Skip to main content
AI Assist is now on Stack Overflow. Start a chat to get instant answers from across the network. Sign up to save and share your chats.
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2017 at 12:08 history edited URL Rewriter Bot
replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Dec 7, 2016 at 5:18 answer added Naveen Kumar timeline score: 0
May 20, 2015 at 11:08 answer added arturmoroz timeline score: 1
Sep 2, 2014 at 18:43 audit Suggested edits
Sep 2, 2014 at 19:05
Aug 27, 2014 at 21:41 answer added code-sushi timeline score: 1
Aug 27, 2014 at 18:28 history edited code-sushi CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Aug 27, 2014 at 18:27 vote accept code-sushi
Aug 26, 2014 at 7:06 answer added Yoshi timeline score: 10
Aug 26, 2014 at 6:55 comment added Yoshi I see, no you'll always need two seperate models. One which acts as the list of options (this should probably always be an array of objects) and one to store the selected value (this will then differ in regards to how you set up the ngOptions directive).
Aug 25, 2014 at 22:08 comment added code-sushi My main concern is what goes in $scope.typeOptions (using the example from the other thread above) INSTEAD OF an array, to get foo.name and foo.bar_id key-value pairs from the data object foo. I have tried putting <select ng-model='fooOptions' ng-options='foo.name as foo.bar_id for foo in fooOptions'></select> but it does not work -- nothing shows up. When I use those as an ng-repeat in the option tag it works (foo.name and foo.bar_id) so the problem isn't with the object properties themselves.
Aug 25, 2014 at 22:04 comment added code-sushi That's fine; I don't have to have "foo.bar_id" as the option value; I just have to have it available so when the user selects an option it is inserted into a corresponding url parameter to update the display.
Aug 25, 2014 at 21:54 comment added Yoshi With ngOptions you can't force angular to use your model-data as the actual option-value in the view. Angular handles this in it's own way. It only assures that your scope-model will be set to the correct value on change. If that's not what you want, than you'll have to write your own directive, probably using ngRepeat.
Aug 25, 2014 at 21:50 history edited code-sushi
fixing automistake's auto-mistakes.
Aug 25, 2014 at 21:45 history edited code-sushi CC BY-SA 3.0
fixing automistake's auto-mistakes.
Aug 25, 2014 at 21:36 history asked code-sushi CC BY-SA 3.0