PR #19108 caused some Suspense-related DevTools regressions (more info available on #19368) which we did not catch because of the fact that DevTools tests are only run against the version of React in master.

We should follow the precedent of the regression fixtures tests and have CI run DevTools tests against multiple

Most items coming from questions on the community forum

• a proper multicategory bar example based on https://community.plotly.com/t/multicategory-axis-type-example/26392
• example of shape or annotation covering several subplots thanks to xref='paper'. Also the shapes and annotations tutorial should link to each other.
• orthographic projection example in 3d axes tutorial (or

I really would appreciate feedback here. It is so hard for me to see it since I've been so close to this for so long and I've developed apps in this manner for 10 years. I'm going to be the worst person to write the documentation since it is all so second nature for me. Yet, I am most likely going to be the person writing the documentation since I understand how everything works so well.

So can

Would love to see support for the strings.Repeat(s string, count int) string go function within OPA's built-in functions.

I am using the output of the walk function to create "fingerprints" of highly nested objects and need to output a list of strings for all paths. I have a work arounds, but this would be much cleaner if the Repeat function were added to builtins.

Expected Behavior

Right now the tutorial is coherently designed, tested, and even documented. However, it doesn't build up in a way that's very beginner friendly. It establishes glom's value and then immediately uses it at an intermediate level.

I'd like it if it was a bit more drawn out to use basic features first and then add a multi-line Coalesce as the

It may be nice to ultimately just update these tests to read the data/blocks dir and run tests against each automatically so it's easier to manage these tests

This is a part of #11

I decided to extract it since it is a big feature.

As a SDET
I want a documentation or Wiki page where the expected vs actual field matching is explained
So that I can use these in my test automation to test the server response payloads and headers
e.g. id=123 , id="123", isValid=true, isValid="true" etc

AC1:

Cover the following currently supported mechanisms with examples

• $EQ
• (int)
• (float) or (decimal)
• (boolean)

It would be nice to optionally be possible to tell the FormikDebug component to render in production mode anyway.

The Generated Client API is remains largely undocumented...

It would also be awesome if we could include the documentation of the API in the Generated DSL

seems like this is triggering drop / add

- create unique index tbl_x_y on levels(x, y);
+ create unique index tbl_x_y on levels (x, y);

and it shouldn't