Results for 'Memory interference'

298+ found
Order:
  1.  51
    Working memory, interference, and inhibition.Robert J. Douglas - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (3):327-328.
  2.  79
    A Matter of Memory? Age‐Invariant Relative Clause Disambiguation and Memory Interference in Older Adults.Willem S. van Boxtel & Laurel A. Lawyer - forthcoming - Topics in Cognitive Science.
    Past research suggests that Working Memory plays a role in determining relative clause attachment bias. Disambiguation preferences may further depend on Processing Speed and explicit memory demands in linguistic tasks. Given that Working Memory and Processing Speed decline with age, older adults offer a way of investigating the factors underlying disambiguation preferences. Additionally, older adults might be subject to more severe similarity-based memory interference given their larger vocabularies and slower lexical access. Nevertheless, memory (...) and sentence disambiguation have not been combined in studies on older adults before. We used a self-paced reading paradigm under memory load interference conditions. Older (n = 30) and Younger (n = 35) readers took part in the study online; reading times were recorded and measures of comprehension accuracy and load recall were collected. This setup allowed for the implicit measurement of attachment biases and memory interference effects interactively. Results show that similarity-based interference affected both age groups equally, but was more pronounced in NP2-biased structures, which took participants generally longer to read. Attachment preferences did not differ by group and were unaffected by Working Memory span. However, accuracy on recall prompts was predicted by Working Memory span in both groups. Findings of greater interference in syntactically dispreferred structures support unified processing models where parsing constraints naturally interact. The lack of age differences on our measures further aligns with research finding age-invariant implicit language processing. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  54
    Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development.C. J. Brainerd & V. F. Reyna - 1993 - Psychological Review 100 (1):42-67.
  4.  57
    "Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development": Correction.C. J. Brainerd & V. F. Reyna - 1993 - Psychological Review 100 (2):319-319.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  43
    Cue-induced memory interference in the rat.William C. Gordon, Robert R. Mowrer, Charles P. McGinnis & Martha J. McDermott - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (3):233-236.
  6. Eighteen-month-olds’ memory interference and distraction in a modified A-not-B task is not associated with their anticipatory looking in a false-belief task.Norbert Zmyj, Wolfgang Prinz & Moritz M. Daum - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  54
    Environmental overlap and individual encoding strategy modulate memory interference in spatial navigation.Qiliang He, Elizabeth H. Beveridge, Jon Starnes, Sarah C. Goodroe & Thackery I. Brown - 2021 - Cognition 207 (C):104508.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  8. Oh, it's you again: Memory interference from irrelevant emotional and neutral faces.Anne-Cécile Treese, Mikael Johansson & Magnus Lindgren - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (5):907-915.
  9.  71
    Temporal interference stimulation targeting right frontoparietal areas enhances working memory in healthy individuals.Yufeng Zhang, Zhining Zhou, Junhong Zhou, Zhenyu Qian, Jiaojiao Lü, Lu Li & Yu Liu - 2022 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 16:918470.
    BackgroundTemporal interference (TI) stimulation is a novel technique that enables the non-invasive modulation of deep brain regions. However, the implementation of this technology in humans has not been well-characterized or examined, including its safety and feasibility.ObjectiveWe aimed to examine the feasibility, safety, and blinding of using TI on human participants in this pilot study.Materials and methodsIn a randomized, single-blinded, and sham-controlled pilot study, healthy young participants were randomly divided into four groups [TI and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) targeting (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  94
    Memory Without Consolidation: Temporal Distinctiveness Explains Retroactive Interference.Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Gordon D. A. Brown & Stephan Lewandowsky - 2015 - Cognitive Science 39 (7):1570-1593.
    Is consolidation needed to account for retroactive interference in free recall? Interfering mental activity during the retention interval of a memory task impairs performance, in particular if the interference occurs in temporal proximity to the encoding of the to-be-remembered information. There are at least two rival theoretical accounts of this temporal gradient of retroactive interference. The cognitive neuroscience literature has suggested neural consolidation is a pivotal factor determining item recall. According to this account, interfering activity interrupts (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  77
    Sequential Presentation Protects Working Memory From Catastrophic Interference.Ansgar D. Endress & Szilárd Szabó - 2020 - Cognitive Science 44 (5):e12828.
    Neural network models of memory are notorious for catastrophic interference: Old items are forgotten as new items are memorized (French, 1999; McCloskey & Cohen, 1989). While working memory (WM) in human adults shows severe capacity limitations, these capacity limitations do not reflect neural network style catastrophic interference. However, our ability to quickly apprehend the numerosity of small sets of objects (i.e., subitizing) does show catastrophic capacity limitations, and this subitizing capacity and WM might reflect a common (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Michael J. Kane & Randall W. Engle - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):47.
  13.  80
    Retroactive interference in short-term recognition memory for pitch.Dominic W. Massaro - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (1p1):32.
  14. Proactive interference in short-term recognition and recall memory.William M. Petrusic & Richard F. Dillon - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):412.
  15.  96
    Interference in short-term memory.Gerald M. Reicher, Elizabeth J. Ligon & Carol H. Conrad - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (1):95.
  16.  63
    Additive interference processes in short-term memory.Willi Ternes & John C. Yuille - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):432.
  17. Reducing negative emotional memories by retroactive interference.Cody J. Hensley, Hajime Otani & Abby R. Knoll - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (4):801-815.
    ABSTRACTBecause negative emotional memories are often disruptive, we conducted two experiments to reduce these memories by using a retroactive interference paradigm. In both experiments, participants were presented with highly negative pictures followed by highly negative, moderately negative, or neutral pictures or a rest period. Then, following a filler task, participants took a surprise free recall test, recalling pictures from List 1 in Experiment 1 and from both List 1 and List 2 in Experiment 2. In both experiments, recall of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  86
    An interference model of visual working memory.Klaus Oberauer & Hsuan-Yu Lin - 2017 - Psychological Review 124 (1):21-59.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  19.  75
    Proactive interference and directed forgetting in short-term motor memory.Leslie Burwitz - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (5):799.
  20. Working memory span and the role of proactive interference.Cindy Lustig, Cynthia P. May & Lynn Hasher - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2):199.
  21.  72
    Interference in memory between tones adjacent in the musical scale.Diana Deutsch - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):228.
  22.  70
    Studies of the interference process in short-term memory.Henry Reed - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):452.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  72
    Interference in short- and long-term memory.Wayne H. Bartz & Merry Salehi - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):380.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  24.  86
    Interference in short-term motor memory: Interpolated task difficulty, similarity, or activity?Barry H. Kantowitz - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):264.
  25. Interference and memory capacity limitations.Ansgar D. Endress & Szilárd Szabó - 2017 - Psychological Review 124 (5):551-571.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  26. An Account of Interference in Associative Memory: Learning the Fan Effect.Robert Thomson, Anthony M. Harrison, J. Gregory Trafton & Laura M. Hiatt - 2017 - Topics in Cognitive Science 9 (1):69-82.
    Associative learning is an essential feature of human cognition, accounting for the influence of priming and interference effects on memory recall. Here, we extend our account of associative learning that learns asymmetric item-to-item associations over time via experience by including link maturation to balance associations between longer-term stability while still accounting for short-term variability. This account, combined with an existing account of activation strengthening and decay, predicts both human response times and error rates for the fan effect for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  27. Movement Interferes with Visuospatial Working Memory during the Encoding: An ERP Study.Rumeysa Gunduz Can, Thomas Schack & Dirk Koester - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  49
    Cognitive-Motor Dual Task Interference Effects on Declarative Memory: A Theory-Based Review.Phillip D. Tomporowski & Ahmed S. Qazi - 2020 - Frontiers in Psychology 11:524997.
    Bouts of exercise performed either prior to or immediately following study periods enhance encoding and learning. Empirical evidence supporting the benefits of interventions that simultaneously pair physical activity with material to be learned is not conclusive, however. A narrative, theory-based review of dual-task experiments evaluated studies in terms of arousal theories, attention theories, cognitive-energetic theories, and entrainment theories. The pattern of the results of these studies suggests that cognitive-motor interference can either impair or enhance memory of semantic information (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. Input and output interference in short-term associative memory.Endel Tulving & Tannis Y. Arbuckle - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):145.
  30.  43
    Behavioural interference at event boundaries reduces long-term memory performance in the virtual water maze task without affecting working memory performance.Marie Pahlenkemper, Hannah Bernhard, Joel Reithler & Mark J. Roberts - 2024 - Cognition 250 (C):105859.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Retroactive interference in human spatial memory.D. G. Elmes & S. S. Svalina - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (5):330-330.
  32.  50
    Interference Conditions of the Reconsolidation Process in Humans: The Role of Valence and Different Memory Systems.Rodrigo S. Fernández, Luz Bavassi, Laura Kaczer, Cecilia Forcato & María E. Pedreira - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
  33.  49
    Proactive interference and gender change in short- term memory.Judith P. Goggin - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 3 (3):222-224.
  34.  69
    Interference between mnemonic and categorical organization in memory.B. Govardhan Reddy & Francis S. Bellezza - 1986 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (3):169-171.
  35.  54
    Proactive interference in infant recognition memory.Donald J. Tyrrell, Linda G. Snowman, Julie A. Beier & Christine M. Blanck - 1990 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (3):188-190.
  36.  44
    Interference in recognition memory: A replication.Benton J. Underwood & Alan S. Brown - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (3):263-264.
  37.  50
    Interference effects in short-term memory as a function of input modality and the linguistic relationship between learned lists.Andrew L. Weiman & William Bevan - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (1):12-14.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  64
    Neurogenesis interferes with the retrieval of remote memories: Forgetting in neurocomputational terms.Victoria I. Weisz & Pablo F. Argibay - 2012 - Cognition 125 (1):13-25.
  39.  70
    Consolidation and retroactive interference in short-term recognition memory for pitch.Wayne A. Wickelgren - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):250.
  40.  74
    Facilitation and Interference in Indirect/Implicit Memory Tests and in the Process Dissociation Paradigm: The Letter Insertion and the Letter Deletion Tasks.Eyal M. Reingold - 1995 - Consciousness and Cognition 4 (4):459-482.
    This paper introduced the letter insertion and letter deletion tasks. In these tasks participants are presented with letter strings and are instructed to insert or delete a letter to create a word. Experiment 1 demonstrated facilitation priming and established these tasks as sensitive indirect measures of memory. Experiments 2 and 3 demonstrated interference priming effects. In Experiment 4 the process dissociation paradigm was applied to investigate the contributions of automatic and consciously controlled processes to performance on the letter (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  41.  66
    Phonemic similarity and interference in short-term memory for single letters.Wayne A. Wickelgren - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):396.
  42.  88
    Learning and interference effects in short-term memory.Lynn Hasher, Judith Goggin & Donald A. Riley - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):1.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  47
    Tracking Proactive Interference in Visual Memory.Tom Mercer, Ruby-Jane Jarvis, Rebekah Lawton & Frankie Walters - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 13.
    The current contents of visual working memory can be disrupted by previously formed memories. This phenomenon is known as proactive interference, and it can be used to index the availability of old memories. However, there is uncertainty about the robustness and lifetime of proactive interference, which raises important questions about the role of temporal factors in forgetting. The present study assessed different factors that were expected to influence the persistence of proactive interference over an inter-trial interval (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Where is the classic interference theory for sleep and memory?Anton Coenen - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):67-68.
    Walker's target article proposes a refinement of the well known two-stage model of memory formation to explain the positive effects of sleep on consolidation. After a first stage in which a labile memory representation is formed, a further stabilisation of the memory trace takes place in the second stage, which is dependent on (REM) sleep. Walker has refined the latter stage into a stage in which a consolidation-based enhancement occurs. It is not completely clear what consolidation-based enhancement (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  99
    Resistance to interference and the emergence of delayed gains in newly acquired procedural memories: Synaptic and system consolidation?Maria Korman, Tamar Flash & Avi Karni - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):74-75.
    The progressive multistage stabilization of memory (consolidation) relies on post-acquisition neural reorganization. We hypothesize that two processes subserve procedural memory consolidation and are reflected in delayed post-acquisition performance gains: (1) synaptic consolidation, which is classical Hebbian, and (2) in some tasks, concurrently or consequently, “system consolidation,” which might in some skills be sleep-dependent. Behavioral interference may affect either type of consolidation.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  68
    Effects of anxiety and interference on short-term memory.John G. Borkowski & Thomas Mann - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):352.
  47.  60
    Decay of interference as a function of the intertrial interval in short-term memory.Laird S. Cermak - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):499.
  48.  58
    Short-term memory: Storage interference or storage decay?C. Michael Levy & Dennis Jowaisas - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):189.
  49.  61
    Attenuation of proactive interference in short-term memory as a function of cueing to forget.M. T. Turvey & Roy P. Wittlinger - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):295.
  50.  61
    Short-term memory and retroactive interference in visual perception.Charles W. Eriksen & Richard A. Steffy - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (5):423.
1 — 50 / 298