The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20201008212246/https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Python/pull/3035
Skip to content

/ Python

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Hacktoberfest 2020: Project Euler 65 Solution #3035

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
from
Open

Hacktoberfest 2020: Project Euler 65 Solution #3035

wants to merge 3 commits into from
+91 −0

Conversation

@peteryao7
Copy link

@peteryao7 peteryao7 commented Oct 8, 2020

Describe your change:

Adds a solution and explanation for Project Euler 65 (not 67). Part of issue #2695.

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.
peteryao7 added 2 commits Oct 8, 2020
@peteryao7
Add solution for Project Euler 65, Fixes: #2695
Loading status checks…
fa750c9
@peteryao7
Add URL to problem 65 and don't pass in parameter to solution()
Loading status checks…
ad934bf
@TravisBuddy
Copy link

@TravisBuddy TravisBuddy commented Oct 8, 2020

Travis tests have failed

Hey @peteryao7,
Please read the following log in order to understand the failure reason.
It'll be awesome if you fix what's wrong and commit the changes.

TravisBuddy Request Identifier: 7fd0dd00-0945-11eb-b9d6-41d4da7e5060
@peteryao7
Remove solution() tests
Loading status checks…
6fbc596
@peteryao7
Copy link
Author

@peteryao7 peteryao7 commented Oct 8, 2020

^ removed solution() parameter but forgot to remove its tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants
@peteryao7 @TravisBuddy
You can’t perform that action at this time.