Timeline for answer to What is the difference between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? by Mike DeAngelo
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
Post Revisions
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2024 at 16:09 | comment | added | Wolf | On GitHub, there is a modern version of Git from the Bottom Up by John Wiegley. | |
| Jun 20, 2022 at 7:32 | comment | added | Aleks N. | Wrong. A repository doesn't contain a copy of your working tree. A repository is a list of changes. So there is only a single instance of a project on a workstation unless you explicitly cp -R it. | |
| Sep 26, 2018 at 6:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Sep 26, 2018 at 7:39 | |||||
| Aug 24, 2018 at 20:01 | history | edited | Ian Ringrose | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added missing word
|
| Dec 13, 2017 at 22:17 | history | edited | dippas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jun 4, 2014 at 17:02 | history | edited | Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
remove boilerplate. Late answers are not silly =)
|
| Apr 25, 2014 at 6:32 | history | edited | Dr Casper Black | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
more obvious pull fetch exlanation
|
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Aug 15, 2013 at 2:14 | |||||
| Aug 14, 2013 at 9:51 | comment | added | Emil Lundberg |
Technically, the local and remote repositories are really one and the same. In Git, a repository is a DAG of commits pointing to their parents. Branches are, technically, nothing more than meaningful names of commits. The only difference between local and remote branches is that remote ones are prefixed with remoteName/ Git from the ground up is a very good read. Once you get an understanding of how Git works - and it's beautifully simple, really - everything just makes sense.
|
|
| Apr 29, 2013 at 10:17 | audit | Low quality answers | |||
| Apr 29, 2013 at 10:17 | |||||
| Mar 31, 2013 at 18:43 | history | answered | Mike DeAngelo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |