Branching-time logic with quantification over branches: The point of view of modal logic

Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):1-39 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Ockhamist branching-time logic [Prior 67], formulas are meant to be evaluated on a specified branch, or history, passing through the moment at hand. The linguistic counterpart of the manifoldness of future is a possibility operator which is read as `at some branch, or history (passing through the moment at hand)'. Both the bundled-trees semantics [Burgess 79] and the $\langle moment, history\rangle$ semantics [Thomason 84] for the possibility operator involve a quantification over sets of moments. The Ockhamist frames are (3-modal) Kripke structures in which this second-order quantification is represented by a first-order quantification. The aim of the present paper is to investigate the notions of modal definability, validity, and axiomatizability concerning 3-modal frames which can be viewed as generalizations of Ockhamist frames

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
282 (#151,613)

6 months
45 (#183,785)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Truth About the Future.Jacek Wawer - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (3):365-401.
A future for the thin red line.Alex Malpass & Jacek Wawer - 2012 - Synthese 188 (1):117-142.
Temporal logic.Temporal Logic - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
B-Theory and Time Biases.Sayid Bnefsi - 2019 - In Patrick Blackburn, Per Hasle & Peter Øhrstrøm, Logic and Philosophy of Time: Further Themes from Prior. Aalborg University Press. pp. 41-52.
BH-CIFOL: Case-Intensional First Order Logic.Nuel Belnap & Thomas Müller - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2:1-32.

View all 35 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Past, present and future.Arthur Prior - 1967 - Oxford,: Clarendon P..
Branching space-time.Nuel D. Belnap - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):385-434.
A Course in Mathematical Logic.J. L. Bell & M. Machover - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (2):207-208.

View all 17 references / Add more references