mxnet
Here are 546 public repositories matching this topic...
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - JavaScript
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 24, 2020 - C++
[Bug] - Output type of QuantizeLinear operator should be uint8_t if y_zero_point is not provided
Spawned off https://github.com/onnx/onnx/pull/2772/files/7ab93cc1b635eada330dae7424d4ff7e8c22c295#r440422245, opening issue to track resolution
-
Updated
Aug 16, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jun 10, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 14, 2020 - Python
Hi, thanks for the great code!
I wonder do you have plans to support resuming from checkpoints for classification? As we all know, in terms of training ImageNet, the training process is really long and it can be interrupted somehow, but I haven't notice any code related to "resume" in scripts/classification/train_imagenet.py.
Maybe @hetong007 ? Thanks in advance.
-
Updated
Aug 23, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Aug 14, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Mar 2, 2020
-
Updated
Aug 19, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - Python
I have the same hardware envs, same network, but I could not get the result as you, almost half as you. Any best practices and experience? thanks very much! for bytePS with 1 instance and 8 GPU, I have similar testing result.
Well, Gumbel Distribution is magical. Basically, given a sequence of K logits, i.e., "\log a_1, \log a_2, ..., \log a_K" and K independent gumbel random variables, i.e., "g_1, g_2, ..., g_K". We have
\argmax_i \log a_i + g_i ~ Categorical({a_i / sum(a)})
This gives you a very simple way to sampl
-
Updated
Aug 24, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Aug 15, 2020
-
Updated
Aug 17, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jul 23, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
May 20, 2020 - Java
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - C++
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - Python
-
Updated
Jan 24, 2020 - Python
Yolo Model
Description
Implement a YOLO model and add it to the DJL model zoo
References
-
Updated
Aug 18, 2020 - Jupyter Notebook
-
Updated
Aug 25, 2020 - Python
Improve this page
Add a description, image, and links to the mxnet topic page so that developers can more easily learn about it.
Add this topic to your repo
To associate your repository with the mxnet topic, visit your repo's landing page and select "manage topics."


Description
This is a documentation bug. The parameter of API
mxnet.test_utils.check_numeric_gradientis not consistent between signature and Parameter section. There is a parametercheck_epsin the Parameter section, but it is not in the signature.Link to document: https://mxnet.apache.org/versions/1.6/api/python/docs/api/mxnet/test_utils/index.html#mxnet.test_utils.check_numeric_gra