The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20200911185419/https://github.com/topics/fact-checking
Skip to content
#

fact-checking

Here are 70 public repositories matching this topic...

Betree
Betree commented Aug 22, 2018

Frontend doesn't have enough unit testing. These are the parts that should be tested in priority:

State

  • video_debate/comments/reducer.js
  • video_debate/comments/selectors.js
  • video_debate/statements/reducer.js
  • video_debate/statements/selectors.js
  • video_debate/video/reducer.js

Components

TODO

MrOrz
MrOrz commented Jul 22, 2020

As-is

From https://g0v.hackmd.io/OC7BneJ3TEGJHge1hWV-0w?both#%E5%9B%9E%E6%87%89%E3%80%8C%E6%B2%92%E6%9C%89%E3%80%8D%E7%9A%84%E6%AD%A3%E8%A9%95

看來是因為我們在使用者回報一個回應有用時,會這樣問使用者:

這個提問導致使用者輸入「沒有」然後送出。但在 Cofacts 網站上,就會看到有一堆人 upvote 然後又表示「沒有」,有點沒頭沒尾。
![image](https://user-ima

captain-fact

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the fact-checking topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the fact-checking topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more

You can’t perform that action at this time.