Skip to main content
Log in

Adaptive copy move forgery detection based on new keypoint feature and matching

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Copy-move forgery, where an image region is copied into another part of the same image, is one of the most common and easy-to-implement image tampering techniques. Keypoint (also called feature point)-based detection methods exhibit remarkable performance in terms of computational cost and robustness. However, these methods have the following limitations to varying degrees: 1) Failure to extract keypoints from small or smooth regions; 2) Lack of robust and discriminative descriptors for keypoints; 3) Low accuracy and excessive computational cost of keypoints matching; 4) High false negative/positive rate caused by the defects of post processing. To overcome such limitations, we propose an adaptive copy move forgery detection based on new keypoint feature and matching in this paper. Firstly, based on the simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC) and the multi-directional multi-layer double-cross pattern (MDML-DCP), i.e., the segmentation method is adopted, and uniform key points are adaptively extracted from the whole image (including small and smooth regions) by fitting the MDML-DCP value-threshold function of superpixels. Then, due to the strong robustness of moment features to attacks and their stronger descriptive ability compared to traditional invariant moments. Secondly, texture features can get more distinctive features. Next, accurate quaternion fractional pseudo-Jacobi-Fourier moments (AQFPJFM) and gradient local ternary patterns (GLTP) describe the key points to obtain robust and discriminative features. Then, the ITQ-PTH algorithm is introduced for keypoint matching, which is more accurate than traditional locality-sensitive hashing algorithms and can improve the matching accuracy. Finally, the false negative rate and false positive rate are reduced by reliable post-processing methods. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves an F-score of 96.61% and 95.18% on GRIP and MICC-F600 datasets, respectively, which is 2.71 and 3.07 percentage points higher than the latest method, and the accuracy is also higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability and access

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Verma M, Singh D (2024) Survey on image copy-move forgery detection. Multimed Tools Appl 83:23761–23797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh G, Singh K (2024) Copy-move video forgery detection techniques: a systematic survey with comparisons, challenges and future directions. Wirel Pers Commun 134:1863–1913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar S, Mukherjee S, Pal AK (2021) An efficient copy move forgery detection using adaptive watershed segmentation with AGSO and hybrid feature extraction. J Vis Commun Image Represent 74:102966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed IT, Hammad BT, Jamil N (2021) Image copy-move forgery detection algorithms based on spatial feature domain. In: 2021 IEEE 17th International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications, pp 92–96

  5. Yilan W, Xiaobing K, Yajun C (2020) Robust and accurate detection of image copy-move forgery using PCET-SVD and histogram of block similarity measures. J Inf Secur Appl 54:102536

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paul S, Pal AK (2021) A fast copy-move image forgery detection approach on a reduced search space. Multimed Tools Appl 82:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar S, Mukherjee S, Pal AK (2023) An improved reduced feature-based copy-move forgery detection technique. Multimed Tools Appl 82:1431–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Walia S, Kumar K, Kumar M (2023) Unveiling digital image forgeries using markov based quaternions in frequency domain and fusion of machine learning algorithms. Multimed Tools Appl 82:4517–4532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iseed SY, Mahmoud KW (2023) Forensic approach for distinguishing between source and destination regions in copy-move forgery. Multimed Tools Appl 82(20):31181–31210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang J, Liang Z, Gan Y, Zhong J (2021) A novel copy-move forgery detection algorithm via two-stage filtering. Digit Signal Process 113:103032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar N, Meenpal T (2023) Salient keypoint-based copy-move image forgery detection. Aust J Forensic Sci 55:331–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gan Y, Zhong J, Vong C (2022) A novel copy-move forgery detection algorithm via feature label matching and hierarchical segmentation filtering. Inf Process Manag 59:102783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta M, Singh P (2021) An image forensic technique based on SIFT descriptors and FLANN based matching. In: 2021 12th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologie, pp 1–7

  14. Sujin JS, Sophia S (2024) High-performance image forgery detection via adaptive SIFT feature extraction for low-contrast or small or smooth copy-move region images. Soft Comput 28(1):437–445

  15. Diwan A et al (2023) Unveiling copy-move forgeries: Enhancing detection with superpoint keypoint architecture. IEEE Access 11:86132–86148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang J et al (2023) A novel copy-move forgery detection algorithm via gradient-hash matching and simplified cluster-based filtering. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 37:2350011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixit A, Bag S (2021) A fast technique to detect copy-move image forgery with reflection and non-affine transformation attacks. Expert Syst Appl 182:115282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aydın Y (2022) A new copy-move forgery detection method using LIOP. J Vis Commun Image Represent 89:103661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Islam A, Long CJ, Basharat A, Hoogs A (2020) Doa-gan: dual-order attentive generative adversarial network for image copy-move forgery detection and localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 4675–4684

  20. Jiang XY, Liu CX (2021) Edge and region inconsistency-guided image splicing tamper detection network. J Image Graph 26:2411–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mazumdar A, Bora PK (2022) Two-stream encoder-decoder network for localizing image forgeries. J Vis Commun Image Represent 82:103417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong C et al (2022) Mvss-net: multi-view multi-scale supervised networks for image manipulation detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 45:3539–3553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Achanta R et al (2012) SLIC superpixels compared to state-of-the-art superpixel methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34:2274–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ding C et al (2016) Multi-directional multi-level dual-cross patterns for robust face recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 38:518–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X et al (2022) Accurate quaternion fractional-order pseudo-Jacobi-Fourier moments. Pattern Anal Appl 25:731–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Upneja R, Singh C (2015) Fast computation of Jacobi-Fourier moments for invariant image recognition. Pattern Recogn 48:1836–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahmed F, Hossain E (2013) Automated facial expression recognition using gradient-based ternary texture patterns. Chin J Eng 2013:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gong Y et al (2012) Iterative quantization: a procrustean approach to learning binary codes for large-scale image retrieval. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35:2916–2929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mao Z, Wang Q, Zhang Y (2018) Post tuned hashing: a new approach to indexing high-dimensional data. ACM Multimedia 834–842

  30. Zhu Y et al (2022) Hierarchical clustering that takes advantage of both density-peak and density-connectivity. Inf Syst 103:101871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ester M, Kriegel HP, Sander J, Xu X (1996) A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proc Second Int Conf Knowl Discov Data Min 1996:226–231

  32. Rodriguez A, Laio A (2014) Clustering by fast search and find of density peaks. Science 344:1492–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hossein-Nejad Z, Nasri M (2017) An adaptive image registration method based on SIFT features and RANSAC transform. Comput Electr Eng 62:524–537

  34. Zhang X et al (2013) Edge strength similarity for image quality assessment. IEEE Signal Process Lett 20:319–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cozzolino D, Poggi G, Verdoliva L (2015) Efficient dense-field copy-move forgery detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 10:2284–2297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Christlein V, Riess C, Jordan J, Riess C, Angelopoulou E (2012) An evaluation of popular copy-move forgery detection approaches. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 7:1841–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Amerini I, Ballan L, Caldelli R, Bimbo A, Tongo LD, Serra G (2013) Copy-move forgery detection and localization by means of robust clustering with J-Linkage. Signal Process: Image Commun 28:659–669

    Google Scholar 

  38. Silva E, Carvalho TJ, Ferreira A, Rocha A (2015) Going deeper into copy-move forgery detection: exploring image telltales via multi-scale analysis and voting processes. J Vis Commun Image Represent 29:16–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zandi M, Aznaveh AM, Talebpour A (2016) Iterative copy-move forgery detection based on a new interest point detector. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 11:2499–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Li Y, Zhou J (2019) Fast and effective image copy-move forgery detection via hierarchical feature point matching. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 14:1307–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhong J, Pun C (2019) An end-to-end dense-inceptionnet for image copy-move forgery detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 15:2134–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhong J, Pun C (2020) Two-pass hashing feature representation and searching method for copy-move forgery detection. Inf Sci 512:675–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Niu P, Wang C, Chen W, Yang H, Wang X (2021) Fast and effective keypoint-based image copy-move forgery detection using complex-valued moment invariants. J Vis Commun Image Represent 77:103068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang C et al (2023) Shrinking the semantic gap: Spatial pooling of local moment invariants for copy-move forgery detection. IEEE Trans Inf Forensic Secur 18:1064–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported partially by LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (No. XLYC2203032), Key Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Education Department (No. LJKZZ20220115), High End Scientific Research Achievement Cultivation Funding Plan of Liaoning Normal University (No. 24GDL003), and Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Provincial Education Department (No. LJKMZ20221420).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiangyang Wang: Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Writing- review & editing. Huiying Zhang: Methodology, Software, Writing -original draft, Writing- review & editing. Dawei Wang: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing—review & editing. Panpan Niu: Conceptualization, Project administration, Methodology, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiangyang Wang or Panpan Niu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical standard

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Zhang, H., Wang, D. et al. Adaptive copy move forgery detection based on new keypoint feature and matching. Appl Intell 55, 864 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-025-06735-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-025-06735-4

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Xiangyang Wang