The Living Planet Index does not measure abundance
- PMID: 35082408
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03708-8
The Living Planet Index does not measure abundance
Comment in
-
Reply to: The Living Planet Index does not measure abundance.Nature. 2022 Jan;601(7894):E16. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03709-7. Nature. 2022. PMID: 35082407 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Clustered versus catastrophic global vertebrate declines.Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7837):267-271. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2920-6. Epub 2020 Nov 18. Nature. 2020. PMID: 33208939
References
-
- Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M. & Petersen, T. (eds) Living Planet Report 2020 – Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (WWF, 2020).
-
- Leung, B. et al. Clustered versus catastrophic global vertebrate declines. Nature 588, 267–271 (2020). - DOI
-
- Buckland, S. T., Studeny, A. C., Magurran, A. E., Illian, J. B. & Newson, S. E. The geometric mean of relative abundance indices: a biodiversity measure with a difference. Ecosphere 2, 1–15 (2011). - DOI
-
- McRae, L., Deinet, S. & Freeman, R. The diversity-weighted living planet index: controlling for taxonomic bias in a global biodiversity indicator. PLoS ONE 12, e0169156 (2017). - DOI
-
- Leung, B., Greenberg, D. A. & Green, D. M. Trends in mean growth and stability in temperate vertebrate populations. Divers. Distrib. 23, 1372–1380 (2017). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
