Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
  3. Article

Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula)

  • Published: April 1992
  • Volume 30, pages 207–217, (1992)
  • Cite this article

Access provided by Institution of Civil Engineers Library

Download PDF
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula)
Download PDF
  • Geir A. Sonerud1 
  • 149 Accesses

  • 33 Citations

  • 6 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Summary

After having erected artificial perches of different heights in a clear-cut, I studied the effect of perching height on the allocation of search and pursuit effort of 9 individuals of the hawk owl. Hawk owls are diurnal and locate their small mammal prey visually. Horizontal attack and move distances increased with perching height in most individual cases, as well as across cases. Prey detection and giving-up times increased with perching height in half of the individual cases, but not across cases. Attack and move distances increased with perching time in only a few individual cases, and not across cases. Perching height explained more of the variation in attack and move distances than did perching time. Move distance depended on both preceding and subsequent perching heights. When giving up a perch the owls on average moved slightly farther than the distance predicted if travel distance as well as overlap between successive search areas are to be minimized. When the ground was snow-free, distances of successful attacks tended to be shorter than those of unsuccessful attacks. Moreover, perches from which prey were captured, but not perches from which unsuccessful attacks were launched, tended to be lower than perches which were given up. This may suggest that the predator-prey distance is more critical to the probability of capture than to the probability of detection. Longer horizontal attack distances from higher perches suggest that the size of the area effectively searched around each perch increases with the height of the perch. Therefore, longer giving-up times on higher perches indicate allocation of more search time to larger search areas, and longer moves after giving up or before landing on higher perches indicate avoidance of overlap with the larger search areas of these perches. These adjustments of giving-up time and move distance allow hawk owls to forage efficiently.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Timely poacher detection and localization using sentinel animal movement

Article Open access 25 February 2021

Optimization of avian perching manoeuvres

Article Open access 29 June 2022

Predicting burrowing owl flight trajectories in urban environments

Article 28 September 2021

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Animal Migration
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Ethology
  • Ecology
  • Ornithology
  • Primatology
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1981) On optimal predator search. Theor Pop Biol 19:58–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Balgooyen TH (1976) Behavior and ecology of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius L.) in the Sierra Nevada of California. Univ Calif Publ Zool 103:1–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ, Green RE (1980) Foraging behaviour of migrant pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca on temporary territories. J Anim Ecol 49:507–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrkjedal I, Langhelle G (1986) Sex and age biased mobility in hawk owls Surnia ulula. Ornis Scand 17:306–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson A (1985) Prey detection in the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio): an experimental study. Anim Behav 33:1243–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB (1977) Prey selection and the search strategy of the spotted flycatcher (Muscicapa striata): a field study on optimal foraging. Anim Behav 25:1016–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt RC (1979) The adaptive syndromes of two guilds of insectivorous birds in the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 49:129–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JW (1980) Foraging behavior of neotropical tyrant flycatchers. Condor 82:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick JW (1981) Search strategies of tyrant flycatchers. Anim Behav 29:810–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1979) Selection of feeding areas by Senegal kingfishers, Halcyon senegalensis. Z Tierpsychol 49:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-Smith PW (1983) Use of perches as vantage points during foraging by male and female stonechats, Saxicola torquata. Behaviour 86:215–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen Y (1956) The irruption of hawk owls Surnia ulula (L.) in Fennoscandia 1950–51. Sterna, Opusc Ser Zool 24:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L, Henttonen H (1985) Gradients in density variations of small rodents: the importance of latitude and snow cover. Oecologia 67:394–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogstad O (1986) On the winter food of the hawk owl Surnia ulula. Fauna Norv, Ser C, Cinclus 9:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe NB (1985) Prey detection by intertidally feeding lapwings. Z Tierpsychol 67:45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola H (1983) Owls of Europe. Poyser, Calton

    Google Scholar 

  • Moermond TC (1979) The influence of habitat structure on Anolis foraging behavior. Behaviour 70:147–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J (1984) Search strategies of wheatears (Oenanthe oenanthe) and stonechats (Saxicola torguata): adaptive variation in perch height, search time, sally distance and inter-perch move length. J Anim Ecol 53:147–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg RÅ (1987) Evolution, structure, and ecology of northern forest owls. In: Nero RW, Clark RJ, Knapton RJ, Hamre RH (eds) Biology and conservation of northern forest owls: symposium proceedings. USDA For Serv Gen Tech Rep RM-142, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp 9–43

  • O'Brien WJ, Evans BI, Browman HI (1989) Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals. Oecologia 80:100–110

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien WJ, Browman HI, Evans BI (1990) Search strategies of foraging animals. Am Sci 78:152–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pienkowski MW (1983) Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factors. Anim Behav 31:244–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkowski BC (1977) Foraging behavior of the eastern bluebird. Wilson Bull 89:404–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice WR (1983) Sensory modality: an example of its effect on optimal foraging behavior. Ecology 64:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson SK, Holmes RT (1982) Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology 63:1918–1931

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph SG (1982) Foraging strategies of American kestrels during breeding. Ecology 63:1268–1276

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud GA (1980) Hunting strategies of birds which feed on small mammals in boreal forests (in Norwegian). Cand real thesis, University of Oslo

  • Sonerud GA (1986) Effect of snow cover on seasonal changes in diet, habitat, and regional distribution of raptors that prey on small mammals in boreal zones of Fennoscandia. Holarct Ecol 9:33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud GA (1988) What causes extended lows in microtine cycles? Analysis of fluctuations in sympatric shrew and microtine populations in Fennoscandia. Oecologia 76:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonerud GA, Nybo JO, Fjeld PE, Knoff C (1987) A case of bigyny in the hawk owl Surnia ulula: spacing of nests and allocation of male feeding effort. Ornis Fenn 64:144–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Temeles EJ (1989) Effect of prey consumption on foraging activity of northern harriers. Auk 106:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (1988) Foraging behaviour and selection of prey and perches by the buffstreaked chat Oenanthe bifasciata. Ostrich 59:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye A (1989) A model of search behaviour for the northern wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe (Aves, Turdidae) and other pause-travel predators. Ethology 83:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Division of Zoology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1050, N-0316, Blindern, Oslo 3, Norway

    Geir A. Sonerud

Authors
  1. Geir A. Sonerud
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sonerud, G.A. Search tactics of a pause-travel predator: adaptive adjustments of perching times and move distances by hawk owls (Surnia ulula). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30, 207–217 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166705

Download citation

  • Received: 22 August 1990

  • Accepted: 01 November 1991

  • Issue date: April 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166705

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Individual Case
  • Small Mammal
  • Search Area
  • Move Distance
  • Successful Attack
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

172.70.131.160

ICE Institution of Civil Engineers (3000167333) - Institution of Civil Engineers Library (2000027800)

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature