Return to Answer

Only two versions, thanks Stéphane Chazelas!

Source Link

edited Mar 1, 2024 at 21:18

481.1k
59
1.2k
1.4k

tree versions 1.87.0 and earlier1.8.0 didn’t take --du into account when sorting by size: directories were sorted by their own size, not the size of their contents. This was fixed in version 2.0.0.

tree versions 1.8.0 and earlier didn’t take --du into account when sorting by size: directories were sorted by their own size, not the size of their contents. This was fixed in version 2.0.0.

tree versions 1.7.0 and 1.8.0 didn’t take --du into account when sorting by size: directories were sorted by their own size, not the size of their contents. This was fixed in version 2.0.0.

Source Link

answered Mar 1, 2024 at 20:14

Stephen Kitt

481.1k
59
1.2k
1.4k

tree versions 1.8.0 and earlier didn’t take --du into account when sorting by size: directories were sorted by their own size, not the size of their contents. This was fixed in version 2.0.0.