“A New Scientific Phenomenology”? Questions about the Evolution of a Phenomenological Endeavor

Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):212-213 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “A First-Person Analysis Using Third Person-Data as a Generative Method: A Case Study of Surprise in Depression” by Natalie Depraz, Maria Gyemant & Thomas Desmidt. Upshot: Given the claims of Natalie Depraz regarding what she called in 2004 the “practical turn of phenomenology,” I ask the authors how they conceive the research they presented in their 2017 article, particularly regarding transcendental phenomenology.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Supersizing Third-Person, Downsizing First-Person Approaches?S. Vörös - 2017 - Constructivist Foundations 12 (2):210-212.
Une nouvelle ère de la phénoménologie de la religion? Sur les récents travaux de Natalie Depraz et Anthony J. Steinbock.Sylvain Camilleri - 2012 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 4 (1):166-212.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-03-23

Downloads
43 (#1,314,725)

6 months
4 (#1,748,177)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references