Skip to main content
Unix & Linux

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • Welcome to the site, and thank you for your contribution. Please note that link-only answers are discouraged as they can become invalid when the link becomes dead or the page linked to changes. If possible, edit your post to add at least a summary of what the external page recommends to do to solve the OPs problem. Commented Jul 10, 2020 at 15:18
  • Thank you. That ok. Commented Jul 10, 2020 at 15:19
  • Thank you. I only took the liberty to apply a minor edit to your post to make it more readable. Commented Jul 10, 2020 at 15:29
  • Glad for that. It teaches me for the next time. Thanks! Commented Jul 10, 2020 at 15:44
  • 1
    All the misc unicode fonts... (ends in "-iso10646-1") have a very good set of glyphs, thanks the the hard work of the font maintainer Markus Kuhn back when unicode was still new. HOWEVER: bold bold fonts generally do not have all the glyphs. these out out put dotted boxes insead! EG try... echo $'●\e[1m●\e[m' to test normal and bold Commented Jul 23, 2020 at 6:03