From Lucy to Kadanuumuu: balanced analyses of Australopithecus afarensis assemblages confirm only moderate skeletal dimorphism
- PMID: 25945314
- PMCID: PMC4419524
- DOI: 10.7717/peerj.925
From Lucy to Kadanuumuu: balanced analyses of Australopithecus afarensis assemblages confirm only moderate skeletal dimorphism
Abstract
Sexual dimorphism in body size is often used as a correlate of social and reproductive behavior in Australopithecus afarensis. In addition to a number of isolated specimens, the sample for this species includes two small associated skeletons (A.L. 288-1 or "Lucy" and A.L. 128/129) and a geologically contemporaneous death assemblage of several larger individuals (A.L. 333). These have driven both perceptions and quantitative analyses concluding that Au. afarensis was markedly dimorphic. The Template Method enables simultaneous evaluation of multiple skeletal sites, thereby greatly expanding sample size, and reveals that A. afarensis dimorphism was similar to that of modern humans. A new very large partial skeleton (KSD-VP-1/1 or "Kadanuumuu") can now also be used, like Lucy, as a template specimen. In addition, the recently developed Geometric Mean Method has been used to argue that Au. afarensis was equally or even more dimorphic than gorillas. However, in its previous application Lucy and A.L. 128/129 accounted for 10 of 11 estimates of female size. Here we directly compare the two methods and demonstrate that including multiple measurements from the same partial skeleton that falls at the margin of the species size range dramatically inflates dimorphism estimates. Prevention of the dominance of a single specimen's contribution to calculations of multiple dimorphism estimates confirms that Au. afarensis was only moderately dimorphic.
Keywords: Chimpanzee; Gorilla; Homin; Hominid; Human evolution; Reproductive behavior; Sexual dimorphism; Sexual selection.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Behrensmeyer AL. Paleoenvironmental context of the Pliocene A.L. 333 “First Family” hominin locality, Hadar Formation, Ethiopia. In: Quade J, Wynn JG, editors. The geology of early humans in the horn of Africa: Geological Society of America Special Paper. vol. 446. 2008. pp. 203–214. - DOI
-
- Brunet M, Guy F, Pilbeam D, Mackaye HT, Likius A, Ahounta D, Beauvilain A, Blondel C, Bocherens H, Boisserie JR, De Bonis L, Coppens Y, Dejax J, Denys C, Duringer P, Eisenmann V, Fanone G, Fronty P, Geraads D, Lehmann T, Lihoreau F, Louchart A, Mahamat A, Merceron G, Mouchelin G, Otero O, Pelaez CP, Ponce DL, Rage JC, Sapanet M, Schuster M, Sudre J, Tassy P, Valentin X, Vignaud P, Viriot L, Zazzo A, Zollikofer C. A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central Africa. Nature. 2002;418:145–151. doi: 10.1038/nature00879. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Gordon AD. Sexual size dimorphism in Australopithecus: current understanding and new directions. In: Reed KE, Fleagle JG, Leakey RE, editors. The paleobiology of Australopithecus. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
