On modernity's changes to “tradition”: A sociological perspective

History and Theory 51 (4):105-113 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article will explore how “tradition” has changed in the process of modernity, with reference to the history and current state of Chinese ethnicities. By employing inevitable relationships in researching “tradition,” such as tradition and the past, tradition and its “original form,” old tradition and new tradition, and the reconstruction and neo-construction of tradition, this article reveals a dynamic but stable essential relationship among them. Whereas both the historical nihilism that completely repudiates tradition and the historical conservatism that completely affirms it are one-sided and untrue, my analysis indicates that the modern development of a Chinese nationality is, in some sense, the history of “the growth of the modern and the invention of tradition.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tradition.Yaacov Yadgar - 2013 - Human Studies 36 (4):451-470.
The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity and the Modernity Context of Philosophy.Xiangping Shen - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:241-247.
A global tradition? Power and historicity.Krzysztof Ziarek - 2004 - Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):103-120.
Georg Simmel: First Sociologist of Modernity.David Frisby - 1997 - In Raymond Boudon, Mohamed Cherkaoui & Jeffrey Alexander, The classical tradition in sociology: the European tradition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. pp. 1--323.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
78 (#737,514)

6 months
7 (#1,406,260)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references