Skip to main content

A Classificatory Topos: Refining Evolving Knowledge in Multi-agent Learning Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence (MIWAI 2025)

Abstract

We propose a Classificatory Topos, a mathematical framework to model the dynamic evolution of knowledge within a finite system of interacting learning machines. Following guidelines of category theory, the construction establishes a Grothendieck topos, \(\text {Sh}(C_{\text {learn}}, J)\), as a mathematical universe for this problem domain. By defining a base site on a category of epistemic states with causal morphisms, and equipping it with a Grothendieck topology that formalizes a logic of justification, the framework provides a rich, non-linear model of system evolution. The use of sheaves ensures causal consistency, while the internal logic of the topos, governed by a subobject classifier, provides the machinery to trace, verify, and explain the refinement of classifications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    A strong Bayesian prior is an informative prior that expresses strong, definite prior information or beliefs about a model parameter, causing it to dominate the information from the data, resulting in a posterior distribution that is little changed from the prior.

References

  1. Caramello, O.: The unification of mathematics via Topos theory, arXiv:1006.3930 (2010)

  2. Caramello, O.: The theory of topos-theoretic ’bridges’: a conceptual introduction. Glass Bead (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cemri, M., et al.: Why do multi-agent LLM systems fail? arXiv:2503.13657 (2025)

  4. Ford Doolittle, W.: The practice of classification and the theory of evolution, and the tree of life. Biol. Philos. 25, 709–729 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eilenberg, S., Mac Lane, S.: General theory of natural equivalences. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 58(2), 231–294 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gavranović, B., et al.: Position: categorical deep learning is an algebraic theory of all architectures, arXiv:2402.15332 (2024)

  7. Gebhart, T.: Categories for AI: sheaves for AI. Virtual lecture series (2022). Accessed 20 Jul 2025

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gebhart, T., Hansen, J., Paul, S.: Knowledge sheaves: a sheaf-theoretic framework for knowledge graph embedding. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Valencia, Spain, vol. 206 (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldblatt, R.: Topoi. The Categorial Analysis of Logic. Dover (2006) (Revised Edition)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iyer, S.: Category theory in deep learning: a new lens for abstraction, composition, and the nature of intelligence. Medium (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnstone, P.T.: Topos Theory. Academic Press (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mac Lane, S.: Categories for the Working Mathematician, volume 5 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2nd edn (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marquis, J.-P.: Category theory. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2016 edition (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Partsch, H.: Specification and Transformation of Programs. Springer-Verlag (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Porter, T.: Interpreted systems and kripke models for multiagent systems from a categorical perspective . Theoret. Comput. Sci. (323) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosiak, D.: Sheaf Theory through Examples. The MIT Press, October 2022

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sontag, E.D.: Forward completeness of discrete-time nonlinear systems. Syst. Control Lett. 31, 45–50 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sontag, E.D.: Mathematical Control Theory: Deterministic Finite-Dimensional Systems, volume 6 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, 2nd edn (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spivak, D.I., Kent, R.E.: Ologs: a categorical framework for knowledge representation. arXiv:1102.1889 (2011)

  20. Youvan, D.C., et al.: An algebraic framework for artificial intelligence: defining an AI topos within abstract algebra. ResearchGate Preprint (2024). Accessed via ResearchGate

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goubault, É., Ledent, J., Rajsbaum, S.: A simplicial complex model for dynamic epistemic logic to study distributed task computability. Inf. Comput. 278, 104597 (2021). Special Issue on Ninth International Symposium on Games, Automata, Logics and Formal Verification (GandALF 2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the facilities provided by the Universidad Tecnológica de la Mixteca in support of our ongoing research. We extend our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers of MIWAI 2025 for their dedication and for helping us improve the presentation of our research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Hernández.

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2026 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hernández, M., Sánchez-Soto, E., Castañeda-Roldán, C. (2026). A Classificatory Topos: Refining Evolving Knowledge in Multi-agent Learning Systems. In: Quan, T.T., Sombattheera, C., Pham, HA., Tran, N.T. (eds) Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence. MIWAI 2025. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 16354. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-4960-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics