Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May:46:189-201.
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

Riemannian metric optimization on surfaces (RMOS) for intrinsic brain mapping in the Laplace-Beltrami embedding space

Affiliations

Riemannian metric optimization on surfaces (RMOS) for intrinsic brain mapping in the Laplace-Beltrami embedding space

Jin Kyu Gahm et al. Med Image Anal. 2018 May.

Abstract

Surface mapping methods play an important role in various brain imaging studies from tracking the maturation of adolescent brains to mapping gray matter atrophy patterns in Alzheimer's disease. Popular surface mapping approaches based on spherical registration, however, have inherent numerical limitations when severe metric distortions are present during the spherical parameterization step. In this paper, we propose a novel computational framework for intrinsic surface mapping in the Laplace-Beltrami (LB) embedding space based on Riemannian metric optimization on surfaces (RMOS). Given a diffeomorphism between two surfaces, an isometry can be defined using the pullback metric, which in turn results in identical LB embeddings from the two surfaces. The proposed RMOS approach builds upon this mathematical foundation and achieves general feature-driven surface mapping in the LB embedding space by iteratively optimizing the Riemannian metric defined on the edges of triangular meshes. At the core of our framework is an optimization engine that converts an energy function for surface mapping into a distance measure in the LB embedding space, which can be effectively optimized using gradients of the LB eigen-system with respect to the Riemannian metrics. In the experimental results, we compare the RMOS algorithm with spherical registration using large-scale brain imaging data, and show that RMOS achieves superior performance in the prediction of hippocampal subfields and cortical gyral labels, and the holistic mapping of striatal surfaces for the construction of a striatal connectivity atlas from substantia nigra.

Keywords: Cortex; Hippocampus; Laplace–Beltrami embedding; Striatum.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A conceptual comparison of (A) the conventional method based on spherical registration and (B) the proposed metric optimization framework in the Laplace-Beltrami embedding space. In both (A) and (B), M1 and M2 denote the brain surfaces in the image space. In (A), 1 and 2 denote their spherical maps, and ũ1 and ũ2 denote the maps between the spherical maps of both surfaces. In (B), 1 and 2 denote the LB embeddings of M1 and M2, and ũ1 and ũ2 denote the maps between their LB embeddings. The fundamental advantage of the metric optimization framework in (B) is that there is no extra distortion induced by the parameterization process, and all the metric changes are induced to match the two surfaces. On the other hand, the spherical mapping process in (A) introduces large metric distortions purely for the parameterization step, which can lead to large errors in the final maps.
Figure 2
Figure 2
For a triangle 𝒯l ∈ 𝒯, which is composed of three vertices (𝒱i, 𝒱j, 𝒱k), the notations for its angles and metrics on each edge are shown.
Figure 3
Figure 3
RMOS mapping of two left hippocampal surfaces: (A) Source and (B) target surfaces colored with mean curvature, (C) Projection of the source onto the target surface, (D) The pullback mean curvature from the target surface onto the source surface. (E) CMOS mapping results: the pullback mean curvature from the target surface onto the source surface with the map from CMOS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
An illustration of the effect of RMOS on the LB eigenfunctions of surfaces. In (A) and (B), we show the 5th (left) and 7th (right) eigenfunctions before RMOS of the source and target surfaces, respectively. In (E) and (F), we show the 5th (left) and 7th (right) eigenfunctions after RMOS of the source and target surfaces, respectively. The optimized metrics for the source and target surfaces are plotted in (C) and (D), respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Results from spherical mapping. (A) Spherical parametrization of the source (top) and target (bottom) mesh by SPHARM-MAT (colored with MC of the original mesh shown in Fig. 3 (A) and (B)). (B) Projection of the source onto target surface with the map computed by FreeSurfer. (C) The pullback MC from the target surface onto the source surface with the map from FreeSurfer. (D) Histogram of edge length distortion ratio (RMOS: 1.01 ± 0.29; Spherical Mapping: 1.09 ± 0.55 [Mean ± STD]).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Validation of hippocampal mapping algorithms with subfield labels generated from high resolution T2-weighted MRIs of 380 subjects. (A) The atlas surface colored by subfield labels. (B) An example subject surface used as the target surface. The colorbar on the right shows the complete list of subfield labels produced by FreeSurfer 6.0. The pullback labels from the target surface to the atlas surface with RMOS and spherical registration are shown in (C) and (D), respectively. Box plots of the Dice coefficients that measure the overlap of the pullback labels from each subject and the atlas surface labels with maps from RMOS and spherical registration are shown in (E) and (F), respectively. Three main labels are used. Sub: subiculum + parasubiculum + presubiculum; CA1: CA1 + HATA; CA2/3/4: CA2/3 + CA4 + GC-DG + fimbria + fissure. The results from different patients groups (Normal, EMCI, LMCI, and AD) are also plotted separately.
Figure 7
Figure 7
A comparison of mapping results between two left cortical surfaces based on RMOS and spherical registration. (A) Source and (B) target surfaces colored with mean curvature. (C) Projection of the source onto the target surface by the map from RMOS. (D) The pullback mean curvature from the target surface onto the source surface by the RMOS map. Spherical maps of the source (E) and target (F) surfaces as colored with the same mean curvature in (A) and (B), respectively. (G) The pullback mean curvature from the target sphere onto the source sphere by the map from the spherical registration of FreeSurfer. (H) The pullback mean curvature from the target surface onto the source surface using the map from spherical registration.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Validation of cortical mapping algorithms with manual labels from the LPBA40 atlas. Each cortical surface has 24 manually delineated gyral labels. Lateral and medial view of (A) the atlas surface, and (B) one of the subject surfaces. The pullback labels from the target surface onto the atlas surface with RMOS and FreeSurfer’s spherical registration are shown in (C) and (D), respectively. (E) Box plots of the Dice coefficients (DCs) between the pullback labels from each subject and the corresponding labels on the atlas surface with maps from RMOS and spherical registration are shown in (E). Labels with significantly different DCs between the two methods are marked with one asterisk (p-value<0.05) or double asterisks (p-value<0.005).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Construction of the probabilistic atlas of substantia nigra (SN)-striatum connectivity using data from 20 HCP subjects. (A) FOD-based tractography between the left SN and striatum from one HCP subject. (B) The probabilistic SN-striatum connectivity atlas built with ANC-driven RMOS maps. (C) The probabilistic SN-striatum connectivity atlas built with RMOS maps driven by cortical connectivity features.

References

    1. Beg MF, Miller MI, Trouvé A, Younes L. Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int’l Journal of Computer Vision. 2005;61:139–157.
    1. Burguière E, Monteiro P, Feng G, Graybiel AM. Optogenetic stimulation of lateral orbitofronto-striatal pathway suppresses compulsive behaviors. Science. 2013;340:1243–1246. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charon N, Trouve A. The varifold representation of nonoriented shapes for diffeomorphic registration. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences. 2013;6:2547–2580.
    1. Davies RH, Twining CJ, Cootes TF, Taylor CJ. Building 3-D statistical shape models by direct optimization. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2010;29:961–981. - PubMed
    1. Durrleman S, Pennec X, Trouvé A, Ayache N. Statistical models of sets of curves and surfaces based on currents. Med. Image. Anal. 2009;13:793–808. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms