The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20200829023440/https://github.com/topics/compatibility
Skip to content
#

compatibility

Here are 167 public repositories matching this topic...

jrfnl
jrfnl commented Jul 11, 2020

As per my comments in #1162:

  • Deprecated features should be a warning
  • Removed features should be an error
  • New features should be an error
  • For the few things which don't fall in the above categories: whether it is an error/warning should depend on how PHP handles the issue, i.e. does it cause a PHP parse/fatal error or a notice or warning to be thrown ?

Similarly for the error

yamahata
yamahata commented Jan 30, 2019

native glibc (not-modified for graphene or USE_clone_FOR_fork defined) uses clone(2) syscall for fork(3) library function
as clone(CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHD, 0, NULL, &THREAD_SELF->tid)

This doesn't work as expected and the execution stalls somewhere. I guess it's not tested
because modified glibc uses fork(2) system call, not clone(2).

Once this is fixed, glibc modi

andipabst
andipabst commented Nov 4, 2019

I am contributing to a project where the maintainer has set up revapi. Sometimes when I e.g. add a new method to a public API, revapi warns me during the maven build, that this will break semantic versioning. And I think this is great.

But then I got a problem, because I don't know by heart, if I have to increase the patch, minor or even the major version. So it would be really helpful to inclu

Improve this page

Add a description, image, and links to the compatibility topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.

Curate this topic

Add this topic to your repo

To associate your repository with the compatibility topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."

Learn more

You can’t perform that action at this time.