fact-checking
Here are 70 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - Shell
Add more tests
Frontend doesn't have enough unit testing. These are the parts that should be tested in priority:
State
-
video_debate/comments/reducer.js -
video_debate/comments/selectors.js -
video_debate/statements/reducer.js -
video_debate/statements/selectors.js -
video_debate/video/reducer.js
Components
TODO
As-is
- After inputting reason, the reason submission button jumps up and cancels the first click
- During submission, there is no visual feedback indicating that the reply request is being sent
To-be
- Don't change reason input height when reason input is
As-is
看來是因為我們在使用者回報一個回應有用時,會這樣問使用者:
這個提問導致使用者輸入「沒有」然後送出。但在 Cofacts 網站上,就會看到有一堆人 upvote 然後又表示「沒有」,有點沒頭沒尾。

-
Updated
Mar 14, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Sep 6, 2020 - Vue
-
Updated
Aug 26, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Dec 24, 2019 - HTML
-
Updated
Apr 12, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 22, 2018 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Feb 4, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 24, 2017 - PHP
-
Updated
Sep 8, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Sep 19, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - TypeScript
-
Updated
Sep 11, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
May 11, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 28, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Jan 17, 2019 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 14, 2017 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Nov 19, 2019
-
Updated
Sep 19, 2019 - Jupyter Notebook
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the fact-checking topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the fact-checking topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."




In #147 we modified the reply sending logic so that it first sets
hyperlinksto a temp value and rely on promises to fill inhyperlinksafter loading finishes.However, the procedure may fail and cause forever polling scenario like this:
https://cofacts.g0v.tw/reply/H4TBinABWiTSPYAZPHxn
Needs further discussion on