The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20180604070602/https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F0-387-30845-8_238

Petrology

1989 Edition

Tephra

  • J. W. Cole
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-30845-8_238
How to cite

The term tephra (from the Greek for ash) was first used by Aristotle in an account of an eruption of Hièra (Vulcano) in his book “Meteorologica.” It refers to the clastic volcanic material that is transported from the vent through the air during an eruption (Thorarinsson, 1954) and thus is a parallel term to lava, which signifies all the molten material flowing from a vent. It is particularly useful for general description of predominantly unconsolidated pyroclastic deposits (Schmid, 1981), as the term implies no particular grain size. Ash, on the other hand, has been specifically defined by Fisher (1961) as pyroclastic debris of diameter <2 mm and pumice is restricted by many authors to pyroclastic debris that will float on water.

The composition of tephra may range from acidic to basic, depending on the host magma, and the content can vary from entirely primary fragments to entirely accessory fragments ( Wentworth and Williams, 1932). Whether the term should be restricted to airfall...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Cas, R. A. F. and J. V. Wright, 1987, Volcanic Successions: Modern and Ancient. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  2. Cole, J. W., 1970, Description and correlation of Holocene volcanic formations in the Tarawere-Rerewhakaaitu region, Trans. R. Soc. N. Zld 8(7), 93–108.Google Scholar
  3. Fisher, R. V., 1961, Proposed classification of volcaniclastic sediments and rocks, Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 72, 1409–1414.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, R. V. and H.-U. Schmincke, 1984, Pyroclastic Rocks. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Healy, J., C. G. Vucetich, and W. A. Pullar, 1964, Stratigraphy and chronology of Late Quaternary volcanic ash in Taupo, Rotorua and Gisborne districts, Bull. N. Zld Geol. Surv. 73.Google Scholar
  6. Kohn, B. P., 1970, Identification of New Zealand tephra-layers by emission spectrographic analysis of their titanomagnetites, Lithos 3, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schmid, R., 1981, Descriptive nomenclature and classification of pyroclastic deposits and fragments: recommendations of the IUGS Subcommission on the Systematics of Igneous Rocks, Geology 9, 41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Self, S. and R. S. J. Sparks, eds., 1981, Tephra Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  9. Seward, D., 1976, Tephrostratigraphy of the marine sediments in the Wanganui Basin, New Zealand, N. Zld J. Geol. Geophys. 19(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  10. Thorarinsson, S., 1944, Tefrokronoligiska Studies pa Island, Geogr. Annal. Stockholm 26, 1–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thorarinsson, S., 1954, The Eruption of Hekla 1947–48 Pt. 2—The Tephra Fall from Hekla on March 29th, 1947, Soc. Sci. Islandica: Reykjavik.Google Scholar
  12. Thorarinsson, S., 1969, A Pleistocene ignimbrite in Thorsmark, Natturufraedingurinn 39, 139–145.Google Scholar
  13. Thorarinsson, S. and G. E. Sigvaldason, 1972, The Hekla Eruption of 1970, Bull. Volcanol. 36, 269–288.Google Scholar
  14. Verosub, K. L., 1981, The interrelationship between magnetostratigraphy and tephrochronology, in S. Self and R. S. J. Sparks, eds., Tephra Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel, 65–72.Google Scholar
  15. Walker, G. P. L., 1980, The Taupo pumice: product of the most powerful known (ultraplinian) eruption, J. Volcan. Geotherm. Res. 8, 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wentworth, C. K. and H. Williams, 1932, The classification and terminology of pyroclastic rocks, Bull. Nat. Res. Council Washington 89, 19–53.Google Scholar
  17. Williams, H. and A. R. McBirney, 1979, Volcanology. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Van Nostrand Reinhold 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Cole

There are no affiliations available