I've seen (in Reddit) that some people are misunderstanding the CoC and/or anticipating CoC abuse. I think a good approach to deal with these reactions would be to add a diplomatic, pedagogic FAQ to the CoC addressing the most common questions and potential issues (e.g., what happens if you didn't know the word you were using was offensive to someone somewhere, how you should react if you were unj

Like https://www.inc.com/zoe-henry/aapd-disability-equality-index-2017.html...
It is in the same line as ageism, we don't talk about it but it is also a form of exclusion.

Because people are too dumb to understand the importance of including useful social promotions such as the ones for LGBTQ community, women's rights, and other positive things we will change the group rules so it is more clear that this is encouraged.

To me it seems like a natural assumption that
HourEnding would have inclusivity of false, true,
and HourBeginning would have inclusivity of true, false

but I am not sure if I am typical or not.