Seems great, and the <details> thing seems like a good idea for the configuration.

There are two things about the old, slightly-more-specific template that I thought were effective:

• The rigid format that suggested that people paste a command and an output at the top. This doesn't always apply, but it's good for about 90% of cases. With the more common but more vague "steps to reproduce"/"actual result" sections, I notice that people are sometimes encouraged to write in free-form prose about what they tried to do. That's nice to have too, but only when it's accompanied by the actual command and and actual, complete paste of the output. Including that beet -vv there helps people immediately see what they need to do to get that invaluable debug output.
• The "Turning off plugins made problem go away (yes/no):" prompt is also helpful because so many problems can be traced to plugins—but we really depend on people experimentally figuring out which one. So while it would be great to describe the process of disabling plugins one at a time in the accompanying wiki page, I like having that line there to be an obvious, visceral reminder that this should be your first recourse when trying to track down the root cause of a problem.

That makes sense, I added a bit more handholding in the template as you suggest borrowing from the old template.

Keep in mind you're the one dealing with 99.9% of the issues on this repo, so I'm just trying to help you out. If you feel any of these changes are worse for you, you won't hurt my feelings.

So I goofed and removed my fork and consequently the "how to create a good bug report" wiki page. Not sure if any of these changes are worth merging (perhaps just the config dropdown?), but I can rebase this and change whatever.