Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.
History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.
The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.
This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.
Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.
The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.
This collection is a set of Github repository archives from two major sets: A panic grab upon the acquisition by Microsoft, and a larger, ongoing set of Pretty Much Everything.
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20200911072102/https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/imbalanced-learn
Drop `from sklearn.utils.fixes import np_version`
The specification for `np_version` changed in `scikit-learn`,
leading to an error when tests ran.
However, the test was whether the `numpy` version was less than
`1.7.0`, which is outside the minimum version specified in
`setup.py` and `requirements.txt`
imbalanced-learn is a python package offering a number of re-sampling techniques
commonly used in datasets showing strong between-class imbalance.
It is compatible with scikit-learn and is part of scikit-learn-contrib
projects.
Documentation
Installation documentation, API documentation, and examples can be found on the
documentation.
Installation
Dependencies
imbalanced-learn is tested to work under Python 3.6+.
The dependency requirements are based on the last scikit-learn release:
scipy(>=0.19.1)
numpy(>=1.13.3)
scikit-learn(>=0.23)
joblib(>=0.11)
keras 2 (optional)
tensorflow (optional)
Additionally, to run the examples, you need matplotlib(>=2.0.0) and
pandas(>=0.22).
Installation
imbalanced-learn is currently available on the PyPi's repository and you can
install it via pip:
pip install -U imbalanced-learn
The package is release also in Anaconda Cloud platform:
conda install -c conda-forge imbalanced-learn
If you prefer, you can clone it and run the setup.py file. Use the following
commands to get a copy from GitHub and install all dependencies:
git clone https://github.com/scikit-learn-contrib/imbalanced-learn.git
cd imbalanced-learn
pip install .
After installation, you can use pytest to run the test suite:
make coverage
Development
The development of this scikit-learn-contrib is in line with the one
of the scikit-learn community. Therefore, you can refer to their
Development Guide.
About
If you use imbalanced-learn in a scientific publication, we would appreciate
citations to the following paper:
@article{JMLR:v18:16-365,
author = {Guillaume Lema{{\^i}}tre and Fernando Nogueira and Christos K. Aridas},
title = {Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning},
journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
year = {2017},
volume = {18},
number = {17},
pages = {1-5},
url = {http://jmlr.org/papers/v18/16-365}
}
Most classification algorithms will only perform optimally when the number of
samples of each class is roughly the same. Highly skewed datasets, where the
minority is heavily outnumbered by one or more classes, have proven to be a
challenge while at the same time becoming more and more common.
One way of addressing this issue is by re-sampling the dataset as to offset this
imbalance with the hope of arriving at a more robust and fair decision boundary
than you would otherwise.
Re-sampling techniques are divided in two categories:
Under-sampling the majority class(es).
Over-sampling the minority class.
Combining over- and under-sampling.
Create ensemble balanced sets.
Below is a list of the methods currently implemented in this module.
: I. Mani, J. Zhang. “kNN approach to unbalanced data distributions: A case study involving information extraction,” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Learning from Imbalanced Data Sets, pp. 1-7, 2003.
: M. Kubat, S. Matwin, “Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: One-sided selection,” In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 97, pp. 179-186, 1997.
: J. Laurikkala, “Improving identification of difficult small classes by balancing class distribution,” Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe, pp. 63-66, 2001.
: D. Wilson, “Asymptotic Properties of Nearest Neighbor Rules Using Edited Data,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetrics, vol. 2(3), pp. 408-421, 1972.
: M. R. Smith, T. Martinez, C. Giraud-Carrier, “An instance level analysis of data complexity,” Machine learning, vol. 95(2), pp. 225-256, 2014.
[8]
(1, 2) : N. V. Chawla, K. W. Bowyer, L. O. Hall, W. P. Kegelmeyer, “SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique,” Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, vol. 16, pp. 321-357, 2002.
: H. Han, W.-Y. Wang, B.-H. Mao, “Borderline-SMOTE: A new over-sampling method in imbalanced data sets learning,” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent Computing, pp. 878-887, 2005.
: H. M. Nguyen, E. W. Cooper, K. Kamei, “Borderline over-sampling for imbalanced data classification,” In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on computational Intelligence and Applications, pp. 24-29, 2009.
: G. E. A. P. A. Batista, R. C. Prati, M. C. Monard, “A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data,” ACM Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, vol. 6(1), pp. 20-29, 2004.
: G. E. A. P. A. Batista, A. L. C. Bazzan, M. C. Monard, “Balancing training data for automated annotation of keywords: A case study,” In Proceedings of the 2nd Brazilian Workshop on Bioinformatics, pp. 10-18, 2003.
: X.-Y. Liu, J. Wu and Z.-H. Zhou, “Exploratory undersampling for class-imbalance learning,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 39(2), pp. 539-550, 2009.
[14]
(1, 2) : I. Tomek, “An experiment with the edited nearest-neighbor rule,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 6(6), pp. 448-452, 1976.
: H. He, Y. Bai, E. A. Garcia, S. Li, “ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning,” In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1322-1328, 2008.
: Seiffert, C., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Van Hulse, J., & Napolitano, A. "RUSBoost: A hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 40.1 (2010): 185-197.
About
A Python Package to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learning