Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 4;23(9):1167.
doi: 10.3390/e23091167.

Ordinal Time Series Forecasting of the Air Quality Index

Affiliations

Ordinal Time Series Forecasting of the Air Quality Index

Cathy W S Chen et al. Entropy (Basel). .

Abstract

This research models and forecasts daily AQI (air quality index) levels in 16 cities/counties of Taiwan, examines their AQI level forecast performance via a rolling window approach over a one-year validation period, including multi-level forecast classification, and measures the forecast accuracy rates. We employ statistical modeling and machine learning with three weather covariates of daily accumulated precipitation, temperature, and wind direction and also include seasonal dummy variables. The study utilizes four models to forecast air quality levels: (1) an autoregressive model with exogenous variables and GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity) errors; (2) an autoregressive multinomial logistic regression; (3) multi-class classification by support vector machine (SVM); (4) neural network autoregression with exogenous variable (NNARX). These models relate to lag-1 AQI values and the previous day's weather covariates (precipitation and temperature), while wind direction serves as an hour-lag effect based on the idea of nowcasting. The results demonstrate that autoregressive multinomial logistic regression and the SVM method are the best choices for AQI-level predictions regarding the high average and low variation accuracy rates.

Keywords: ARX-GARCH model; artificial neural network; autoregressive logistic regression; machine learning; multi-class classification; one-step-ahead forecast; support vector machine; training and validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographical locations of the 16 sites in Taiwan. Taipei: site 1; Taoyuan: site 2; Hsinchu: site 3; Miaoli: site 4; Taichung: sites 5 and 6; Changhua: site 7; Yunlin: site 8; Chiayi: sites 9 and 10; Tainan: sites 11 and 12; Kaohsiung: sites 13 and 14; Pingtung: sites 15 and 16.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The rolling window approach.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time series plots of daily AQI values for Shilin, Fengyuan, Zuoying, and Pingtung (sites 1, 6, 13, and 15) from 30 November 2016 to 9 April 2020.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time series plots of daily PRE for Shilin, Fengyuan, Zuoying, and Pingtung (sites 1, 6, 13, and 15) from 30 November 2016 to 9 April 2020.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time series plots of daily TEM for Shilin, Fengyuan, Zuoying, and Pingtung (sites 1, 6, 13, and 15) from 30 November 2016 to 9 April 2020.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Monthly AQI levels for Shilin, Fengyuan, Zuoying, and Pingtung (sites 1, 6, 13, and 15) from 30 November 2016 to 9 April 2020.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Forecasting performance for two-level classifications. “△”denotes the average of accuracy rates from all 16 sites.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Forecasting performance for four-level classifications. “△” denotes the average of accuracy rates from all 16 sites.

References

    1. Ferlito S., Bosso F., De Vito S., Esposito E., Di Francia G. LSTM Networks for Particulate Matter Concentration Forecasting in AISEM Annual Conference on Sensors and Microsystems. Springer; Cham, Switzeland: 2019. pp. 409–415.
    1. Song C., Fu X. Research on different weight combination in air quality forecasting models. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;261:121–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121169. - DOI
    1. Wu Q., Lin H. Daily urban air quality index forecasting based on variational mode decomposition, sample entropy and LSTM neural network. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019;50:101–657. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101657. - DOI
    1. Xiao F., Yang M., Fan H., Fan G., Al-Qaness M.A. An improved deep learning model for predicting daily PM2.5 concentration. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:20988. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77757-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Medrano R., Buen Remiro V., Aznarte J.L. SOCAIRE: Forecasting and monitoring urban air quality in Madrid. Environ. Model. Softw. 2021;143:105084. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105084. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources