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
Replies: 32 suggested answers 9 replies
-
|
Hejsan! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Updated the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I tested the workflow to Add the commit to check the changes, here the Test |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Just an idea, is there a better way to store the READMEs in different languages as to not clutter the root repository folder? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
नमस्ते! (Namaste/Hello!) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Oh, okay! Thought I needed to write a comment as written in the OP for the Action to detect it |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @kilacoda I will add you to the GitHub Actions if you planning keep updating the Hindi REAMDE. Namaste 🙏🏾 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey @oleksis happy to be added to the authors for notifications. I just wrote the Brazilian portuguese translation, and keen to keep it updated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@luigibertaco Obrigado! Get the note |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Actually, one can always open a PR to add themselves to the automation workflow. Should I do that instead? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
If you wish to update the Readme workflow for participants in the discussion, they would be added manual or by a GraphQL query? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
{{editor}}'s edit
{{editor}}'s edit
Loading...
Sorry, something went wrong.
-
Authors of translations will be notified in this discussion. If you are an Author or Collaborator and want to participate, leave a comment in this discussion.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.