Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 2
    this might incorrectly match lines that had "true" text without the surrounding tag text. Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 18:41
  • 1
    Plus, you want the g at the end, so that lines with more than one match have all the matches edited. I guess `s|>true<|>false<|g' would be a good middle ground between no tags at all, and replacing only exact matches with complete tags? Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 18:55