-
Updated
May 2, 2021 - Python
cloudformation
Here are 1,526 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
May 2, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
May 3, 2021 - Java
-
Updated
Apr 29, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - JavaScript
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/gettingstarted-limits.html lists the maximum environment variable hard limit as 4kb.
If this limit is exceeded, the template will not deploy.
It should be possible to make an Error level rule around this
-
Updated
Mar 25, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
May 3, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 24, 2021 - CSS
-
Updated
Apr 19, 2021 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Sep 30, 2020 - Go
stelligent / mu
While testing another PR, I found that mu pipeline logs command displays information from the pipelines, but also shows this error:
$ mu pipeline logs
[... normal, expected output ...]
func1 ▶ ERROR ResourceNotFoundException: The specified log group does not exist.
status code: 400, request id: f7260741-7f69-4772-b4cc-7c6a9c22d264This error does not occur with the `-f
Describe the bug
CodeUri in Function has invalid directory name
To Reproduce
- Create a powershell package using the new-awsPowerShellLambdaPackage:
New-AWSPowerShellLambdaPackage -ScriptPath checkdomainavailable.ps1 -OutputPackage checkdomainavailable.zip
- Add the function in template.yaml
CheckDomainAvailableFunction:
Type: AWS::Serverless::Function
Pr
-
Updated
Oct 9, 2020
Add error handling during credentials onChange event so that the Scan Account feature does not activate if credentials are invalid
-
Updated
Apr 18, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Feb 22, 2021 - TypeScript
Seems like we can encrypt environment variables effectively for free by adding a KmsKeyArn property to functions. See: https://github.com/awslabs/serverless-application-model/blob/master/versions/2016-10-31.md
This would be an easy contribution for a first timer...
CloudTrail
-
Updated
Sep 12, 2018 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jan 27, 2020
-
Updated
Apr 18, 2021 - Go
-
Updated
Apr 19, 2021 - Python
The current behavior of --interactive is that any new stacks will get created, without any prompt. But this can be potentially dangerous (or at the very least, annoying) if you accidentally make a change, like changing the stack name, resulting in a whole new stack getting created.
Should stacker prompt you before creating a stack when using --interactive mode?
-
Updated
Apr 1, 2021 - Rust
-
Updated
May 1, 2021
-
Updated
Jun 15, 2020 - Shell
-
Updated
Apr 6, 2021 - Shell
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the cloudformation topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the cloudformation topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."


Hello,
Do you plan to support Terraform scans with OpenStack in the future ?
Regards