It can't test shell aliases and function, can it? :)

For each Job, it adds plots about density, cumulative mean, and so on. But two files are named BenchmarkDotNet.Artifacts/results/MyBench.Sleeps-Time50--density.png and BenchmarkDotNet.Artifacts/results/MyBench.Sleeps-Time50--facetDensity.png, with the -- instead of single. Like some iteration variable is empty (since later there are names with -Default-
![image](https://user-images.github

I think the explanations/requirements surrounding the parameter (e.g. in multiple and update tests) could be clarified a bit, e.g. in updates-ii 'query' is highlighted as a symbol, but in iii 'queries' is highlighted as a symbol, which is confusing as to what the correct parameter name is. I think the former might be a formatting typo.

Also, it refers to it as a query parameter, whereas in mult

Describe the bug
We are using clang 8 with libc++ with libc++'s thread annotation enabled by -D_LIBCPP_ENABLE_THREAD_SAFETY_ANNOTATIONS globally. However, it conflicts with benchmark's mutex wrapper's thread annotation.

System
Which OS, compiler, and compiler version are you using:

• OS: Linux
• Compiler and version: clang 8 with libc++

To reproduce
Steps to reproduc

Hi,

The results computed here could be difficult to read and their is no documentation about how they are computed.

The idea is to display :

• CPU / RAM of sieger
• CPU / RAM of targets
• Runtime / flag compilation
• Steps (warm-up ...)
• Sieger tool
• Sieger options

Results,

Supersed #68

It would be useful to have some documentation on the recommended approach for generating UUIDs from Lua sysbench scripts. Some all-Lua uuid modules out there are actually not thread-safe and require hacks to get to work properly.

However, there is a thread-safe FFI/cdef-based UUID generation Lua module here:

https://github.com/AlexWoo/lua-uuid/blob/master/uuid.lua

It would be good to eith

I stumbled across <interaction> and ts_interaction_server, but I'm not sure what the use case is or how it is supposed to be used.

Has anyone used this recently and can add some documentation? Or explain to me how this works and I'll write something.

/cc @nniclausse

I changed a benchmark to do twice as much work per iteration, and added a multiplier of 2 in the .throughput() to account for this. Time taken per iteration went up, but so did throughput. However criterion reported this as a regression, which is wrong/misleading.

When throughput is provided, "regression" and "improvement" labels should probably be based on throughput rather than time per ite

Hi, I'm looking around for test my linux based machine whit docker but don't see the 'how to' anywhere, someone know how to run the official test suite?

http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/documentation/

thanks in advance,

There should be a more intuitive way to select the size range on which benchmarks are run.

The chart has an option to highlight the active range. We could make that highlight interactive, for example: let me drag the endpoints of the highlighted range to change it.

We should still display the exact numerical value of the current size range somewhere on the toolbar, but the current popup butt

As far as I understand according to #228 the preparation code output should be stripped of any and all <script> tags, yet it only strips the first script tag it finds. This is due to String.prototype.replace() stopping after the first match unless a RegExp with the global flag is used.

However d

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
N/A

Describe the solution you'd like
更新首页信息
1 增加版本说明
2 简化说明文案

Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A

Additional context
N/A

If you modify jmh-extras and run the with-FlightRecorderProfiler scripted test, the local modifications won't be picked up. The reason is that the scripted test doesn't set the version of extras so the default (non snapshot) version is used.

The workaround is:

diff --git a/plugin/src/sbt-test/sbt-jmh/with-FlightRecorderProfiler/build.sbt b/plugin/src/sbt-test/sbt-jmh/with-FlightRecor