
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
Hi Team,
I have been actively working on Mix-panel AB Test from a while now. I see there are few flaws that would have been taken care to make the AB Test experience little smooth.
As per the documentation and implementation -
The sequence of events are mentioned below:
- Listener implementation ON-CREATE of the application (before setting people property as that will be received on Login Or Sign-Up)
I am in touch with Mix-panel support from a while now. Let me describe the issues I have faced -
Sometimes listener not getting called, for the new user profile creation in mix panel usually sign up the case (frequency 2 out of 5 times)
As per the documentation, it says values are received with 10 seconds or more depending upon when the decide API gets called. The developer has to handle the first screen AB test by holding the user until callbacks are received in OnMixpanelUpdatesReceivedListener followed by OnMixpanelTweaksUpdatedListener.
Drawback - Sometimes even if the user profile is created in mix panel it takes it own sweet time to give the experiment back. Even if you flush the values at regular intervals also. If the developer has the method to know when exactly the decide API is called and whether the experiment is received or not, to continue ahead it would be very helpful.
Opting out a user from the AB Test
I have been trying to opt out the targetted user from AB test if decision point has been crossed and tweak value is not received, but as far as I know and as per the discussion with support, we don’t have any such option from the client end to do.
Let me give you a scenario -
After logging out the user, the user gets re-register for the update and tweak the listener on the onCreate method of the application.
_Mix panel replies -_ After you reset and unregister properties, Mix-panel sees the next events as a new user.
The value received after re-registering is totally different from what we received earlier i.e. FALSE (FREE_TRIAL_DISABLED) – People Property Not Set
_Mix panel replies -_ I would expect the value received after re-registering to be either TRUE or FALSE because it is randomly assigned in the A/B test.
Once the same user logs in again, ideally he should get the same tweak value i.e. TRUE (FREE_TRIAL_ENABLED)
Mix panel replies - I would expect if the same first user re-logs in that they would get the same tweak value as when they registered TRUE
Drawback - If the decision point is crossed and user went ahead with the default user flow (tweak value), it doesn’t make sense to give the same user experiment again and there is no guarantee that he will receive the same user flow tweak value. There is the possibility he can receive different tweak value as well.