Timeline for OpenCV or Boost smart pointers

7 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
May 23, 2017 at 12:14	history	edited	URL Rewriter Bot		replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/
Apr 8, 2013 at 7:35	vote	accept	Chris
Mar 30, 2013 at 5:32	answer	added	Germán Diago		timeline score: 7
Dec 19, 2012 at 11:28	comment	added	marko		Which you use will rather depend on the APIs you are calling - these 3 flavours of smart pointer are not necessarily interchangeable, or provide conversion operators between themselves. For this reason, there are often good reasons to use the `boost::shared_ptr` implementation instead of `std::shared_ptr` when using other parts of the boost library. The same is likely to hold for OpenCV too.
Dec 19, 2012 at 11:22	comment	added	yiding		+1 on `std::shared_ptr` if you are using C++11. Otherwise it really comes down to whether you are already using boost or are planning to use boost, or interoperate with things using boost. I don't think it's worth including boost just for the `shared_ptr`, since `cv::Ptr` works well enough.
Dec 19, 2012 at 11:20	comment	added	undu		Have you considered using the standard smart pointers (if you have access to C++11) ?
Dec 19, 2012 at 11:17	history	asked	Chris	CC BY-SA 3.0