-
Updated
Jul 31, 2021 - C++
adaptive-mesh-refinement
Here are 23 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Jul 22, 2021 - C
When creating a new simulation from scratch, I had to bounce between the equations/ folder and the examples/ folder to figure out the syntax for a new set of initial & boundary conditions. Ideally, the examples would be self-contained; from the user's point of view, there's nothing special about boundary_condition_two_interacting_blast_waves, which is exported as part of Trixi's API - it's o
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Aug 1, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Aug 21, 2019 - Fortran
-
Updated
Jan 28, 2019 - C++
-
Updated
May 4, 2019 - Fortran
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - Shell
-
Updated
Aug 1, 2021 - C
-
Updated
Apr 17, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Nov 13, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Jul 26, 2021 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 16, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Jul 21, 2021 - C++
-
Updated
Nov 14, 2017 - Fortran
-
Updated
Nov 20, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Aug 24, 2018 - C#
-
Updated
Apr 23, 2021 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Dec 3, 2019 - C++
-
Updated
Apr 22, 2018 - C++
-
Updated
Jul 30, 2021 - C++
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the adaptive-mesh-refinement topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the adaptive-mesh-refinement topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."


castro.change_max = 1.0means that the timestep can only ever stay the same or decrease relative to its initial value. I think we should disallow this value, I have a hard time imagining a use case for this (if you want a fixed timestep, use fixed_dt, and if you want a timestep cap but still allow the timestep to decrease, use max_dt). It causes problems with the retry functionality.