I would like to be able to prevent certain headers (Authorization: X-Auth-Token:, etc ) from being included in the caddy logs.

I found caddyserver/caddy#3562, which is asking to be able to set an allowlist of headers, which makes sense for their use case.

In my case, a blocklist, makes more sense, as I only want to prevent a single header from being included in the

I am using openSSL 1.1.1g.

In order to be compatible with Web Crypto API (and its wrapper openCrypto) regarding encryption RSA keys, The pKCS8 (and PBKDF2) is needed. The documentation is lacking info on PKCS5_pbe2_set_iv. Is it possible to create it? Thanks.

Right now in different places in the SE codebase there are references to /opt and then as well to /usr.

All SE code should reference one place only. Could someone please create a PR that fixes this.

This PR should also take PR #454 into consideration (no conflicts)

Describe the solution you'd like
helm-docs Is a nice little utility for auto-generating the Parameters table from comments in the values.yaml file. It would make PRs into the chart much easier, because you don't need to document in multiple places, and you don't need to edit a huge markdown table.

If you're open to this, I could probably work a PR f

There's little information about what keys and values are in the output, what it means and how they are related to the screen output. In general that needs to be added. (special topics see #1675, #1674)

Problem:

As mentioned in the comment New cipher suites MUST be added here, IN ORDER, or they will not be properly initialized.

https://github.com/awslabs/s2n/blob/64297d8ce45a38394094f1c31b2ecf5735472edb/tls/s2n_cipher_suites.c#L768-L772

Solution:

Unit test to validate the array order.

• **Does

Description

Side-port of #3509

Status

READY

Requires Backporting

No - not a bug, just enhancing source readability by reducing noise.

Migrations

NO

What would you like to be added

Add support for a DynamoDB storage backend. Although MySQL is available, it would require to run a RDS Instance for it. Extra costs, backup considerations, etc. Even with Aurora Serverless.

DynamoDB is just there, scales as needed with OnDemand pricing and has fine backup capabilities.

Why this is needed

We plan to run step-ca in AWS ECS on Farga