Here it is. If you are a professional, if you are under NDA with your clients, if you are a creative, a lawyer, a doctor or anyone who works with proprietary files - it is time to cancel Adobe, delete all the apps and programs. Adobe can not be trusted.
Wetterschneider on X: "Here it is. If you are a professional, if you are under NDA with your clients, if you are a creative, a lawyer, a doctor or anyone who works with proprietary files - it is time to cancel Adobe, delete all the apps and programs. Adobe can not be trusted."
Okay - doing the deed - I'm a toy designer and digital sculptor. Some of my work if you're curious or interested in making a run of toys.A heck, sorry, I should have posted this before the self-promo banger rider. Here's another link to KennyNL's Adobe Alternatives on Github. github.com/KenneyNL/Adobe…THIS is pure offensive insanity. Adobe is claiming royalty-free rights to copy and make new content out of customers' assets. Adobe is claiming that they can then sub-license customer assets to OTHER companies. They describe a "reasonable" use-case, but describe no limitations.The director, Duncan Jones, is locked out and can't use Adobe software he is paying for until he agrees to the new TOS."iT's StAnDaRd" isn't really a great defense, people. Our assets are our business. If a company wants to use our assets to help "improve" their software - then they can hire us and pay us. This shouldn't be an all-you-can-eat buffet of free assets for their R&D."They mean for making thumbnails!" Really? When we read "Publicly display" and "Publicly perform" - we don't think thumbnails. Nothing that I upload ever is for a public performance by Adobe or Google or Dropbox - cloud services were sold to us as an extension of our HDs.Wow, what a relief, you CAN "opt-out" of the "on by default" content processing for your proprietary assets - and uh what's that? Adobe will, under "certain limited circumstances" ignore that the little graphic is "switched to off"? So there's no true way to opt-out.
Thanks for the warning...that really is worrysome. Why do they think that is acceptable?...a lot of professionals use their software for confidential projects. Wtf
