Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • Thank you, now I see my error. I got confused and assumed multiple addresses would qualify as virtual network, instead I really need a new interface. Commented Jan 24, 2017 at 20:00
  • For the record, this is what got me confused: linuxconfig.org/configuring-virtual-network-interfaces-in-linux If I now understood correctly, the article is misusing the word "virtual", to represent what is actually a multiple-address configuration, as opposite to a full vlan deployment. Commented Jan 24, 2017 at 21:44
  • Yes. This article at linuxconfig.org is wrong. Read about KVM and linux network on Redhat documentation site. Commented Jan 25, 2017 at 5:27