-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - OCaml
Code quality
Automate your code review with style, quality, security, and test‑coverage checks when you need them most. Code quality is intended to keep complexity down and runtime up.
Here are 505 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Jul 29, 2021 - Rust
-
Updated
Jul 31, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - OCaml
-
Updated
Jul 7, 2021 - JavaScript
Many repositories need to fix, so please help if you like.
If you could help, it would be helpful if you could comment before starting the work not to overlapping.
Fix example
Run exit command after lint.
echo '::group:: Running golangci-lint with reviewdog 🐶 ...'
goAffects PMD Version: 6.30.0-SNAPSHOT
Rule: UselessOverridingMethod
Description:
Note: There seems to be a difference when having the class in the auxclasspath or not (typeresolution).
Code Sample demonstrating the issue:
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 30, 2021 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 6, 2021 - Ruby
-
Updated
Jul 3, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Jul 21, 2021
And, ideally, a configurable list of annotations denoting generated source or AST structures.
See #105 for the kind of issue this seeks to avoid, and the limitations of this fix.
What's wrong
If I run WPS on such code fragments, then the error WPS000 appears, although the code is correct.
Fragment №1:
number = int(input())
if number == 1:
print("1")
else:
if number == 2: print("2")Output №1:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ilya/Desktop/venv-wps-15.2/lib/python3.8/site-packages/wemake_python_styleguide
-
Updated
Jul 2, 2021 - JavaScript
AngularJS Material uses gulp to build everything, so we're looking at using https://github.com/ivogabe/gulp-typescript for our builds. It seems like something could be built similar to the webpack plugin in order to have the types added during the Gulp pipeline.
It's not clear if typewiz-node could help with this already or not. We don't have a single main.ts to point to. Should we do somethi
-
Updated
Jul 15, 2021 - Makefile
-
Updated
May 28, 2020 - Haskell
let people add .json
Is it possible to add .json to .imgbotconfig? (.imgbotconfig.json) I’d like my syntax to be highlighted
-
Updated
Jan 7, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
Jul 29, 2021 - PHP
let x = { default: 42}; // "default" is highlighted as keyword
-
Updated
Jul 13, 2021 - PHP
-
Updated
Jul 28, 2021
undercover should create warnings on entire files that weren't required by specs and hence don't show up in the lcov output.
This can be done by changing logic starting from Undercover::Report#load_and_parse_file
Code quality apps
SoftaCheck
Static Analysis for your C/C++ Code & Doxygen Automatic Code Documentation Generation and Storage
Semgrep
Code scanning at ludicrous speed. Find bugs, apply guardrails across your repos, and get feedback in PRs, Slack, or email
Codacy
Automated code reviews to help developers ship better software, faster
Testspace.com
Integrated GitHub test solution for CI Results Dashboard, Reporting, Manual Test Case Management, and Exploratory
Lucidchart Connector
Insert a public link to a Lucidchart diagram so team members can quickly understand an issue or pull request
Code Climate
Automated code review for technical debt and test coverage
Imgbot
A GitHub app that optimizes your images
CommitCheck
CommitCheck ensures your commit messages are consistent and contain all required information
CodeFactor
Automated code review for GitHub
CodeScene
A quality visualization tool to identify and prioritize technical debt and evaluate your organizational efficiency
Code Inspector
Code Quality, Code Reviews and Technical Debt evaluation made easy
Restyled.io
Restyle Pull Requests as they're opened
abaplint
ABAP quality assurance and static analysis
TestQuality
The #1 Test Case Creation and Management for GitHub Workflows
Codecov | Code Coverage
Automatic test report merging for all CI and languages into a single code coverage report directly into your pull request



We have a problem: if files aren't loaded/required we don't have branch data. If they are added through
track_fileswe give it 0/0 branches which we show as 100% coverage (all possible branches are covered).That math is "wrong" though here because there are branches but we don't know what they are. We should probably count total branches here as "unkown" and establish that in our "math unive